Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
S-Curve - Upper Wall
Show routes:
Select route...
Bite the Wall 
Clean Underwear 
Geronimo 
Glenlivet 
Gravy Train 
High Dive 
Little Feat 
Megalopolis 
Skyscraper 
Teaming Metropolis 
Urban Sprawl 

Clean Underwear 

5.9

   

FA: Brian and Jonathon Smoot 1990
Type: Sport
Consensus: 5.9 [details]
Length: 1 pitch, 70 feet
Views: 448 page views

Submitted By: Nathan Fisher on Jun 8, 2003


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (14)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

Thomas at the start.


Description 

On the east end of The Upper Wall are many bolted lines. This is the 2nd from the east. It starts atop a small pedestal. It then climbs juggy roofs to the anchors.


Protection 

2 bolts for the anchors and 4 draws for the climb.



Add Photo Photos of Clean Underwear
Talia on the big roof of Clean Underwear.

Talia on the big roof of Clean Underwear.

Don't fall here or you'll deck on lead.  I suggest another bolt in between 2 and 3.

Don't fall here or you'll deck on lead. I suggest...


Add Comment Comments on Clean Underwear
Show which comments
By Lee Gitlin
May 13, 2004
rating: 5.9

The crux is right after the second bolt. We went right of the bolt. Lots of nice jugs and body position is helpful, since the route is steep. This route shares anchors with the .10a immediately west.

By Ryan Brough
From: Arvada, Colorado
Apr 29, 2006
rating: 5.9

As of 4/29/2006, there are separate anchors for Urban Sprawl (5.10a) to the left (west).

By Boissal
From: SLC, UT
Sep 8, 2006
rating: 5.9

There are so many chalked "holds" at the crux, it's not even funny any more. Last time i was warming-up on this route without paying too much attention to what I was doing and I did a long reach for something that was about as covered in chalk as this flake on one of the Gate boulders. I was expecting a bucket-sized jug, it turned out to be a sloppy old bulge that would have felt good on a 5.13... I decked on the ramp below and was almost too scared to get back up to retrive my draw before bailing...

By S. Gileadi
From: Salt Lake City
Jun 10, 2007
rating: 5.9

Weird.. those crappy chalked "holds" to the left at the crux seem to be a bit off the route anyway- follow the natural line between the bolts and ignore the chalk and you will be fine.

By icsteveoh
From: salt lake city, UT
Jul 23, 2007
rating: 5.9+ R

Whats with the spacy bolting on one of the harder parts of the climb with potential decking on the big boulder? Definitely don't try going left of the bolt or left up the roof makes it a lot harder and scarier.

By S. Gileadi
From: Salt Lake City
Jul 28, 2007
rating: 5.9

  • *warning- beta follows- ignore if you don't want any beta**

I don't usually like to post beta, but after doing this route again, I want to reiterate that despite all the chalk and enticing looking holds to the left at the crux, those holds are off route and if you go there, you the climbing gets much harder and there is potential to deck on the pedestal.

The 5.9 crux move is a balancy high step straight up towards the next bolt and it's low enough that I don't think you'd deck on the pedestal with a good belay. The reason that there is no chalk there is because the holds are down low and you have stand up without anything up high to reach the jugs above (balancy, but no harder than 5.9). Once this move is done with, it's easy jugsville until the next bolt.

If done correctly, this climb is not runout and the bolting makes sense.