By Kat A From Bart and Lisa Ville, CO Feb 8, 2008
| What counter-muscle strength training do you do to help prevent or treat climbing related injuries?
I've been climbing around 2 years, and only recently my shoulders have been tweaked (front-upper area) - likely from going to the bouldering gym 2-3 days/week for the past couple of months. Talking to another climber at the Southern Sun the other evening (MP.com beer night) - he suggested push-ups and vertical-presses (not sure what the correct term is where you bench press but push the weight above your head while sitting or standing).
Until recently, I hadn't paid attention to strength training - and was instead focusing on improving technique. Though obviously I need to change that now... so I'm curious as to what other all-around counter-weight exercises are recommended for climbing. |  FLAG |
By Kevin Stricker From Evergreen, CO Feb 8, 2008
| I do a 15 minute Pilates workout 3 times a week to help strengthen the core and stretch out my body. The routine also targets the antagonistics, and support muscles (rotator cuff). My wife Lauri's book Pilates for the Outdoor Athlete is an excellent resource for climbers looking for muscle balancing exercises, as well as a quick workout that will strengthen your core. It is a great book and her Pilates for Climbers routines are excellent.
I used to use weights for training antagonistics, but I like my current routine better. It is fast and more effective at warming me up. Also watch the lateral raises, as they tend to really hammer your upper traps if you don't use good form.
Also it sounds like you are probably suffering from a small rotator cuff tear, I would get some therabands and start doing the rotator cuff excercises religiously. Those small muscles can shut your climbing down if you do not take care of them. Good Luck! |  FLAG |
By JamesW Feb 9, 2008
| push-ups and dips...lots of 'em on a daily basis. Reverse wrist curls work pretty well too. If you do "Vertical-Presses", be careful...it's easy to injure yourself if you technique isn't "perfect". To reduce the chance of injury be sure you do them as "Arnold-Presses" it will reduce the chance of injury to your shoulders...:Arnold-Presses" are done in a sitting position, but start with you palms facing you - then as you raise your arms rotate your palms outward so you finish with them facing away from your body. |  FLAG |
By Kat A From Bart and Lisa Ville, CO Feb 9, 2008
| Thanks Kevin and James! I'll be looking into your suggestions, including Lauri's book - I had considered yoga but Pilates could be really beneficial. -Kateri |  FLAG |
By Peter Spindloe Administrator From North Vancouver, BC Feb 9, 2008
| I suffered with elbow tendinitis for years and really had to limit training and had to cut many days at the crag short. It was pretty dispiriting and I came pretty close to just giving up climbing a number of times. About five years ago I started doing antagonist muscle exercises seriously, even though I had "known" for years before that they were supposed to be good for preventing problems like tendinitis. I wish I had started way earlier -- they have saved climbing for me.
I never used to be able to boulder, or up the training volume. Multi-day climbing trips were a frustrating balancing act. I'm now able to boulder, train hard three days per week and am finally seeing improvements after a very long (like ten years) plateau.
What exercises? At the did the following, and it made a huge difference:
1. Triceps extensions (either with the gym equipment where you put a v-bar or rope on the cable and straighten your arms with your elbows at your waist or with a free weight and your elbow pointing up to the ceiling).
2. Bench press with free weights.
3. Military or "Arnold Presses" as described above.
4. Reverse wrist curls.
Just like with any exercise routine you have to change it up -- doing the above for five years would be incredibly boring and wouldn't necessarily continue to provide benefit. Lately, thanks to the training program at my local gym, I've been using gymnastics rings to do:
1. Push-ups (you put the rings very close to the ground)
2. "Archers" which are like push ups, but as you lower yourself you extend one arm out the side and then as you push up you gradually bring it back in.
3. Dips.
The rings are strenuous, so don't try them until your injuries are healed, but they are great for shoulder stabilization and core strength.
I can also vouch for the value of Pilates as my wife and have been doing a one hour class once per week for the last year and a half. Again, you have to switch it up, because no matter how a hard a routine is, it'll get easy if you keep doing it, so we've changed levels and recently tried a different instructor and that has made it hard (i.e. beneficial) again. I'll have to pick up Kevin's wife's book.
Best of luck getting and staying healthy! It takes some trial-and-error to find what works for you, but it's worth it. |  FLAG |
By Stefanie Van Wychen From Westminster, CO Feb 9, 2008
| I would agree with pilates being a great way to strengthen the core - which helps immensely in applying climbing technique, and it's also low impact. But something is to be said for weight training which has the added benefit of strengthening bones (weight-bearing exercises), but can lead to repetitive motion injuries if you don't watch form and switch up exercises.
I definitely try to do triceps, but I find dips to be hard on my shoulders (I make sure not to go below parallel, but it still hurts) - plus I can't do unassisted dips as my triceps are weak. It's sad, I have these big biceps (great for climbing straight in hand cracks), but my triceps are puny - probably why I can't hold on to crimpers very well at my waist level while climbing. I usually do tricep extensions and those dips where you keep your feet on the ground on the edge of a bench. I also do bench press with free weights for chest and reverse wrist curls too. Push ups on the big stability ball are also great for both core and chest.
Good luck! I don't have the same pain as you in the shoulders but I have had them give out while bouldering (I've had them both momentarily dislocated while playing soccer) - but I do get pain in my shoulders when doing some tricep exercises - so be careful.
If you ever want to go climbing - shoot me an email - I'd love to actually climb with other women! |  FLAG |
By Avery N From Boulder, CO Feb 9, 2008
| Pilates is a great routine for core strengthening... but, will it really counter-balance the issues in your shoulders? Maybe, but doesn't sound as likely. If I had to guess, I'd guess core strength isn't your issue. Call it a personal hunch. Then again, Kevin's talking about 45 minutes a week.
Maybe it's a genuine shoulder strength (but not muscle mass) issue, or futhermore, a muscle imbalance with pecs/front of the shoulder for a strong back. Massage might help, if you've not had any lately?
Curious... are you stretching before you climb? If not, maybe try some shoulder and pec stretches before your next few sessions... just brainstorming here. If you find that helps, yoga with the right instructor (which is kinda key) will not only help with the flexibility/limberness/posture, but also has the value-added benefit of de-stressing ones mind (!)... I never got that source of relaxation from my short exposure to Pilates, but others might.
-A |  FLAG |
By Wes Murray Feb 9, 2008
| I've had awesome success with Pilates and Yoga. While Pilates typically is "core" focused, performing a good routine has the benefit of diverting training time to "balancing" exercises, rather then doing more climbing, which is the cause of the problem to begin with. Often, when presented with the choice of whether to use the alloted time to climb vs. train opposing muscles, stretch, etc., we often tend to choose climbing at the long-term detriment of our overall climbing ability.
If you want a really great yoga routine that is power and tricep/chest focused, and avoids all the renew-age guruism, check out the Power-Yoga (Ashtanga yoga) book by Beryl Bender-Berch. It has a great routine that you can cycle through that will leave you burning.
Another option is to check out the Thera-Band website for the exercises that focus on the rotator cuff. These are great for helping to prevent blown-out shoulders.
Hope this helps!! Happy climbing!! |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 11, 2008
| Kateri,
Many people have given you some great ideas (although I do believe you should be doing lower body strength training as well--wait until you strain a hamstring on a heel hook or sprain an MCL during a drop knee to wonder why I recommend this).
However, many of the recommendations here work just fine for healthy shoulder joints and musculature; BUT-- I would suspect by the location of your pain that you have either a rotator cuff issue or bicipital tendonitis. Pain is commonly felt in the front of the shoulder with RC injuries and with BT. A doctor would need to determine which problem you have. They are often associated to boot--i.e. BT can result due to RC damage.
Most people I see doing rotator cuff exercises on their own with no original instruction from a health care provider or educated trainer do them incorrectly--sometimes profoundly incorrectly. If you don't want this problem to become worse, it would probably be worth your time to visit your doctor and get some instruction from him/her on what you need to do and/or visit a physical therapist once or twice.
If you do, indeed, have RC injuries right now, I would DEFINITELY AVOID doing things suggested like push ups, shoulder presses, front or side raises, dips, and many yoga poses, esp. ones like downward dog. THESE WILL ONLY MAKE YOUR PROBLEMS WORSE until you have sufficiently recovered your shoulder stabilizer strength.
Also, someone suggested stretching before you climb. I definitely DISAGREE--especially if you have a rotator cuff injury!!! First of all, stretching injured tendons will serve to make your problems WORSE by further de-stabilizing your joint and damaging your connective tissue. Secondly, I never recommend people stretch before climbing (or any other performance activity) anyway--the majority of the literature coming out in the last 5+ years shows strong evidence that people suffer profound DECREASES IN POWER AND STRENGTH when they stretch prior to physical activities. Stretching healthy tissue should be reserved for post-activity periods.
Don't get rutted in thinking rotator cuff injuries just "go away"; like a bad nightmare, they come back again and again w/out treatment. Good luck. |  FLAG |
By Joey Wolfe Feb 11, 2008
| Kateri Ahrendt wrote: I've been climbing around 2 years, and only recently my shoulders have been tweaked (front-upper area)
I had the exact same problem, mine was BT. And as stated above exercise can futher damage your shoulder. I strongly recommend you stop climbing for at least six weeks, I did and it really helped. I didn't start with counter muscle exercise till after the six weeks. Also, part of my problem was that i needed to lose about 5 or more pounds(you couldn't tell by looking at me). So i focused on cardio during my break(lots of hiking with and with out a weighted pack & jogging), lost a little weight, and then slowly got back into climbing while doing some LIGHT weight training. It has been over a month since the 6 week break and I feel stronger than ever. As hard as it is for climbers to rest, it is probably the best thing for it.
Oh, and defiantly go see a Doc and I agree with throwing pilates into your plan. |  FLAG |
By Alexandra Feb 11, 2008
| Couldn't add anything useful, except to be careful.
Case in point: My right shoulder blade is currently loose (due to climbing, weird story), and inhibiting my right arm's strength. Since not climbing has never been an option for me, I've been trying to compensate for my injury with my left arm, which has, naturally, led to a fun new pain in that shoulder as well.
If I had taken the time to heal in September and fore-go the rest of the climbing season last fall, I'm pretty sure I would have been fine by now. However, I thought I could just put less pressure/force/weight on my right arm and use my left arm instead...and now I've really got a problem on my hands...shoulders...arms...haha
This is just to say, be careful not to over-do things, thinking you aren't really injured that badly, as I had presumed. Physical therapy may be a good option if you're recommended to it, because they can help you develop your strength and you'll have consistent advice from a professional. |  FLAG |
By Kat A From Bart and Lisa Ville, CO Feb 11, 2008
| Thanks to everyone for your input. I'm taking a couple weeks off from the bouldering gym and will see a doctor. When the timing is right I'll be working on yoga/pilates/counter-muscle strengthening/PT - whatever it takes. I really didn't anticipate shoulder issues since my arms have always been kinda beefy for a woman my size, I'm not overweight, and I've been climbing consistently rather than just throwing myself gung-ho into bouldering. Perhaps this is a good time to focus on leggy sports like hiking & snowshoeing (which my dogs will appreciate). -Kateri |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 11, 2008
| Kateri Ahrendt wrote: I really didn't anticipate shoulder issues since my arms have always been kinda beefy for a woman my size, I'm not overweight, and I've been climbing consistently rather than just throwing myself gung-ho into bouldering.
Yeah, unfortunately these kind of preconceptions really have nothing to do with why people get rotator cuff injuries, impingement syndromes, bicipital tendonitis, shoulder bursitis, and so on. Rather, they are a function of overuse, especially in overhead athletes (which climbers are, although not in the traditional sense we think of), sometimes there is a lack of good, general, all around conditioning and fitness in the joint musculature, anatomical predispositions, and there is always a fundamental strength ratio imbalance between the joint's stabilizers and the joint's primary movers--which has nothing to do with your weight, arm size, etc.
Word, chica--go have fun with da dogs! |  FLAG |
By NjC Feb 13, 2008
| Eyes Of Green wrote: I never recommend people stretch before climbing (or any other performance activity) anyway--the majority of the literature coming out in the last 5+ years shows strong evidence that people suffer profound DECREASES IN POWER AND STRENGTH when they stretch prior to physical activities. Stretching healthy tissue should be reserved for post-activity periods.
These words have been stuck in my head the last few days! I find it hard to believe that stretching before any activity would be discouraged. By no means am I an expert in this area, but I stretch 1-2 times/day, regardless of but always before and after climbing, strength or aerobic exercise, though I do like to warm up a little first. Maybe it's just the wear & tear accured through the ages (no longer "healthy" tissue?), but my body tells me it appreciates it greatly! I feel energized and ready to move after stretching because I have worked out the little aches & kinks in muscles that clearly would leave me less able to execute a particular movement.
If there is a decrease in power & strenghth, I wonder how significant it really is, if it is offset by a gain in flexible muscles that are ready to work, and because of this, are less likely to be injured?
Any thoughts? |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Feb 13, 2008
| Eyes Of Green wrote: I never recommend people stretch before climbing (or any other performance activity) anyway--the majority of the literature coming out in the last 5+ years shows strong evidence that people suffer profound DECREASES IN POWER AND STRENGTH when they stretch prior to physical activities. Stretching healthy tissue should be reserved for post-activity periods.
NjC wrote: These words have been stuck in my head the last few days! I find it hard to believe that stretching before any activity would be discouraged. By no means am I an expert in this area, but I stretch 1-2 times/day, regardless of but always before and after climbing, strength or aerobic exercise, though I do like to warm up a little first. Maybe it's just the wear & tear accured through the ages (no longer "healthy" tissue?), but my body tells me it appreciates it greatly! I feel energized and ready to move after stretching because I have worked out the little aches & kinks in muscles that clearly would leave me less able to execute a particular movement. If there is a decrease in power & strenghth, I wonder how significant it really is, if it is offset by a gain in flexible muscles that are ready to work, and because of this, are less likely to be injured? Any thoughts? I'm also a little perplexed by E of G's comments. Perhaps the issue has to do with stretching to prepare muscles and joints for activity vs. stretching to increase range of motion...? I would agree that stretching when completely cold could be a problem, even to the point of causing acute injury, but I also feel like light stretching is OK after about 10 minutes or so of some kind of warm-up (e.g., light jogging). However, heavy stretching to improve range of motion should probably be reserved for the end of the activity, as suggested by E of G. Any thoughts E...? |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 13, 2008
| Hi NjC and Richard,
Yes, whenever I make statements like these, it's very, very difficult for people to accept since for so long we have been told and believed that stretching prevents injury and makes for a good "warm up" somehow. But, unfortunately, flexibility science is one of the least researched topics in the exercise science realm; therefore, as more studies are finally getting funded and carried out, the evidence has begun confounding such long held beliefs! (which, apparently, were based on virtually nothing all these years--since they probably originated long before research into stretching even began!)
However, many individual studies + a recent meta-analysis now strongly point to the following evidence:
1) Static stretching does zero to prepare a body for physical activity--it is NOT a warm up
2) Static stretching prior to physical activities that involve muscular strength and/or power outputs actually DECREASES performance
3) Static ranges of motion do not appear to correlate with an individual's dynamic flexibility, although the relationship (or lack of) is not well understood
4) Static stretching does not appear to prevent injury in most sports
This is not to say static stretching is useless or unnecessary. I still do it myself and recommend it, but I only do it after aerobic activities when my muscles are very warm but I have already cooled down (i.e. heart rate is resting).
Athletes tend to see the best performance when they engage in a dynamic, multi-planar warm up that progresses in intensity and which includes dynamic stretching only, not static stretching. (Endurance athletes who perform in primarily single planes of movement [like runners, cyclists, and swimmers] may not typically need to warm up in the same kinds of drills used by athletes in more complex and multi-dimensional movements).
NjC wrote: If there is a decrease in power & strenghth, I wonder how significant it really is, if it is offset by a gain in flexible muscles that are ready to work, and because of this, are less likely to be injured?
It can be SIGNIFICANT--up to 10% decrease in power output!!
No, it is not offset by any flexibility gains. No, there is no evidence that it has a protective effect against injury. There is little evidence to suggest that stretching before activity increases measurable flexibility over the long term, anyway. Further, static stretching in no way increases blood flow to the muscle or increases core body temperature or heart rate--all of which are signs the body is "ready to work."
Light stretching after a warm up may be reasonable if you are planning to do rhythmic, aerobic-type exercise. Otherwise, I would forego it and do a better, more comprehensive warm up that mainly includes dynamic stretching. (Most people don't think of dynamic stretching as "stretching," however, although technically it is.)
Hope that helps explain things a bit better! =) |  FLAG |
By Avery N From Boulder, CO Feb 13, 2008
| Eyes Of Green wrote: as more studies are finally getting funded and carried out, the evidence has begun confounding such long held beliefs! (which, apparently, were based on virtually nothing all these years--since they probably originated long before research into stretching even began!) However, many individual studies + a recent meta-analysis now strongly point to the following evidence: 1) Static stretching does zero to prepare a body for physical activity--it is NOT a warm up 2) Static stretching prior to physical activities that involve muscular strength and/or power outputs actually DECREASES performance 3) Static ranges of motion do not appear to correlate with an individual's dynamic flexibility, although the relationship (or lack of) is not well understood 4) Static stretching does not appear to prevent injury in most sports
So, I am curious to learn more about this -- as it contraticts what we were raised to believe. In some aspects, it also contradicts some of the proposed benefits of long-term stretching such as yoga.
Can you cite the sources so we can locate and read the articles ourselves? |  FLAG |
By NjC Feb 13, 2008
| Yes, I'd love a reference to some of these studies, too.
Also, I find myself confused with the terminology, ie, how would you define static vs. dynamic multi-planar stretching, and Richard, your differentiation between light and heavy stretching.
If stretching does not promote increased flexibility, what does? And why is it people who stretch often can demonstrate much more flexibility than those who do not.
And why am I able to relieve little muscle aches by gently stretching? Again, when I stretch out the tight spots after a light warm up, I feel less pain and more fluid in my movements, whatever they may be.
It's an interesting topic and I appreciate the responses! |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Feb 13, 2008
| NjC wrote: ...and Richard, your differentiation between light and heavy stretching. What I meant was that "light" is when you gently and repetitively move a joint through its range of motion, but without trying to extend its range of motion. I think this is what EoG means by "dynamic" stretching. Imagine rolling your hands around before climbing or doing gentle "windmills" with your entire arm. There's a similar thing I do with my knees before running which seems to really help my abused knees quite a lot. I think the idea is to get the juices flowing, so to speak, to prepare the joint for what's to come. "Heavy" stretching is what I think EoG means by "static" stretching; i.e., when you're doing the touch-your-toes kind of thing to improve range of motion, and which should be done only when your body is pretty warm. |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 13, 2008
| Avery Nelson wrote: So, I am curious to learn more about this -- as it contraticts what we were raised to believe. In some aspects, it also contradicts some of the proposed benefits of long-term stretching such as yoga. Can you cite the sources so we can locate and read the articles ourselves?
Avery, are the proposed benefits of long term yoga things objectively studied or things espoused by people who have a vested interest in people doing more yoga? Most of the studies I've seen on yoga have to do with its effects on management of chronic illness, not sport performance. Likewise, most of the benefits I've seen advertised are by people who make their living somehow through yoga. (Not saying it doesn't have benefits, however.)
Njc wrote: Also, I find myself confused with the terminology, ie, how would you define static vs. dynamic multi-planar stretching
Static stretching is just what it sounds like: you hold a stretch statically for x amount of time. What most people think of as "stretching," in other words.
Dynamic stretching involves moving a joint dynamically through its range of motion. For instance, dynamically stretching your shoulder could involve swinging it (in a controlled manner) into furthest flexion and extension, horizontal abduction and adduction, etc. Another example-- a common dynamic stretching technique used to complete the warm up of professional baseball players is the tin soldier drill (which I also use when warming up my lower body to lift in the gym): walking while extending each leg like a tin soldier during the step forward. This is a dynamic stretch for the hamstrings and calves (and glutes to some degree)--an excellent way to prepare the body for explosive power output involving the lower body but w/out the detrimental effects a static stretch to the hamstrings would cause.
Dynamic multi-planar warm up drills are those which do not just utilize one plane of motion (jogging or biking are examples of non-multi-planar warm ups). Since many sports and exercises require us to move our joints not just front to back, but also side to side and in twisting (transverse) motions, we need to give them a similar warm up for optimal performance. Joints have receptors that monitor "where they are in space" in order to provide us with our kinesthetic awareness. They seem to provide better feedback to our brains when we provide them with initial stimulus in multiple planes of movement. Climbers already often do extremely specific, multi-planar warm ups unconsciously by climbing easy, "warm up" routes before they get down to business. Unless a route is a jug haul, they will probably have done movements in their warm up route that include moving straight up, moving sideways, and twisting--wah la! Multi-planar.
Additionally, there are other types of stretching which are more complex like proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, contract/relax/agonist contract (CRAC), etc., but I won't get into that! ;-)
NjC wrote: If stretching does not promote increased flexibility, what does? And why is it people who stretch often can demonstrate much more flexibility than those who do not.
Stretching appears to promote flexibility when it is done as a separate activity with time and focus put on it, esp. after the muscles have become warm and pliable. Stretching "cold" muscles results in virtually no change in long term resting length of the muscle. Stretching muscles when they are very warm (i.e. why I do it after cardio workouts) and as a separate activity unto itself is what research tends to find promotes long term flexibility, i.e. long term changes in resting muscle length. When I stretch after a workout with the goal as being just to stretch, you better believe I put a lot more time and effort into it than what I see people do when they use it as a so-called warm up.
NjC wrote: And why am I able to relieve little muscle aches by gently stretching? Again, when I stretch out the tight spots after a light warm up, I feel less pain and more fluid in my movements, whatever they may be.
Stretching typically always feel good, regardless of whether it actually improves your performance in whatever activity you're doing directly afterwards. And its effects on muscle pain are not the same as my initial point--in fact, they are totally separate topics. However, if you don't care about possible performance decrements and you like how pre-activity stretching makes you feel, it's unlikely to harm you. However, consider that perhaps your warm up routine is sub-optimal and, if you were to have a different or better one, you would feel just as fluid and energized, while still maintaining your stretching routine post-activity for its additional benefits on muscle tension/aches.
I will provide you guys with some links later once I have the time to locate them! |  FLAG |
By NjC Feb 14, 2008
| Those clarifications are helpful, but also new thinking for me (which translates into I'm interested but need to learn a little more and apply it to my situation). Some dynamic or light stretching movements were actually passed on to me recently as a pre-climbing routine. Stretching for pain or tight muscles does make sense as an different objective.
To the person who posted and deleted the post: You may have re-thought the how or what of the thoughts posted, and I respect that, but there were a couple concepts thrown out I had wanted to google and didn't take the time to write them down.
If anyone has other thoughts, opinions, references, or specific pre-climb routines, I'd love to hear about them! |  FLAG |
By Kevin Stricker From Evergreen, CO Feb 14, 2008
| Sorry for the delete, thought the post was a bit on the negative side and I saw that EoG had clarified her position.
I believe the research that is being spoken of is in regards to the activation of your spindle fiber reflex, also called your golgi reflex. This is a biofeedback mechanism that keeps you from straining a muscle, when it gets stretched to a certain point the spindle fiber causes a muscular contraction to counter the stretch.
Research has been shown that the activation of this spindle fiber can effect intra muscular coordination or recruitment, and hence power. BUT the research that I have read is specific to the glutials and hamstrings and the effect on your ability to do squats.
Honestly, my feeling is that coming onto a climbing forum and saying that stretching decreases power is a BIG oversimplification. Have you seen any research on stretching specific to climbers? Or how about static stretching effecting isometric contractions of forearm flexors?
Let's face it, if we can stretch to help warm up our joints and possibly avoid injury (hamstring pull, etc.) then it is a worthwile endevor. Climbing is not a strength based sport, it is a movement based sport. I would go as far as to say that decreasing the recruitment in any muscles but the forearm flexors, could actually HELP performance in most people because it could also lead to an increase in blood flow which high recruitment hinders. |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 14, 2008
| Kevin Stricker wrote: I believe the research that is being spoken of is in regards to the activation of your spindle fiber reflex, also called your golgi reflex. This is a biofeedback mechanism that keeps you from straining a muscle, when it gets stretched to a certain point the spindle fiber causes a muscular contraction to counter the stretch.
Muscle spindles are not the same thing as Golgi Tendon Organs (GTOs). They appear similar but still have quite different functions. But no, the meta-analysis I speak of is not specifically examining these things.
Kevin wrote: Honestly, my feeling is that coming onto a climbing forum and saying that stretching decreases power is a BIG oversimplification. Have you seen any research on stretching specific to climbers? Or how about static stretching effecting isometric contractions of forearm flexors? Let's face it, if we can stretch to help warm up our joints and possibly avoid injury (hamstring pull, etc.) then it is a worthwile endevor.
May I repeat that stretching is NOT a warm-up activity (see my definition of "warm up" in a previous post), nor do the majority of physical therapists, athletic trainers, and strength and conditioning coaches (among others) today feel that stretching just prior to activity does anything whatsoever to reduce injury. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR THIS. (Keep in mind I am not speaking of long term, non-acute stretching. There is a distinction.)
Of course there is no research on climbers; climbers will never receive much interest because they do not provide arenas for lots of money to be made on performance outcomes. Does that mean that principles of exercise physiology, biomechanics, and exercise science in general do not apply to them? Of course not.
The research that is delving into this issue on flexibility looks into parameters and tests that assess components of sport performance. This is a valid assessment method to determine possible influences on actual sport performance since kinematics is driven by kinetics. It's pretty hard to interpret kinematics if you have no understanding of what comprises and affects their kinetics.
Kevin wrote: Climbing is not a strength based sport, it is a movement based sport. I would go as far as to say that decreasing the recruitment in any muscles but the forearm flexors, could actually HELP performance in most people because it could also lead to an increase in blood flow which high recruitment hinders.
I never understand people like you who think strength plays little to no role in climbing. Completely untrue. First of all, EVERY sport is a movement-driven sport when you come down to it; some are simply more complex than others (like climbing). Some require more absolute strength and some, like climbing, require relative strength. But again, kinematics is driven by kinetics; to quote another: "it's a fundamental rule of biomechanics." This is not to downplay the importance of technique, but if you were able to keep all the climbing-related motor memory and skill acquisition intact in someone but reduce their relative strength by 50%, you better believe their climbing performance will be greatly affected.
As for decreased recruitment improving performance: huh?? You either did not explain that well or you missed the boat on that particular topic. Anyway, why acute stretching appears to hinder power outputs is not fully understood and may have absolutely nothing to do with motor recruitment.
With all due respect, Kevin, your comments indicate to me that perhaps you don't have a complete understanding of the interactions and principles of motor learning, biomechanics, and exercise physiology here. (Not putting you down, please don't think that; just being objective.) |  FLAG |
By Aerili From Reno, NV Feb 14, 2008
| Although I think this thread is now getting a bit off topic, for interested parties, here is a news release of the 2004 meta-analysis performed by Dr. Ian Shrier in the Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine: http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/507154/. I find the meta-analysis a nice tool to use because they try to pick as many high quality, peer-reviewed research studies as possible and analyze the data in a more aggregate way. If you want to see more studies on this, you can find the references within the meta-analysis, and do further searches on Google for similar articles.
With regard to stretching's effects on injury, here is a nice excerpt that goes very much into detail about this topic: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/medicine/bmj/sportsmedici>>>>>.
Another look at one of the largest studies on stretching and injury outcomes (which used a sample size of 2000 army recruits) is here: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=12>>>>>
The thing to understand about how injuries are usually sustained and why stretching (esp. acute stretching) may possibly be of little relevance is
1) Stretching creates a muscle-tendon unit that is more compliant. A more compliant muscle means that it will elongate sooner with less force applied. However, greater compliance is not necessarily related to a tissue's ability to withstand injury.
2) Most injuries are not sustained in extreme ranges of motion. In fact, most injuries happen within completely normal ranges of motion during situtions when the muscle is undergoing eccentric contraction. Stretching or not stretching seems, therefore, to be of little relevance in what "creates" injury.
|  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Feb 14, 2008
| Eyes Of Green wrote: Muscle spindles are not the same thing as Golgi Tendon Organs (GTOs). They appear similar but still have quite different functions. I'll go one step further and say that they do not even appear similar. They're located in different places (GTO = at connection between tendon and muscle; MS = embedded in muscle tissue). Their structure and the way they are activated is also different. And, as you implied, they relay different kinds of information: GTO = degree of tension on a muscle; MS = length and rate of change of length in a muscle.
Obviously, these sensory receptors come into play during stretching. I'm certainly no kinesiologist, but I would think that the GTO plays a much greater role, especially in static stretching, since it is part of an inhibitory reflex loop.
EDIT: I wouldn'y worry asbout going off-topic. Many of these threads get really interesting when they go off-topic, as long as the "off" doesn't turn into a flame-fest. |  FLAG |
By Kevin Stricker From Evergreen, CO Feb 14, 2008
| Aerili, I find it interesting that you took that position based on the research you provided. Maybe we are saying the same thing, but to me ROM stretching is still stretching, and it was listed in one of the articles as believed to decrease the risk of injury. Also working a joint through its ROM helps in the release of synovial fluid does it not? So are you saying that ROM stretching does not have a positive effect or do you not consider this stretching?
As I said, the effect of deep static stretching decreasing your recruitment is not something I disagree with. Also when I was studying Kinesiology ( 15 years ago) the spindle reflex was believed to be tied to the golgi reflex. Sounds like maybe research has seperated their functions? I do have degrees in both Biology and Chemistry and have read many texts related to climbing performance, so I am not ignorant in regards to this subject, but do not claim to be an expert by any means.
As for decreased recruitment helping climbing performance, I will say it again...Decreasing a muscles recruitment can actually HELP climbing performance. In most route climbing maximal recruitment take a backseat role to power endurance and vascularity. When you increase a muscles ability ro recruit it's fibers you also increase the propensity for complete capilary contraction from this highly recruited state. As psychological factors also come into play, the ability to "crush" a hold can make you pumped much faster than if you hold with minimal effort. This is why people who spend a large ammount of time bouldering often get spanked on routes that technically should be very easy for them.
As for your argument that "Kinetics drives Kinematics" this is quite obvious another oversimplification. In this one dimentional world, the strongest climbers would be the best climbers, which is obviously not the case. I can also tell you from personal experience that I have seen increases in my climbing ability when I have decreased my focus on climbing strength. I obviously do not think this holds true all the time, but climbing is primarily a technical sport. OK enough for getting off topic! I can be relatively sure that this is not a matter we will ever see eye to eye with.
Pilates BTW is primarily focused on active ROM, and as such I feel it is an excellent tool for warming up. |  FLAG |
|