By SAL From broomdigiddy Mar 30, 2009
| wow. That is very strange. I have heard of rapping directly off a v thread cord or somthing to that effect but never for a top rope. I am surprised to read that 2 climbers safley made it up and down before that burned through. Glad to see he survived and can hold his little boy and wife still. Cheers to a quick recovery. |  FLAG |
By matthewWallace From plymouth, nh Mar 30, 2009
| yes that seems to be what happened a terrible oversight but i am glad he will be ok. lets all learn from this |  FLAG |
By matthewWallace From plymouth, nh Mar 30, 2009
| SAL wrote: Cheers to a quick recovery. i will drink to that |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson Mar 30, 2009
| yep, sal, on a thread you are just bailing off the route by rappel; minimal use & without the weight of the climber when you make the pull, though you still get friction -- anytime you have moving nylon over stationary, you'll get that. The rap bail biner up there was to keep the rigging intact because the route gets so much traffic -- it's not really a good top-rope setup either due to the potential for cyclical loads and then flopping a bight off, which is why the opposite opposed biners are key. |  FLAG |
By John Keller Mar 30, 2009
| I'm really glad to hear that he managed to survive this fall and, by the account in the paper, will recover. I don't intend any disrespect or judgement here but want to bring up a question. Does anyone have a thought about why this particular mistake keeps happening? It's a really really basic rope management concept that you never have moving nylon to nylon contact. It's a fundamental of our chosen activity like having your partner check that you doubled back your harness. I can understand when this happens to a novice who perhaps hasn't had the proper training or mentoring (this sort of lack of proper background happens a lot with folks coming out of the gym, for example). But by all accounts this group was pretty experienced? As a community are we somehow missing the communication of basic safety concepts? Again, I'm not judging here. We all make mistakes... it's something that we can't totally avoid. But is there something we are missing that is causing this particular mistake to happen over and over again? |  FLAG |
By KathyS From Poughkeepsie, NY Mar 30, 2009
| How do you climb for 10 years and not know TR'ing off nylon is a bad idea? I'm glad the guy is expected to recover. That's a lot of broken vertebra.... Kathy |  FLAG |
By Brad Brandewie Mar 30, 2009
| That was my thought as well Kathy.. Here's to a speedy recovery!!! |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson Mar 30, 2009
| One thing to note, that since running rope over webbing does happen as well as tr-ing off of the flimsy rap rings, to check the condition of any existing anchor material before trusting lives to them -- give yourself a redundant back-up for anything like this in question; even if you just want to rap off a station. I normally have no idea what someone has done to webbing, slings, rap rings, etc. prior to me; not to mention the weather/sun elements. My bro is lucky, I'm usually the test dummy being the bigger dude. |  FLAG |
By KathyS From Poughkeepsie, NY Mar 30, 2009
| Mark Nelson wrote: One thing to note, that since running rope over webbing does happen as well as tr-ing off of the flimsy rap rings, to check the condition of any existing anchor material before trusting lives to them -- give yourself a redundant back-up for anything like this in question; even if you just want to rap off a station. I normally have no idea what someone has done to webbing, slings, rap rings, etc. prior to me; not to mention the weather/sun elements. I usually carry a piece of "donor" nylon with me, along with a couple rap rings or a booty biner. Friends don't let friends rap off junk. Kathy |  FLAG |
By Mike Larson From New York, NY Mar 30, 2009
| KathyS wrote: How do you climb for 10 years and not know TR'ing off nylon is a bad idea? I'm glad the guy is on the road to recovery but there's got to be something we're missing here. Even the most basic gumbies know not to TR off nylon. The simple fact that he would have had to untie and then run the rope through the nylon before he could be lowered, you would think would have jolted him back into reality. I could be dead drunk and still remember such a basic rule. I'm not saying this to lay into the guy. I am saying that for a climber of 10 yrs exp there has to be something else going on here. Perhaps that he had rapped through the nylon (rather than being lowered) and then just forgot once he got to bottom that he hadn't run his rope through the biners? |  FLAG |
By Mark Cushman From Cumming, GA Mar 30, 2009
| Mike Larson wrote: I'm glad the guy is on the road to recovery but there's got to be something we're missing here Another possibility is that he threaded the rap ring AND the webbing, causing the rope to really run over the webbing and through the ring instead of just through the ring. Of course we don't know and are just guessing based on a newspaper article with no first-hand account. Hope he recovers quickly - 72 feet is a long way to fall. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson Mar 30, 2009
| I think the article was a first-hand account, Mark. |  FLAG |
By J C Wilks From Loveland, CO Mar 30, 2009
| "It was a major oversight on my part in that friction caused when rappelling off the top rope is going to burn through those anchors," Boratenski said. I think he meant being lowered off. I am still shaking my head in disbelief, how anyone that experienced could make that kind of mistake is beyond me. It's possible that he had been guided all these years without having gone though comprehensive instruction and mentoring. Everyone, please back up your anchors and double check, always. We're all hoping you have a complete recovery soon, Chris!! |  FLAG |
By Joe Santambrogio Mar 30, 2009
| Glad he is going to be ok, recovering from big falls is a lucky inconvenience. I think that we ought to remember that Lynn Hill must have been climbing for a long while before she forgot to retrace her knot resulting in a 70 footer. I know of lots of others that have made mistakes and decked/ almost, or caught them at the last minute. "We" as humans all make mistakes, some dumb, and some based on misjudgment or bad perceptions or missed information. "We" as a community should discuss, and learn from them, then when "we" are out with friends, clients, etc, be as diligent as possible to make sure one of those mistakes don't happen. "We" should also understand that the paper may or may not do a good job translating, or explaining things that may or may not have happened. Rappelling is not the same as lowering off, though are used incorrectly but interchangeably at times. |  FLAG |
By AJS From Boulder, CO Mar 30, 2009
| Tonight at REI (7:00 i think) and tomorrow at Prana (?) in Boulder is a top rope anchors 'clinic' - maybe a good idea for a refresher, especially at the beginning of the season! |  FLAG |
By Shane Neal From Colorado Springs, CO. Mar 30, 2009
| Joe Santambrogio wrote: I think that we ought to remember that Lynn Hill must have been climbing for a long while before she forgot to retrace her knot resulting in a 70 footer. "We" as humans all make mistakes, "We" as a community should discuss, and learn from them.... Agree and concur- well put. Mistakes- we all have, can and will make them. Least we not judge. Kudos to him for being so honest and accountable. One word really.... Complacency- it can be a killer. Dont let it happen to you. May we learn and be refreshed from this unfortunate and avoidable accident. Best wishes to Chris and his family, heal well and get back soon!! |  FLAG |
By J C Wilks From Loveland, CO Mar 30, 2009
| Joe Santambrogio wrote: I think that we ought to remember that Lynn Hill must have been climbing for a long while before she forgot to retrace her knot resulting in a 70 footer. That's a really good point and I am not taking a shot at guiding at all. I don't know about this case, but people do sometimes rely on guides to make up for gaps in their knowledge hoping to pick it up as they go, when they really should be taking a class or inflate their claims because they want to get on routes beyond their ability. Forgetting to tie back in when distracted at a sport anchor is an easy but deadly oversight. It could happen to anyone. It just seems to me that it should always take a bit more of a conscious effort to check the condition of fixed slings, rap rings, quick links, bail 'biner, whatever is there and make the decision whether or not to back it up. So I'm wondering how much experience he had setting up his own anchors and if he knew how much of an oversight it is to use only slings for a TR. I would think that a guide would be less likely than ordinary climbers to get sloppy with safely. It seemed like it might have been -
Joe Santambrogio wrote: missed information. -that had been covered for a long time. |  FLAG |
By timt From Wheat Ridge, CO Mar 30, 2009
| i am glad all 3 climbers are ok and that chris will make a full recovery. given that he made the mistake of setting the top rope accidentally through the nylon when he meant to go through the rings/quick links.....we should remember that those (and most) fixed anchors are meant to rappel from, NOT top rope through. Please save fixed rings for rapping AFTER top-roping thru your own gear. this saves much wear and tear on heavily used rap anchors. |  FLAG |
By Kevin Craig Mar 31, 2009
| Joe Santambrogio wrote: I think that we ought to remember that Lynn Hill must have been climbing for a long while before she forgot to retrace her knot resulting in a 70 footer.
J. C. Wilks wrote: That's a really good point... Actually, no, it's not. In one case, someone simply forgot to complete construction of an inherently safe system (the tie-in knot). In the case under discussion, someone INTENTIONALLY AND ACTIVELY CREATED an inherently UN-safe system. Two VERY different kinds of errors. That said: 1) I'm very sorry to hear about this accident 2) I'm very glad that Chris survived 3) I hope that Chris makes a rapid and complete recovery |  FLAG |
By Shane Neal From Colorado Springs, CO. Mar 31, 2009
| Kevin Craig wrote: Actually, no, it's not. In one case, someone simply forgot to complete construction of an inherently safe system (the tie-in knot). In the case under discussion, someone INTENTIONALLY AND ACTIVELY CREATED an inherently UN-safe system. Two VERY different kinds of errors. That said: 1) I'm very sorry to hear about this accident 2) I'm very glad that Chris survived 3) I hope that Chris makes a rapid and complete recovery I disagree Kevin- his act may have been intentional, however, his intetion wasnt to be unsafe. His complaceny, put in your words, allowed him to simply forget to construct an inherently safe system properly. They are the same. Both complacent errors, involving regular safety steps that were oversighted, that led to an accident, that could have been avoided. Twisting words does no justice and they are both reminders to us all. May we all learn. I concur w/the 1-3. Good luck Chris, heal well. |  FLAG |
By Kevin Craig Mar 31, 2009
| Wrong. We can't guess intent; we can only analyze the system. One if completed Is safe. The other if completed is not. One is an error of inattention;the other is an error of design. |  FLAG |
By J C Wilks From Loveland, CO Mar 31, 2009
| Kevin Craig wrote: In the case under discussion, someone INTENTIONALLY AND ACTIVELY CREATED an inherently UN-safe system. I agree, he actively created the system and that's kind of the difference I was pointing out. Where did he get the idea that it was ever acceptable? From the article: "something he now knows". Intentionally? That implies something else all together. I don't think the potential consequences to him or to anyone else were what he intended to create. After all he sent two people up after him. Btw now that I think about it, maybe they were done with the route and he was rappelling when the slings snapped after being burned by the weight of the others. It was a mistake. That's what I got from what Joe was saying, that no one is perfect and to:
Joe Santambrogio wrote: "be as diligent as possible to make sure one of those mistakes don't happen." One's an error in procedure and the other is an error in knowledge. Yes they are very different kinds of errors but mistakes none the less. |  FLAG |
By CJC Mar 31, 2009
| i find it curious that one or both of his partners might have/probably did make it to the anchor and didn't recognize the ticking time bomb that was up there. its hard to believe 3 (allegedly) competent climbers all had their eyes on this 'anchor' and lowered off anyway. i always scrutinize an anchor before i lower/rap off...no matter who built it. if either partner had done that and remedied the situation this cratering would not have occurred. not to blame them in any way, just to point out that its something we should all try to do just in case someone missed something important. |  FLAG |
By PRRose From Boulder Mar 31, 2009
| clackmon wrote: i find it curious that one or both of his partners might have/probably did make it to the anchor and didn't recognize the ticking time bomb that was up there. its hard to believe 3 (allegedly) competent climbers all had their eyes on this 'anchor' and lowered off anyway. i always scrutinize an anchor before i lower/rap off...no matter who built it. if either partner had done that and remedied the situation this cratering would not have occurred. not to blame them in any way, just to point out that its something we should all try to do just in case someone missed something important. Read the supertopo thread, which includes posts from the two followers. Apparently, they didn't climb all the way to the anchor. |  FLAG |
By CJC Mar 31, 2009
| PRRose wrote: Read the supertopo thread, which includes posts from the two followers. Apparently, they didn't climb all the way to the anchor. then i guess they didn't send the thing, did they? |  FLAG |
|