Unnamed Face Problem V3-4
| 627 page views Good page? (1 like)  |
| Type: | Boulder, 12 feet |
| Consensus: | V4 [details] |
| FA: | [unknown] |
| Season: | Cool temps help a lot |
| Submitted By: | Bjorn on Dec 27, 2008 |
| |
You can get a better idea of the angle of it with ...
Add Photo Printer View
Description I first found this problem on one of the hottest days of the summer. I had rock shoes with me but no pad. I analyzed the face and its features, judging it hard but climbable. I palpated the starting holds and concluded that today was too hot and humid to consider attempting it padless. I decided to come back when it was cooler. I finally returned on Christmas Day and sent this excellent thin face climbing problem after a dozen tries or so. The problem consists of steep thin face climbing and a committing mantle topout. For holds you have edges that are sort of non-edges. More like faint bulbs of granite texture. Brute strength is unwelcome here. Delicacy and precision are the name of the game. Cryptic sequencing is also a barrier to the send, and I get the impression everyone who climbs this problem will employ slightly different moves.
Protection You'll want a pad. Not necessarily highball, but blowing the mantle topout would be painful.
Sure looks blank from here.
| | |
| Comments on Unnamed Face Problem |
|
By Derek Sullivan Sep 17, 2009 rating: V5
| Really awesome line. Typical North Shore sandbagging....this problem is considerably harder than V3. |
By Bjorn From: Near Joshua Tree Nov 10, 2009
| Sorry. Felt like the crux of a 5.11+ delicate face climb to me. V4 wouldn't be unreasonable, I suppose. |
By Derek Sullivan Dec 1, 2009 rating: V5
| Hahaha. No apology necessary. It's the North Shore way! Awesome problem regardless of numbers. |
By Rich Brereton From: Somerville, MA Nov 7, 2011 rating: V3
| Reminded me of JBMFP in J-Tree, but easier and not as highball. V3. Top out on the left. |
|