Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
Mule Hollow Wall
Patagonia Women's Solar Wind Jacket

$249.00 29% off

$174.30

at Patagonia

237    more...
Outdoor Research Crocodiles Gaiter - Men's

$74.95 40% off

$44.97

at Backcountry

3    more...
Blackburn Atom SL 6.0 Cyclometer

$89.99 25% off

$67.49

at AlsSports

73    more...
Metolius Greatest Chips Bolt On 30pk.

$55.95 34% off

$36.37

at Backcountry

2    more...
Mammut Phoenix SuperDry Climbing Rope - 8mm

$199.95 42% off

$115.97

at Backcountry

35    more...
Sugoi RPM Jersey - Women's

$64.99 20% off

$51.99

at AlsSports

6    more...
Women's Force

$129.00 30% off

$89.95

at WildernessX

19    more...
Ultralight Combi Crampons

$139.95 25% off

$104.96

at CampSaver

12    more...
Anasazi Hi-Top Climbing Shoe - Men's

$169.95 29% off

$118.97

at CampSaver

120    more...
 more Dirtbag Deals
Routes Sorted
L to R R to L Alpha
Center Face 
Down, Dirty, Doublecrossed 
Everything And Nothing 
Explorien 
Glasnost 
Ground Glass, The 
High on Crack 
Implorien 
Jam Crack Route 
Left of Center Route 
Ravages Of Time 
Sands of Time, The 

The Sands of Time 

5.9+

   
1,148 page views
Good page? (1 like)   

Type: Sport, 1 pitch, 90 feet, Grade III
Consensus: 5.10a [details]
FA: Patrick Maloney Alex Angam and George Rosenthal Sept. 27 th 2009
New Route: Yes
Season: spring,summer and fall
Submitted By: Patrick Maloney on Oct 6, 2009

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (7)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]

From the anchors on "Sands of time". In the ruckma...

Add Photo  Add Comment    Printer View

Description 

This route is located thirty feet to the left of Ravages of time. Climb what looks to be the smoothest section of the wall. Small edges and some high steppin past seven bolts brings one up to a two bolt belay.
The rock quality is superb!
Enjoy!


Location 

This route is on the Sea of Glass Wall, just south of and downhill from the main mule hollow wall.


Protection 

seven draws



Photos of The Sands of Time Slideshow Add Photo
The view from up top

The view from up top


Comments on The Sands of Time Add Comment
Show which comments
By ddriver
From: SLC
Jun 20, 2011

This will be a great route once you guys put the first two bolts in... ;).

Felt like 11 slab to me getting through the first two bolts, tenuous and awkward. So much so I backed off on lead, TR'ed it, and still didn't enjoy the opening moves. I'll bypass the bolted start to the right next time and pro the flake on the right, even though that sucks, too. Really good up high, so well worth it. Thought I was at Eldo for just a second there.

By Patrick Maloney
Jun 5, 2012

Sorry ddriver,
The whole point of this route was to put up something a bit more challenging than other routes on this wall. The start is no harder than 5.10a if you thought it was 5.11 you should do more thin face in big and little cottonwood! this route is as classic as ravages, just a bit more runout!
P. Maloney

By zoso
Nov 8, 2012
rating: 5.10a

Fantastic route! Thanks.

By Kevin A Lockwood
May 4, 2013
rating: 5.10-

Great route with a tenuous start. The (mental) crux is probably getting to the first bolt. After you clip the first bolt and calm down the climbing is great. 5.10- climbing leads into relaxing, fun 5.7/5.8 at the top. Could possibly add another bolt lower down and to the right of the first bolt. Nice job Pat.

By Austin Black
May 8, 2013
rating: 5.9+

Even though the first bolt was a little high, I felt it added to the rating of the climb. The first few moves felt pretty easy, followed by a 9+ move just before the bolt. I like that it wasn't any lower. It really makes you focus in. If it were any lower, the move preceding it would not have felt quite so committing. Loved the route. All the bolts after number one felt a safe distance apart.

By bap
May 26, 2013

The rating of this climb is confusing as Ravages of Time has the same rating and this climb is much more difficult not to mention much more dangerous. I would give this a rating of an 11 as mentioned above.