Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
old camalots vs. C4's weight



View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums


Page 1 of 1.  
 
By Darren in Vegas
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
Skiing around.

So I have a set of the old style camalots that are still in great shape, but I am considering buying a new set of C4's for the weight savings in the pack. I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find the specs for the old camalots so that I can do some quick math to see if I think that it is worth the money to buy a third set of cams.
I have tried Google, and the search function here, but I think my search skills are lacking.


FLAG
By Jake Jones
From The Eastern Flatlands
Apr 6, 2012
Me and the offspring walking back to the car after a day of cragging.

This may shed a little light on what you're looking for.

I've heard anywhere from 20% to 30% weight reduction vs the previous generation.


FLAG
By Darren in Vegas
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
Skiing around.

That is very helpful, thanks muttonface.
So here is the math from the article.
0.4-3 saves 5.1oz.
4 saves 1.2oz (vs old 4)
5 saves 2.1oz (vs old 4.5)
6 adds 0.5oz. (vs old 5)
edit 7.9oz saving so far, but there is no 3.5 which saves 10oz.
So overall 17.9 savings (over 1 lb).
Overall C4's from 0.4 - 6 weigh 71oz (4.4lbs)
Overall old set from 0.4 - 6 weigh 88.9oz (5.6lbs)

Not bad.

So I was thinking about swapping carabiners also.
10 neutrinos for racking cams at 1.3oz (36g) = 13oz.
Add 20 for 10 slings = 26oz.
So 39oz total

30 camp nanos at 0.8oz each is 24 oz.
So nanos save 15 oz (0.9lb).
2.1 pound savings total between new cams and new biners.
I'm sold.


FLAG
By Dirty Gri Gri, or is it GiGi?
From Vegas
Apr 6, 2012
Starting up Toe Jam in Joshua Tree. What a fun, mellow route with good pro! Makes me like J-Tree more. ; ) <br /> <br />[Feb. 2013]

My rack is about 8-10 years old, and OMG, what a weight difference there is compared to the newer generation gear. My rack, compared to my boyfriend's newer generation rack (with about the same amt. of gear ) seems twice as heavy. I should weigh our racks, and compare for fun.


FLAG
By John Hegyes
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
South of Windy Peak

Darren in Vegas wrote:
I am considering buying a new set of C4's for the weight savings in the pack.
I'm sure as soon as you buy a set of C4s, Black Diamond will come out with C5s and you'll probably be surprised at how much weight you could have saved if you had waited just a little longer...


FLAG
By Darren in Vegas
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
Skiing around.

John Hegyes wrote:
I'm sure as soon as you buy a set of C4s, Black Diamond will come out with C5s and you'll probably be surprised at how much weight you could have saved if you had waited just a little longer...

That same thought has crossed my mind.


FLAG
By sqwirll
From Las Vegas
Apr 6, 2012
Cool snow formation at the base.

Darren in Vegas wrote:
6.9oz saving so far


Good thing your job doesn't involve math. ;)


FLAG
By John Wilder
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
Hiking some 5.fun in Squish.

Nah, BD is coming out with micro-cams this summer, but I wouldnt expect C4s to be replaced anytime soon.


FLAG
By Brandon Gottung
From Moab, UT
Apr 6, 2012
В Екатеринбурге

This chart answers your question and has a bunch of helpful numbers:
www.clydesoles.com/Front/Camsbrand.html


FLAG
By Ben Burnett
Apr 6, 2012

John Hegyes wrote:
I'm sure as soon as you buy a set of C4s, Black Diamond will come out with C5s and you'll probably be surprised at how much weight you could have saved if you had waited just a little longer...


Oh yes, BD already has prototypes out for the new C5s - although I doubt they'll save you much weight!

I stole the original photo - claim it if it's yours!
I stole the original photo - claim it if it's yours!
Submitted By: Ben Burnett on Apr 6, 2012


FLAG
By Darren in Vegas
From Las Vegas, NV
Apr 6, 2012
Skiing around.

sqwirll wrote:
Good thing your job doesn't involve math. ;)

more like good thing my job doesn't involve typing.


FLAG
By Ray Pinpillage
Apr 6, 2012

Ben Burnett wrote:
Oh yes, BD already has prototypes out for the new C5s - although I doubt they'll save you much weight!


Weak photoshop. Try harder.


FLAG
By gary ohm
From Paso Robles
Apr 7, 2012

Sheesh are all you folk really that close to "the edge"? I mean if I have a healthy "morning constitutional" and ease up on the breakfast coffee I can hit or miss five pounds from one day to the next. I thought part of the lure of trad climbing was not worrying about weight. Where's my ham sammich and Pabst?


FLAG
By Ben Burnett
Apr 7, 2012

Ray Pinpillage wrote:
Weak photoshop. Try harder.


Ouch, don't make me call the "Guideline #1 police" :)

Ok lets see you do better!


FLAG
By Nelson Day
From Victorville, CA
Apr 16, 2012
me (about to sneeze)

Go here:

www.blackdiamondequipment.com/en-us/shop/climb/protection/ca>>>

click on the compare tab under the picture. It has the size and weight differences of all their old vs new cams.

Or just look at this picture I got from the same place.

from Black Diamond website.
from Black Diamond website.
Submitted By: Nelson Day on Apr 16, 2012


FLAG
By Ethan Henderson
From Silverdale, WA
Apr 16, 2012
aliens

stick with the old cams, it's like saying 1 pound is work a few hundred bucks.

IMHO the old camalots had better sizing, the 3.5 and 4 fit better than the new 4. But thats just my opinion.


FLAG
By Max Supertramp
Apr 16, 2012

i've heard pube-shaving is an excellent means of cutting weight.


FLAG
By Greg D
From Here
Apr 17, 2012
Out of the blue.  Photo by Mike W. <br />

Darren in Vegas wrote:
2.1 pound savings total between new cams and new biners. I'm sold.


I crap bigger than this!


FLAG
By Keenan Waeschle
From Bozeman, MT
Apr 17, 2012
on top of the RNWF <br />June 2012

Max Supertramp wrote:
i've heard pube-shaving is an excellent means of cutting weight.


for a hundred buck you could take a couple nair baths.


FLAG
By Brent Apgar
Apr 17, 2012
Me and Spearhead

Max Supertramp wrote:
i've heard pube-shaving is an excellent means of cutting weight.


It's how I roll... just saying.


FLAG
By Nelson Day
From Victorville, CA
Apr 19, 2012
me (about to sneeze)

I definitely appreciate the weight savings when climbing harder routes. A pound difference hanging off of your waist makes a noticeable difference! Especially when you are climbing multi-pitch. I like the thumb loop design better too; makes placing a bit easier when in a crunch. I bought my C4's used on the for sale forum. You can piece meal a full set together if you are patient.

My trad rack now weighs about 6.5 pounds, down from 8.5 pounds. I am using a full set of metolius master cams and 0.5 - 3 on black diamond. My weight savings was biggest in switching to Mammut Moses wire gates (from BD neutrinos) and ultralight curved nuts from Metolius (from BD nuts). If you replace 50 carabiners on your rack (consider your racking biners plus your alpine sling biners) you will save a pound of weight with the Moses carabiners over the neutrinos. The Moses biners are pricey though. Using the master cams will give you two extra cams for the same weight as a set of black diamonds. Two extra cams is a great help on longer routes. The ultralight nut set from Metolius will save you 1/3 of a pound over the black diamond nuts. I sold my black diamond nuts on the used gear forum for $45, bought the ultralight nuts on sale for $109, so it wasn't that bad out of pocket.

The noticeable difference from a lighter trad rack is where the weight is positioned. If your body weighs more, you don't notice it since it is distributed well over your whole body. Weight hanging off of your waist or a gear sling hangs in a concentrated load which is definitely noticeable. The alternative option: get stronger and don't worry about it.


FLAG
By Nelson Day
From Victorville, CA
Apr 19, 2012
me (about to sneeze)

Greg D wrote:
I crap bigger than this!


Actually, I was curious how much a crap weighed. Not much. Try it at home with a before and after body weight. Piss weighs a lot more. Probably TMI.


FLAG
By Greg D
From Here
Apr 19, 2012
Out of the blue.  Photo by Mike W. <br />

Nelson Day wrote:
Actually, I was curious how much a crap weighed. Not much. Try it at home with a before and after body weight. Piss weighs a lot more. Probably TMI.


Look turd nerd. You have no idea how big I crap. So don't stick your nose in my shit.


FLAG
By BameR
From golden, co
Apr 19, 2012
The rappel off the Maiden, Boulder, CO 9/27/11

Alright if we are measuring feces you have to use the correct measurement..... I believe its called a Courick- and it weighs about 2.5#s/ katie courick.

Source:
www.southparkstudios.com/clips/155640/crap-verification


FLAG
By Michael Roadie
May 9, 2012
Sugarite

You f@$#%&* crack me up! =}


FLAG
By Lyont72
From Foco, CO
May 9, 2012
Me

Darren

This might help . . . no need for math and it is from BD.



www.mountainproject.com/v/bd-re-sizing-/107567574


Happy sending.


FLAG

Page 1 of 1.