|1,342 page views|
Getting in some final climbing before the the ligh...
Climb the rampy north ridge to its top, and then make a wild step across to the main summit. This is a very cool, strange route on crumbly rock-definitely one of the better 5.2 routes you'll ever do.
A ranger watched me climb this and didn't yell, so I don't think it is closed. It may very well be, however, since many of the rangers are pretty laid back about the rules and might not have tried to enforce the closure.
Not much-the rock is chossy and hard to protect. Bring a few medium to large cams. Fixed anchor to rap on top.
The non-5.2 start.
|By Anonymous Coward|
Oct 28, 2001
I'm pretty sure this one is still open. My wife and I climbed it on 10/20/01, and there were several rock scramblers in the chimney who received warning from the rangers, but we didn't here a peep. Indeed the pro is hard to come by.... I found a couple of tri-cam placements 2 and 2.5, I think and slung a few of the large flakes, but I'm glad I didn't have to test any of them. An interesting climb, seldom more than two feet wide -- very airy.
|By Brian Wandzilak|
Apr 15, 2003
What a goofy arse route. I put in one cam before the "window" and that created more problems than is was worth. This route was out there. Maybe good practice for route finding? It really forces you to look around and see the inobvious sections. Pull on the flakes, smear the feet and work your way up to the top. Ride the ridge cowboy style and belay the second. Not near as spectacular as its neighbor to the east. But, if there is a line for Montezuma's Tower, and there is nothing else to do, and if you don't mind sparse pro on a psychologically "tough" route give The Window a try.
|By Jon Cannon|
Apr 18, 2003
Right after the window is a travers across an unprotected ledge which is the technical and psychological "crux" (to the extent that anything at 5.2 can be considered a crux) of the route. A slip on the traverse would wreck someone's day. Has anyone figured out a good placement for some protection on the traverse?
|By Lance Bischoff|
Oct 4, 2003
Best thing to know, besides other comments already mentioned, is the actual "quality" of the rock. The traverse is not technically difficult, but I found a LOT of loose stuff on both hands and feet, many times flaking off during the moves. This makes for a non-smiling traverse without the pro. Not a bomb route, but no 3-star IMHO. The "closure" issue may relate to Garden-wide policy of off-limits to scramblers more than 10 feet off deck. This formation gets lots of violating scramblers who tackle the easy chimney on south end and stare at you as to why you needed any ropes/gear at all when they meet you at or near summit.
|By Leo Paik|
From: Westminster, Colorado
Dec 7, 2003
Perhaps due to erosive changes, c/w S Ridge, White Spire; N Ridge, Montezuma's; Potholes, Red Twin; this route feels 5.2+++ or 5.6/5.7 at the end of the traverse. Being shorter than 5'7" may make it feel even 'arder. Not the best route for a beginner 2nd.
|By Evan Pilant|
Mar 26, 2004
The traversing "crux" is unprotectable with gear, but the window and the thigh high rail will catch you if you fall, but the crux isn't hard, it is just a little scary. My personal experience is that you should build a small anchor and bring up your second right after the crux. This reduces rope drag and makes the climb to the summit A LOT easier. As a warning to anyone who doesn't enjoy rapping off old rusty pitons, once you make the step across and to the summit, you cant back down, and the piton anchor looks 50 years old on the top. It's still safe, it's just a little scary. EXCELLENT EXPOSURE ON THE SUMMIT!!
|By Darin Lang|
Aug 26, 2004
I'm not certain that this is the appropriate place to post this information, but there was a fatality on this route yesterday. See www.thedenverchannel.com/news/3681896/detail.html
The climbing community still seems pretty small to me, and every time this happens I feel like I lost a good friend that, by mere quirk of fate, I just haven't met yet. My condolences to his friends and family.
Also, this is an opportunity for us all to remind ourselves that (1) one can never let one's guard down, no matter what the route, and (2) climb somewhere other than the Garden when it has rained.
|By Bill Parmenter|
Aug 29, 2004
Echo your sentiments Darin but need to make a correction to your comments. This route is on the north ridge. The fatality occured on the south ridge of the summit fin. To the best of my knowledge the south ridge is not documented as a route in any of the guide books. While "The Window Route" is indeed quite chossy, the south routes are even more so. I can not think of any rock in "The Garden" that is more fragile than the south ridges of "Three Graces". Mark, I never met you, but, like Darin, I grieve your loss.
|By Dan Russell|
Aug 30, 2004
I heard he was on the west face, but that may not be correct. Either way, he was attempting to lead some of the loose topropes, not advisable. I met him a few years ago briefly, but didn't really know him. Heard he was a good person, though, tragic.
|By Dave G|
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Jun 11, 2008
A funky and fun little climb that we did today after finishing Montezuma's Tower. I thought the most difficult move was climbing up the first hump before the window. We were not able to protect the traverse after the window, but it was easy with good holds. There were two very solid large bolts on top with a chain between them for rappeling.
|By Phil Lauffen|
Jul 1, 2008
Climbed this route this morning. managed to place some tri cams and some slings around a couple flakes. Also used a #2 and 0.75 cam. Good route, lots of exposure on top. There's a lot of ways to through/around the window, but we found it was good to belay the second up after the crux. Reduces rope drag. Airy straddle on the ridge. Both me and my partner thought it felt harder than a 5.2-- Maybe 5.4. The rock is crumbly and there aren't bomb proof holds.
|By Chris Zeller|
From: Boulder, CO
Nov 21, 2008
Very fun and classic route. As good as it gets at 5.2. I didn't think the rock was any softer or loose than any other Garden climb. I also think it protects quite well. I'm not sure how you are "supposed to" climb this but after gaining the first hump I broke left though the arch/hole rather than traversing around. I found this to be easier, but it did generate some rope drag. Maybe this is where others found all the loose rock?
Before you move across the chasim to the summit, there is excellent protection under a bulge. I think I placed 2 pieces here then found another cam in the opposite wall after stepping over. Exposure YES (and fun too) but not sketchy. A must do route for any moderate leader.