No Name Crack 5.10
| 3,921 page views
Good page?   |
BETA PHOTO
Add Photo  Printer View
Description I missed the on-sight on my first attempt, but got the red point the next day. There are two wide sections that a wasted to much this in. All though both of then short I got worked. I key to completing this route for me was to move fast, and place a little less gear. The pro is great and a fall clean.
Protection A lot of #2 and #3 Camalot, two #4s, and 1 #1 Camalot at the top as a last placement. I loved this route.
Tony Bubb follows No Name crack, ~2001. Photo by J...
|
The cruxes are 1/3 and 2/3 up the route at wide sp...
|
Greg K at the base of No Name Crack
| | | |
| Comments on No Name Crack |
|
By Ben F
From: Benfield, Kolorado
Nov 25, 2001
| This route is to the left of 3 am crack and also starts on a small pillar in a right-facing dihedral. It can be distinguished from 3 am by being a bit wider and lacking a roof. Another beauty of a climb. |
By Charles Vernon
From: Florence, AZ
Apr 15, 2002
| I liked this route even better than Incredible Hand Crack or 3AM Crack. Look for the no hands rest (which I missed) halfway up. It can be done with a 60 meter rope, barely, but be very careful--one or two downclimbing moves might be necessary. The smaller pillar at the start is loose, so pull gingerly! |
By Anonymous Coward
Oct 21, 2005
| i've heard not just a few people refer to this as the "4am crack" - its similar but slightly bigger than 3am, right facing corner, etc. - mayber better than yet another nameless crack at the creek - |
By Jason Hundhausen
From: Bozeman, MT
Jul 17, 2007
rating: 5.10
| This was one of my favorite climbs of our trip. I have big hands, so it was more of an "incredible hand crack" for me than was the real "Incredible Hand Crack." |
By caughtinside
From: Oakland CA
Nov 6, 2008
| Indistinguishable from 3am crack. They're the same!! |
|
RSS Feed
1 more...
Slideshow
