|1,695 page views|
This is the huge gully on the east face of Laurel Mountain, easily visible from the hot tubs down in Long Valley. The route starts at the Convict Lake parking area. Take the lake trail around the north side of the lake. At the far end of the lake there is a junction, stay straight (right) as the lake trail drops down to the left. After half a mile or so, the trail crosses an old creekbed. You can see it leading up to the gully above to your right. Follow the creekbed to the gully, and proceed up the gully. Depending on season the bottom of the gully may or may not be full of snow. I had to bypass the snow and ice by climbing choss on the gully's right side. Eventually, I was able to come down to the bottom of the gully again. The rock in the bottom of the gully is quite good, blue limestone, very unusual for the sierras. The climbing comes in steps... 20 feet of steep (though always easy) rock, then flat for a while, then another rock step. After a while, the gully steepens but stays easy. It winds to the left and then back to the right again, shooting straight for the summit to the right of a very steep buttress. Eventually the gully opens out onto the scree slopes that lead to the summit proper. Whew! Descebd to the north, then down snow and scree slopes to the east, eventually picking up a faint trail through the brush that leads south back down to Convict Lake. Now buy yourself a beer and go soak in the hot tubs!
None needed. You could bring a rope but there's no pro anyway.
Georgeous view from Convict Lake.
Scrambling up Laurel Mountain. Photo by Dale Apga...
BETA PHOTO: Up the technical crux, may 2 low 5th moves, but pa...
The gray limestone has the best friction.
BETA PHOTO: From the bottom head up this first chute (deep and...
|Comments on Mendenhall Couloir
|By Preston Rhea|
From: Mammoth Lakes
Mar 20, 2013
rating: 4th 1 2 I M 1b
This is also a great climb to be done in winter. It consists of almost all snow climbing with a couple sections of exposed rock and thin ice depending on the snowfall that year. I found it to be easily solo-able at 4th class moderate snow. A trip report (not by me) can be found here.
|By tom donnelly|
Aug 12, 2013
rating: 4th 1 2 I M 1b
Best done with no rope.
The summer descent circles around the first bowl on the NE side.
If you go direct down the first bowl at 10700 it's nasty & loose in summer.
Circle around until approx 9800 feet before going down into bowl & brush.
Aug 14, 2013
rating: 5.4 4a 12 IV VD 3c R
Joined three very experienced Bishop climbers to do it today (with no rope). Some of us were thinking this is about the longest stretch of reasonably good easy rock in the Sierra.
At least two of us felt there was at least one 5.4 move. Most of the hard moves are near the bottom, but then there's one more like 3/4 the way up. The most recent guidebook rates this route 5.2
The harder moves mostly have slabby feet, so I recommend wearing shoes with sticky climbing rubber. I did it in my approach shoes with climbing rubber, but I sort of wished I'd had my climbing shoes for a little more precision on small slopy spots on the upper crux.
I thought the rock was generally good, except rather loose scrambling on the reddish rock near the top, and in a few short sections along the way. Also I found near the bottom when I went outside the narrow gully, then things were pretty breakable. Also lots of other places with little heaps of rocks on ledges, easily avoided by careful climbers. On the other hand, on this route I would not climb anywhere under another party whose competence and carefulness I did not know.
Rope? I think that some people capable of climbing this route (mostly 3rd class) would want the protection of a rope belay for some sections. But the leader better be someone comfortable soloing it.
Descent: Lots of people think descending toward the North, then down East is pretty steep and un-fun; and very experienced climbers and guidebook writers recommend other descents. But we did the N then E descent, so I can't comment on the other options. I mostly liked the N then E option: because I'm good at "skiing" down steep scree, and I brought my light hiking poles to help me keep my balance while "skiing" it - (gaiters also recommended). The instructions in the SuperTopo guidebook were very helpful. Near the bottom I found a short section of 4th class down-climbing on rock. And there was a section of moderate bushwhacking at the bottom, but I got through it just fine without wearing long pants. Climbers who are not sure they have knees and ankles of steel should investigate the other descent options (one source I know is the SuperTopo guidebook).
name? I think "Mendenhall couloir" is more the skier's name for this route. In the two climbing guidebooks I own it's called the "NorthEast gully". It's not really a couloir except in the bottom section, and it shares that section with another (easier) route called the "NorthEast trough" (which one guidebook says is fairly good).
Aug 14, 2013
rating: 5.4 4a 12 IV VD 3c R
To my surprise yesterday on Laurel Mt, the tracks I had put onto my GPS turned out to be rather useful (and accurate) for doing both the climb and the descent.
The tracks I followed are linked from this page .
Some detailed directions for my descent as I remember it ...
. (these are for the steepest most difficult "N then E" option) .
From the summit of Laurel Mt, follow a vague track roughly N about 500 meters distance down to around altitude 3390 meters. Then trend NE for about 600m down to around altitude 3150m, passing by the lowest last mini-peak of the rocky NNE ridge of Laurel Mt. To be careful, it makes sense to get up on top of that point and have a look around. Facing down toward the SW end of Convict Lake, see a scary-looking gully on your right, a wide bowl to your left, and a steep scree gully straight below aimed roughly at the end of the lake.
I think the theory here is that the scary-looking gully is a really bad idea, and that the wide bowl looks inviting and is likely less steep, but it has lots more bushes, while the straight-down gully has mostly scree/dirt/gravel instead of bushes. Myself, I can get down steep scree (by sort of "skiing" it) faster and easier than lots of bushes, so I chose the straight center option.
That gully started down E (later curved SE). At first that went well, but much lower down the gully narrowed and it was mostly a choice of rocks (or bushes) instead of scree/dirt/gravel. For about 20ft I encountered a pure rock slope, felt to me like I needed to do some Class 4 moves. Then close to the bottom I felt forced into the bushes, which slowed me down. But I think much less of that than if I'd taken the wide bowl. Then I hit the main hiking trail.