Planning a rock climbing vacation this winter?
|
Whenever I mention climbing in Cayman Brac most people say, "Never heard of it", so I'm trying to correct that. |
|
Is there a cheaper way to get there? Looking up tickets and its exactly ten times what I paid for my trip to puerto rico over the summer. |
|
Rob Davis wrote:Is there a cheaper way to get there? Looking up tickets and its exactly ten times what I paid for my trip to puerto rico over the summer.I don't know what you paid for PR but I just ticketed yesterday for $595 Denver-Cayman Brac in March. Spring Break and Xmas-New Years are always higher. Unless you live near an airport that has direct Saturday flights to Grand Cayman (eg. New York, Atlanta, Miami) try a travel agent. I've found that they always do better than I can find both on price and times. |
|
Looks awesome!!! |
|
any more pics of the sport climbing? |
|
5.samadhi wrote:any more pics of the sport climbing?You mean in addition to all the photos at the two links I posted? Try here: mountainproject.com/v/cayma… Burrow down to the individual route descriptions. |
|
I have images of shredded tips in my mind. Has anyone been working on filing off the edges or whatever rips fingers up down there? Are most routes actually friendly? Would love to consider this as a destination. |
|
^^^Comfortizing Holds? Maybe I'm naive, but is this really an accepted practice amongst developers? I'm familiar with the whole "creative cleaning" philosophy, employed to avoid having one 5.13 move in the middle of what could be an awesome, 100 foot 5.10 pitch etc. But filing edges to save tips? |
|
Limestone pockets are often pretty nasty without a little dulling of the edges and spikes. With traffic they would be worn down anyway, but very few will enjoy the initial process of wearing them down by hand and foot. |
|
Locker wrote:"But filing edges to save tips?" That's a new one on me as well. I have the feeling Mike isn't serious. If he is? Well, dude's a nut! To be expected. ;-)Ever climb at Wild Iris? Or anyplace in southern Europe? |
|
I have no problem comfortizing sharp limestone holds but I would never create a hold where one did not naturally exist. |
|
Ed Wright wrote:I have no problem comfortizing sharp limestone holds but I would never create a hold where one did not naturally exist.Same here, and I'll add that doing so really does not affect the route's difficulty up or down. It is a far cry from actual chipping. It can make the difference between 'fuck this place' to 'hell ya!' |
|
Mike Lane wrote: Same here, and I'll add that doing so really does not affect the route's difficulty up or down. It is a far cry from actual chipping. It can make the difference between 'fuck this place' to 'hell ya!'I disagree. Modification of routes can be a good thing I guess - I do hope the first few climbers on a route trundle some blocks that are going to eventually come down when people climb, rather than leaving those blocks there for some careless or unlucky climber to dislodge onto the delayer. However, differentiating between "chipping" and "filing" requires some pretty specific definitions. They both involve modifying hand or foot holds. They both make the route easier/more comfortable to do. They both bring a route down to the climbers level, rather than requiring the climber to rise to the rock. In instances where the rock is particularly soft, and repeated traffic will produce the same wear anyway, I guess it doesn't make much of a difference. All the same, I'd rather everyone keep their files away from the rocks I climb. |
|
Ed Wright wrote:I have no problem comfortizing sharp limestone holds but I would never create a hold where one did not naturally exist.Ed probably climbs harder and has more experience than me, but this statement seems a little nonsensical. It seems as though this statement distilled to its essence could be rephrased: "I have no problem modifying holds that are hard to hang onto to make them easier to hang onto, but I would never modify the rock in spots that are hard to hang onto to make them easier to hang onto." |
|
I think what Ed meant is |
|
rocknice2 wrote:I think what Ed meant is "I have no problem modifying holds that are painful to hang onto to make them less so, but I would never modify the rock in spots that are hard to hang onto to make them easier to hang onto."Doesn't make a difference. "I don't want to try to hang onto that rock in its current state, so I will modify it". There are a few thousand more pressing problems in the world, and a few hundred in the realm of climbing. While we're on the topic, though, I think the contradiction I've addressed is worth pointing out. Fundamentally, it is modification of the rock in order to make it easier to climb on. |
|
WDW4 wrote: Doesn't make a difference. "I don't want to try to hang onto that rock in its current state, so I will modify it". There are a few thousand more pressing problems in the world, and a few hundred in the realm of climbing. While we're on the topic, though, I think the contradiction I've addressed is worth pointing out. Fundamentally, it is modification of the rock in order to make it easier to climb on.Have you climbed on much limestone, or ever developed any new routes at limestone crags? Something tells me you haven't. |
|
Limestone varies in strength. My new routing experience was in Bermuda, the rock was sharp and featured. It really hurt. We often referred to the holds as "character building". Within a few ascents though, our shoes had done the same work a file would have done. |
|
How much potential is there for new routes? With only 70 routes (45- 90 feet tall), you might want to advertise to people that are psyched on developing new routes. |
|
Mark E Dixon wrote: Have you climbed on much limestone, or ever developed any new routes at limestone crags? Something tells me you haven't.Nope, never climbed much on limestone, though I don't think that is immediately pertinent to the discussion at hand. The main reason for that is all the limestone I've looked at near where I live (Kentucky) is so chossy I'd have to spend a few days pulling blocks off to get down to solid rock, and that doesn't jive with my idea of environmental stewardship. |
|
WDW4 wrote: Nope, never climbed much on limestone, though I don't think that is immediately pertinent to the discussion at hand. The main reason for that is all the limestone I've looked at near where I live (Kentucky) is so chossy I'd have to spend a few days pulling blocks off to get down to solid rock, and that doesn't jive with my idea of environmental stewardship.You have no idea at all what we are talking about. |