M J wrote: the Rockfax Dolomites book does a good job including the Via Ferratas
No it does not do a "good job".
First it only has a small minority of the VF routes in the Dolomites.
The directions for the Parking were wrong on one I tried, so I wasted a lot of time and effort that day.
Third, the author is not mainly interested in VF, so does not have suffficient _context_ for assessing quality.
So at least two of the VF routes in that book are (to my taste) way off on quality, arguably three.
One of the VFs in the book where the quality rating makes sense is VF Cesco Tomaselli . . . (but that's a small sample).
- - > so get a dedicated VF guidebook written by someone who loves Via Ferratas. The best I know is the German-language from AlpenVerlag. The mainstream Engish-language guidebook from Cicerone is rather old-fashioned and wastes a lot of page space and text-reading time.
Fourth - (seems odd for a
climbing guidebook) - RockFax gives no serious assessment of the Protection quality of a VF in case a climber actually takes a _fall_.
Fifth - (seems odd for a
climbing guidebook) - RockFax has no awareness of
styles: climbing a VF route Free versus climbing it with Aid. Really for serious climbers there should be (at least) two diifficulty ratings: one for with AId, and the other for doing it Free.
Therefore . . .
To get more info on these last two points, when considering a VF route, try a search on:
* <name of VF route> site:roberts-1.com
or
* <name of VF route> kenr site:mountainproject.com
or
* <name of VF route> kenr site:ukclimbing.com
For quality and detailed descriptions and photos (assuming climb with the Aiding style).
* <name of VF route> kenr site:alavigne.net
Ken