Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
Chipping in LCC

  [ Forums > Northern Utah & Idaho ]
View Latest Posts in this Forum     Page 3 of 3.  <Prev  1  2  3

 
By mase
Jun 29, 2009

thanks Craig. i believe that is the trail we intended but definitely missed. I think maybe we were too far east. when i find it, I'll be sure to install some overhead signs with brochure type advertisements saying "fin this way!" "a must climb" "not to be missed raves rolling stone!"


FLAG
By TP in SLC
Jun 29, 2009
The 5.9 handcrack on Center Thumb<br /><br />Photo: Eric Draper 2001

Allen Sanderson wrote:
The drilled rock signage crap needs to stop. The crags being signed are well established crags. If you are not competent enough to find them you probably should not be in the woods.


Perfectly put. In fact please sell your drill and do the community a favor.


FLAG
By mikewhite
Jun 29, 2009
  Third bolt on last pitch of cheetah

This sucks, but I think it is just the beginning of something very bad.

Who ever is doing this is not going to stop.

The last thing we want to do is involve the forest service, Unless we have a witness and can have charges filed!!!


FLAG
By Tyson Anderson
From Las Vegas, NV
Jun 29, 2009

What if the climbing community were to come up with some kind of "drilling manifesto" that could be distributed with any drills and drill bits that are sold. You would have to get some kind of deal with either the drill makers or the bigger sellers like rei and mountain gear. I'm sure the smaller dedicated climbing shops would easily adopt the plan.

As for electric and gas drills I don't think this would help at all seeing that they probably come from home depot or other hardware store.

I'm not really a driller and can't really guess if these perps are using hand drills or electric/gas but it seems like some kind of education might help remedy the problem. Then again, some people are just idiots and would still do whatever they wanted.


FLAG
By springs
Jun 29, 2009

S. Gileadi wrote:
The problem will stop as soon as the person stops. I don't see this as an inevitable consequence of more traffic in these areas. No, I think that most people are perfectly capable of using their heads even if there are more of them. If one moron starts chiseling the rock, as is obviously the case here, there is no need for all of us to throw our hands up in defeat and start posting signs in Little. All that needs to happen is communication- this person simply needs to know that he is bucking the will of the community and endangering access and I think he would be smart enough to know to stop. In any case I don't see how the stupidity of the very few people who would need signposts, still only a potential handful as traffic increases, should make us start dumbing down and creating eyesores in the area. Plus, you know there would always be the special somebody who would go out of his way to take them all down anyway.


Well, if we are realistic about some of the "trails", I would hardly say some of them are obvious. Even a brainiac can get lost on the approach to the Thumb and some other areas less visited. Recognizing that someone/s are taking steps to better mark things is a sign of increased use, and an indication that volume and traffic has increased in the area.

Unfortunately, it is no longer the "old days" where there are only a handful of climbers using the walls in LCC. While it might be nice to reminisce and say that we don't need well marked trails, or that it doesn't really matter, you might simply be overstating things to say that this really isn't necessary. Maybe some better trails and clearing more foilage would be enough to make a need for signposts disappear. Who knows. Apparently signs are a waste since it sounds like most people in this group would simply destroy them. I personally think that in places that I've climbed where signs are used (smith rock, for instance), trails get much better established.

I was simply suggesting a solution that I thought might help, but it seems like most people would rather not recognize that volume has increased and would rather live in the past where all/many climbers shared the same ethics and you didn't have to deal with an increase in the popularity of a sport that has much evolved since when it first began.

Anyhow, I've shared my thoughts, good luck with whatever decision you guys decide to use to tackle this problem.


FLAG
By Tyson Anderson
From Las Vegas, NV
Jun 29, 2009

springs wrote:
Apparently signs are a waste since it sounds like most people in this group would simply destroy them.


I don't think it is the signs that piss people off, it's the fact that they are "drilled" signs that are way too permanent. If it is really an area of high use and everybody is having trouble finding it a sign would be much better compared to a gazillion different trails.

However, I think old fashioned cairns and decent beta from a guidebook will suffice. Route-finding is a required skill when climbing outside of a gym.


FLAG
By Ben Folsom
From Sandy, Utah
Jun 29, 2009
Rosco, A fine animal.

The local guidebooks are MORE than enough to get people to where they want to go. Above all that there is the internet where you can find step by step instructions on getting just about anywhere. There is always trail work that can be done, to minimize erosion, make sure areas aren't getting trampled all over. For the fuurther and less visited areas, a good healthy scrub oak thrashing, even if it takes up a good part of the day, is something that every Wasatch climber should have to do every once in a while.
The chipped signs are ridiculous and wooden signs are probably not an option in LCC. The trails are way better now, for the most part, than they were 15 years ago. I don't recall having too many problems finding the climbing ever. Like previously stated, a little common sense is about all that is needed. And if you find yourself in the brush for hours and hours, just count it as another day in Little Rottonwood.


FLAG
By Dave Budge
From Wasangeles
Jun 30, 2009

Ben's right. Part of climbing is getting to know areas and occasionally getting lost during that process. Exploring and discovering something new only happens once, climbers should try and enjoy it.


FLAG
By mobley
From Haven, Ct
Jun 30, 2009

this sounds like someone who is REALLY high doing this or quite possibly a boy scout project. maybe both.

at least they arent painting every other tree and rock on the trail with arrows and such like in the east.


FLAG
By ddriver
Jun 30, 2009

Its already been stated here, but I'll say it again.

There won't be any signs on church property, pretty much end of story. Church lawyers are under the illusion that they will have increased liability for an accident if they take any action to "enable" climbing. So, forget about signage for the Fin, Thumb, Gate, etc. I won't even discuss the trails themselves here on a public forum.

As for USFS property, the new trail to the Egg etc is nowhere to be found in existing guidebooks, obviously, but the location of the climbs themselves certainly is. Most any rock retard ought to be able to find their way up there. I don't have a problem with wooden posts or such that keep people on the right trail, but this crap isn't rocket science. Hopefully the idiot doing this stuff will catch on and stop, or someone else will clue him in.


FLAG
By jonathan knight
Jun 30, 2009
Kessler Cairn

I have a feeling that we are dealing with someone in desperate need of attention, so I think we are just feeding the troll here.

To sum it up, we have talked about putting some signs in to mark the new trail, but this is obviously not necessary. In the future there could be a bulletin board with a map and any important notices at the park and ride trail head. Some "restoration area" signs need to be installed in a few areas. Hopefully they won't be ripped out.

Enjoy the remaining "wildness" of LCC. As the trail system continues to gradually improve there will be signs, more climbers, and more use by the general public.


FLAG
By STH
Jun 30, 2009

jonathan knight wrote:
I have a feeling that we are dealing with someone in desperate need of attention, so I think we are just feeding the troll here.



DING! DING! DING! I think we have a winner!


FLAG
By Brian in SLC
From Salt Lake City, UT
Jun 30, 2009
Climbing in Smuggler's Notch

jonathan knight wrote:
I have a feeling that we are dealing with someone in desperate need of attention, so I think we are just feeding the troll here.


Yeah, smells that way to me, too.

Whoever is doing it (or, past tense, has done it), knows the area and isn't a newb. They also are handy with a power drill. They also made time to do this. This isn't something you just bang out in a few minutes (ala a can of spray paint). Required a bit of planning, some materials, etc. And, given what it was, it was well done, so, someone took a fair bit of care in the construction.

What I'm hoping, is, that whoever is doing this, is done. If they’ve stood back recently to admire their work, then, they know it wasn’t well received and was eliminated.

Allen, where did you see the signage? Was it new (ie, fresh rock dust)?

jonathan knight wrote:
To sum it up, we have talked about putting some signs in to mark the new trail, but this is obviously not necessary. In the future there could be a bulletin board with a map and any important notices at the park and ride trail head. Some "restoration area" signs need to be installed in a few areas. Hopefully they won't be ripped out.


Given all the different "users" in the canyon, my bet is any sign will either get trashed and/or tagged. Be a pain to have to keep fixing. Heavy sigh...

This is the kind of situation I’m hoping the climbing community can police, and, not burden or involve "LE" type folks at any level.

-Brian in SLC


FLAG
By Price
From Sandy, UT
Jun 30, 2009

Brian in SLC wrote:
"users"



users .. ha!


FLAG

  [ Forums > Northern Utah & Idaho ]
Page 3 of 3.  <Prev  1  2  3