The Big Dipper 5.11a
| 2,387 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Sport, 1 pitch |
| Consensus: | 5.10c/d [details] |
| FA: | Chris Alber, 1998 |
| Submitted By: | Peter Franzen on Jan 1, 2001 |
| |
Big jugs, fun climbing. Picture by Ingrid Nelson.
Add Photo Printer View
Description This quality climb is a good introduction to the steep routes on the Clock Tower's imposing roof. It starts a few feet to the right of the large tree that greets you as soon as you get to the base of the wall by coming up the trail. Ignore the tree placement in Rolofson's new guidebook, as he has it too far to the right. Anyways, the route climbs well-protected 5.11 moves through a small roof before topping out on a slab. Find the handy no-hands rest after pulling the roof and chalk up well so you don't grease off the slab moves.
Protection 9 bolts to a 2 bolt anchor. Quickdraws are all you need.
James casually warming up on Big Dipper
| Fun jug haul.
| |
| Comments on The Big Dipper |
|
By Jeff Lockyer From: Canmore, AB Sep 25, 2001
| An enjoyable route, although it doesn't look very promising from the ground. The holds are large and the angle is steeper than it looks, if there was no bat shit all over the route, it would be much nicer, but a great line dispite all of this. |
By Chad Stebbins May 14, 2002
| Great route, very fun. Seemed easier than graded for those who are pushing their limits. |
By Anonymous Coward Aug 8, 2002
| A beautiful climb! The bat shit, I feel, does not detract from the route at all since it has become park of the rock --- like a black glue. A great workout for more difficult 5.11's. |
By Anonymous Coward May 7, 2004
| Easier than Tagger, Outer Space, Grandmother's Challenge, etc. |
By nick spoog Jul 20, 2004
| I've been on routes graded mid-5.10 that are harder than Tagger, Outer Space, and Grandmother's Challenge. So, that makes Tagger, Outer Space and Grandmother's Challenge 10- or perhaps 5.9, which means Big Dipper is 5.9 or 5.8 (this is clearly nonsense).......... The point: it's difficult to compare trad grades to sport grades. Furthermore, it's hard to compare grades from one climbing area with grades of another climbing area. How about we compare the grade for a climb in one are with other climbs in the SAME area. (i.e., compare Big Dipper to other climbs in Boulder Canyon). The result of within-climbing area grade comparison will of course be that some areas will have a reputation as soft and others as sandbagged.... but who cares....... |
By nick spoog Jul 21, 2004
| Yes, the old Spoog-ster does care, and anonymous coward appears to also care. This is good. The Spoog-ster cares about consistency in grading/quality ratings within a climbing area...not the actual grades themselves. We climbers should all care and make efforts to continue self-organizing ourselves for the benefit of our sport. |
By Anonymous Coward Jul 21, 2004
| I totally agree with Nick. I am so sick of hearing how "That route would be 5.6 at the Gunks."And really, who does care if it's a, b, d,q, or f. Did you enjoy the climb or not? And besides, your not 20 years old anymore and the routes are probably harder than you remember! Good luck with your crusade. |
By ac Jul 21, 2004 rating: 5.9+
| Might as well mention that most of this route could be led on good natural gear. So, it's overrated, overbolted....right on par for Bo Can. |
By Zach Allen Sep 1, 2005 rating: 5.9+
| A joke at .11a. Watch the z-clip crux. |
By Dr. Evil From: Boulder, CO Jun 23, 2007 rating: 5.10a
| This climb is fun, and consistently easier than it looks. |
By keith story From: Boulder, CO Sep 2, 2009 rating: 5.10a
| One of my favorite climbs in the Sport Park. I typically stay in the 5.9-5.10 realm, but my brother took me up on this one and I loved it more than some 4-star climbs. A great route for anyone breaking into the 5.11s. |
By keith story From: Boulder, CO Jul 11, 2010 rating: 5.10a
| Finally returned to this one and got to lead it! Whatever the grade, it's a great route. Some exciting exposed moves. Check it out if you're in the area. |
|