Upgrading gear
|
Chaps,
Questions to you guys: What glove configuration do people use these days? Mitts, gloves, combination? Pants: my Patagonia Super Alpine Pants are so old and knackered. What should I get? Shell+fleece, or new school lycra type guide pants? Cheers Mathias |
|
I usually keep 2-3 pair of thin gloves on me, to swap out if/when they get wet or sweaty. I have a couple pair of Outdoor Research gloves that I love, but they have discontinued them. These look good - outdoorresearch.com/en/cata… |
|
Thanks. Appreciating your reply. More extra thin gloves seems like a good concept. |
|
Those Rambo crampons are classic, but are a solid one piece unit. Most have recommended upgrading to newer models that flex for the non-vertical-ice part of your journey. The bend in the crampon helps not strain the legs. I have never used Rambos, just something that stuck out. |
|
Faulted Geologist wrote:Those Rambo crampons are classic, but are a solid one piece unit. Most have recommended upgrading to newer models that flex for the non-vertical-ice part of your journey. The bend in the crampon helps not strain the legs. I have never used Rambos, just something that stuck out. Will search for a glove thread that got some great replies.I personally think that "most" are wrong here. Depends what your priority is. If you want maximum performance climbing vertical ice, fully rigid crampons still vastly outperform the flexible ones, IMO (I've had/used several pairs of both types and have >20yrs of WI experience). Now, if you're planning on doing more mixed climbing, flexible ones may provide better sensitivity. |
|
I've only ever climbed with crampons that are semi-flexible (BD, Cassin) and I've never noticed any performance problem with any flexing. This may be because I don't know any difference, but with a tight connection in the heel and toe bails I just don't see there being enough movement to be an issue. On the flip side, the Rambos look good and my usual climbing partner climbs about half the time in fully ridgid crampons and it doesn't seem to be an issue for him so I'm not sure it really makes a big difference one way or the other. |
|
Ryan Hamilton wrote:I've only ever climbed with crampons that are semi-flexible (BD, Cassin) and I've never noticed any performance problem with any flexing.I'd encourage you to try climbing with a fully rigid crampon on one foot and a flexible one on the other. I think you'll know what I'm talking about once you do (assuming you're using modern boots, not monster plastic mountaineering boots). You'll no doubt notice the flexible side feel "mushy" compared to the rigid side. BTW, this only holds if you're climbing real (somewhat virgin) ice where you need to kick, not stepping up stairs of pre-made foot placements in Ouray... (it's interesting to watch beginning ice climbers in Ouray these days... they hardly ever kick or even swing... no need on high traffic routes... cannot imagine what'll happen when they find themselves on backcountry ice). It's not that there's any problem or noticeable movement with flexible ones, but the energy transfer to the front point is much sharper (hence better penetration and less tendency to bounce) with rigid frames. |