Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
Mt. Shasta
MSR Flex 4 Pot Set

$129.99 35% off

$83.35

at AlsSports

23    more...
Levitator Pack

$58.95 25% off

$44.21

at CampSaver

2    more...
Black Diamond EXL Backpack - 1220cu in

$99.95 29% off

$69.97

at Backcountry

12    more...
Petzl Hammer for QuarkNomicErgo

$49.95 25% off

$37.46

at Backcountry

   more...
Callaway Forged Golf Wedge 60 Degrees

$149.99 26% off

$109.99

at AlsSports

2    more...
Kelty Gunnison 2.2 Tent - 2 Person

$199.99 25% off

$149.99

at AlsSports

   more...
Evolv Geshido Climbing Shoe

$134.95 25% off

$101.21

at Backcountry

70    more...
 more Dirtbag Deals
Select Route:
Avalanche Gulch 
Casaval Ridge 
Green Butte Ridge 
Hotlum-Bolam Ridge 

Hotlum-Bolam Ridge 

WI2-3

   
1,432 page views
Good page?   

Type: Ice, Alpine, 6000 feet, Grade IV
Consensus: WI5+ [details]
FA: Unknown
Submitted By: Benjamin Chapman on May 7, 2011

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (5)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]

Mt. Shasta from the north.
photo: Mconnell


Add Photo  Add Comment    Printer View

Description 

From Northgate Park follow the trail south to the base of the ridge. Continue up the ridge, easier in early season, to the top of the ridge at 12,000ft. Follow the path of least resistance, typically to the climber's right (west) to the plateau and work back left (east) to the summit. Take note of the large crevasse that forms on the Hotlum Glacier. Work well to the west of it on the descent.


Location 

North face of Mt. Shasta from Northgate Park Trailhead.


Protection 

Solo. Some parties may utilize a rope in early season.



Photos of Hotlum-Bolam Ridge Slideshow Add Photo
Mt.Shasta from the north. <br />Photo: Sam Mills, 2003

Mt.Shasta from the north.
Photo: Sam Mills, 2003



Comments on Hotlum-Bolam Ridge Add Comment
Show which comments
By AJ Paul
Mar 1, 2013

I'm wondering why it says consensus is WI5+ for this route?? It looks like it should be WI 2-3. I haven't done it, but it seems a bit counter intuitive to say WI 5+ and then suggest "no protection, solo" for protection. A little confused, Andy

By Xam
May 9, 2013

I think it is problem with the algorithm...it looks like it goes in order of increasing difficulty (by the website, obviously not correct) WI1, WI2, ... , WI5, AI1, AI2, ... , AI5. So the average ('consensus') of some WI1-2 and some AI1-2 is WI5+. Obviously a goof but should be simple to correct.