Safe Anchor Building
|
|
|
YGD! theres a reason the crossloading specs are printed right on the biner. also no biner to biner, there should be something in between. also not a comfortable amount of redundancy |
|
OMG!! Thanks for the laugh! |
|
Can't see what the left arm of the anchor goes around. Anything? |
|
Kurt G. wrote:YGD! theres a reason the crossloading specs are printed right on the biner. also no biner to biner, there should be something in between. also not a comfortable amount of redundancySee, that's what I thought, but this was a setup on all of his anchors. This one seems to have too many lockers. |
|
1st pic could have used the orange cord instead of the yellow sling to make it longer and then not crossload the master point biner. |
|
Also that rope looks kinda Fat for a Micro-jul, must have been a pain to pull rope through it. |
|
YGD for a second reason too - the brake biner is clipped through the hanging biner on the belay device. If that crossloaded biner twists even a little, the brake biner won't allow the device to brake. |
|
speth wrote: See, that's what I thought, but this was a setup on all of his anchors. This one seems to have too many lockers.yeah haha. I was being a little sarcastic with my initial response, it doesn't look deadly but certainly not SERENE. have your buddy take an anchor class, just to clean things up a bit. |
|
Big problem I see is that if the right thread fails the whole anchor is going to swing left. Definitely not bomber enough for a shirtless whip. |
|
Besides the cross-loaded biner, the legs in that anchor are approaching a near horizontal orientation, which will multiply forces to each piece. Those slings should be extended to bring the angle between them under 90. The black and white sling has an erroneous figure 8, and the bights formed by the overhand are un-equalized. Why weren't that orange cord and large belay biner utilized? |
|
Priceless. |