Pros and cons of simul-rappelling
|
Many people would prefer not to see the page about the death of Brad Gobright commingled with general thoughts and comments about simul-rapping. |
|
I thank you |
|
yeah, being able to use a grigri and have two people dealing with rope management are the big pros. In situations where the rope needs to be saddlebagged, you can have two people dealing with that, which is a lot easier. Another pro is that it is a bit harder for one climber to knock rocks onto the other climber. |
|
The only time I don't simul-rap is when I'm using a pull cord, so I simul 99% of the time. It saves a ton of time and when done correctly, can be safe. There are a few things that need to be done every time you simul rap: |
|
I don't see any real advantages to simul rapping. I've been to EPC a handful of times and done a fair amount of simul rapping there. EPC is definitely the most rappel intensive place I've been. At first I thought simul rapping was cool and quick but eventually went back to regular raps. |
|
there are different ways of simul-rapping. the gobright accident illustrates the fastest, but least safe version (ie no backups). with a stopper knot at the end of the rope and a backup at the climber the system becomes much safer (but sacrifices some of the speed aspect over no backups). |
|
Rapping down Royal Arches last year, my partner and i simuled, while are other friends did not. Started at the same time and beat them down by over an hour. When you get the the next anchor, each goes it to a bolt with a PAS. One starts the pull the rope and the other feeds it through and ties a stopped knot. When the climber that is pulling the rope gets to the middle the rope is already threaded there so you both put on your device and you're off. This might be mean, but anyone who says there is no speed advantage to simul rapping is not doing it right. |
|
I've always felt that the time saved simul-rapping is usually insignificant enough to be not worth the added risk. I've had partners ask to simul-rap from short (sometimes even single rappel pitches) routes numerous times, with plenty of daylight left, and I always decline. I can see the benefit in certain settings/situations, like EPC, but most of the time, not worth it. When I have done it, we obviously always tie knots in the end, use a rappel back up, stay close or tether to each other, etc. |
|
Daniel Melnyk wrote:One starts the pull the rope and the other feeds it through and ties a stopped knot. When the climber that is pulling the rope gets to the middle the rope is already threaded there so you both put on your device and you're off. Imagine it can take some time to pull in and knot the second end. |
|
hobo greg "The single biggest factor that’s overlooked is that normal rappelling allows the first climber down to be rigging the next rap." |
|
I have to agree with the OP that simul rapping feels both safest and quickest assuming it is done correctly. Tying knots and closing the system gets you 95% of the way there in terms of safety, and good communication and being in synch with your partner does the rest. You can also check your partner's rappel setup closely... in traditional rapping the second guy doesn't have anyone checking his rappel system. In addition, rapping on GriGri's is a lot faster, safer, and as OP stated it's also much safer (and quicker when bringing up the second) to belay with a grigi (that being said I never bring only a grigri on a multipitch). In situations where there is a lot of loose blocks it seems safer to not have one partner rapping above the other. And both climbers can manage their ends of the rope which, let's face it, is a cluster in most terrain. Don't really see the downsides... more weight on the anchor? you both go if the anchor fails? Would definitely love to hear more about others' experiences and situations where simul-rapping isn't appropriate. |
|
James S wrote: hobo greg "The single biggest factor that’s overlooked is that normal rappelling allows the first climber down to be rigging the next rap."Yeah, not much rigging to do with bolted rap anchors. Still, some rap routes require a bit of scrambling about to find and / or inspect the tat of the next rap anchor. |
|
Another (rare) instance that simul-rapping is basically required: counter-weight rappel off a formation with no rap anchor. |
|
Bill Lawry wrote: Yeah, not much rigging to do with bolted rap anchors. Still, some rap routes require a bit of scrambling about to find and / or inspect the tat of the next rap anchor. IMO, that's actually another (minor) advantage of simul-rapping: two pairs of eyes to search for the next anchor (and maybe anything else important, like the anchor after that), rather than the 1st rapper looking around and the person at the anchor being useless. I wouldn't oversell this or any other single advantage of simul-rapping, just my overall experience that simulling is faster/smoother. We didn't always tie knots in both ends; sometimes we'd only knot the end fed through the anchor, let the other end fall free without knot, and have the person with the knotted end rap first (i.e. somewhat below the other climber). I am now rethinking that strategy, and am thinking that maybe both sides of the rope saddle-bagged (and tied to climber) is a better way. Or, in any event, put a knot in both ends. |
|
..... in traditional rapping the second guy doesn't have anyone checking his rappel system.... |
|
Those comparing simul rappelling to single rappelling are assuming that the other parties (conditions) they are comparing themselves to are exactly the same. They are not. If you want a valid comparison compare against yourself on the same route with the same partner. Simul rap the first time then single rap the next time. Even then there will be variances that will affect the time taken. |
|
In addition to ensuring that the rope ends are knotted, and that a back up is used on each brake strand, does anyone else add the tether to connect the two climbers simul-rapping down at the same time? This was the way I was taught. It's also important to add this if there's a large weight discrepancy between the 2 climbers rappelling. |
|
Hobo Greg wrote: Threading through what? I'm talking about short (single pitch) towers with no fixed anchor at all, or bolts with no rings/chains right in the middle and not set up to rap off of. Like I said, rare (but not unheard of - I've done it twice). |
|
Daniel Melnyk wrote: The only time I don't simul-rap is when I'm using a pull cord, so I simul 99% of the time. It saves a ton of time and when done correctly, can be safe. There are a few things that need to be done every time you simul rap: I'm unsure how you can manage to save a 'ton of time' when you add in those safety measure and keeping communication extra clear the whole time. |
|
Pre-rigging rappels is my preferred method. It is faster AND safer than having the 2nd (3rd) rig after the first is 'off rappel'. I've never once thought that simul-rapping was worth the risk. When all mitigating techniques are employed simul rapping is still has the higher consequence. The bigger the route, the more chances to make mistakes; simul rapping increases the chance for catastrophic error. |
|
Hobo Greg wrote: Instead of tying a stopper knot in the end of the rope before you rap just tie a overhand on a bite and clip it to you. So when you get to the anchor there isn't any rope to pull up. Just unclip from the harness and feed it. And in a place like EPC this reduces the likelihood of the stopper knot getting stuck as you always maintain control of the end. Also makes it impossible to forget to untie the stopper knot when you pull the rope. Not sure why having the end clipped to you isn't just standard practice. |