Slimy Slit (aka Slippery Slit) 5.10b
| 335 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | TR, 1 pitch, 55 feet |
| Consensus: | 5.10a/b [details] |
| FA: | TR: Ken Klis, 1986 |
| Submitted By: | Ryan Nevius on Oct 16, 2011 |
| |
Add Photo Printer View
Description Start right of “Camel.” Climb steep moves out right while working your way up to a left-facing seam.
Location Directly right of "Camel."
Protection Toprope from the "Camel" anchors.
| Comments on Slimy Slit (aka Slippery Slit) |
|
By Ryan Nevius From: San Luis Obispo, CA Oct 16, 2011
| Every time I top rope this after climbing Camel, I can't help but wish there were bolts to clip. In my opinion, the route quality is right up there with Camel itself. |
By Jim Reynolds Oct 31, 2011 rating: 5.10-
| I dont think this route is 10c anymore; a crucial hold broke, which coincidentally exposed a larger hold, thus making the crux not so cruxy If you finish on the same ending as Camel, the move with the softball-like grip is probably 10c tho.. |
By Tyler Alves From: South Lake Tahoe, CA Feb 10, 2012 rating: 5.10a/b
| Totally agree with Ryan. Since the FA is unknown, would it still be totally out of line to bolt it? Rivals Camel in quality, but with a unique style of movement. |
By John Knight Feb 11, 2012
| If you bolt it they will come . . . |
By Ken Klis Feb 17, 2012
| fa (toprope) I did it around 1986, named it slimy not Slippery, the hole was damp -- but that don't mean taint. I never bolted it as I thought bolt #2 would be too close to Camel, and No Permits right there also, but you kids go get what you need ehh? |
By Ryan Nevius From: San Luis Obispo, CA Feb 17, 2012
| Don't get me wrong; I wasn't suggesting that bolts would be appropriate. I was mostly commenting on the quality of the climb and that it would make a good lead (like many other top rope climbs). I think it would be inappropriate and unnecessary to bolt this climb. |
|