Fleece jacket advice
|
I'm looking for a piece of apparel that I can use as outerwear for hiking and climbing in the fall and as a midlayer beneath a softshell or the like during cold winter months. I was initially thinking that a midweight fleece would do the job, but am wondering if synthetic insulated jackets or sweaters like this one have replaced them? Which would you recommend is better suited for my needs? |
|
Nano puff would be more packable, water and wind resistant and versatile. Fleece would be less expensive, more durable and more socially acceptable to wear indoors unless you are at some climbers/skiers hut in the mountains. There are more wind-resistant fleece pieces like Patagonia R4(??), but they can get so damn hot with even slightest movement. |
|
Sorry, but I'm getting some mixed messages. On the one hand, you say that it would be more packable, waterproof, etc, but then go on to say that it would be overkill. Is that to say you recommend fleece? |
|
scienceguy288 wrote:Sorry, but I'm getting some mixed messages. On the one hand, you say that it would be more packable, waterproof, etc, but then go on to say that it would be overkill. Is that to say you recommend fleece? What about something like the Marmot Variant (rather than the Nanopuff)? Thanks.I think what he's saying is that there are pros/cons to each choice (obviously, since if one was clearly better, why would people keep buying the other?). If you need the packability, water and wind resistance, and versatility of the nano puff, get it, but if all you need it for is car camping and single-pitch cragging, it's overkill. Which sort of leaves it at "you probably know how best you'll use it, so given the tradeoffs, which makes more sense in your situation?" |
|
Get the nanopuff. It's like the best layer ever created. I used it all the time |
|
Light insulated jackets/hoodies have pretty much replaced fleece in my outdoor wardrobe. Insulated is generally lighter, more weather resistant, less bulky. |
|
Kai Larson wrote:Light insulated jackets/hoodies have pretty much replaced fleece in my outdoor wardrobe. Insulated is generally lighter, more weather resistant, less bulky.Ditto that. Easier to wear under a shell (slippery fabric slides against the shell. I have a old, mesh-lined GoreTex parka that absolutely refuses to admit a fleece), more wind protection, and overall nicer feeling IMO. |
|
Excellent. My one remaining concern is durability (like if I stick my hand in a crack). |
|
So I'll throw a wrench in the gears... |
|
for puffies another side of the durability is "daily use" |
|
+1 to the durability. I have an 8 year old R2 fleece that was worn daily, pretty much from Nov - March in the PNW and it's still going pretty strong. |
|
The only time I wear fleeces is to the bar or to work. In the outdoor world it honestly the worst piece you can have IMO. |
|
scienceguy288 wrote:Sorry, but I'm getting some mixed messages. On the one hand, you say that it would be more packable, waterproof, etc, but then go on to say that it would be overkill. Is that to say you recommend fleece? What about something like the Marmot Variant (rather than the Nanopuff)? Thanks.What Andrew L said, except for I'm not he. Expensive technical pieces are designed to be light, compact and perform well in the mountains for a few hours to several days here and there, but usually don't hold up well the abuse of day to day wear at crags and car camping (think campfires, cooking oil, rubbing against your climbing hardware in the pack). Which is fine if a) money is not an issue, b) you only climb on weekends here and there and c) you want to look good. Fleece is cheap and practically indestructible. People usually just get sick of their fleece jackets and that is why they end up in thrift stores. I have both. I have a Nano Puff, which I use mostly for long routes, but the fabric abraded first time I took it to the Black. That is why when I go cragging I just bring my $7 fleece jacket (happens to be Patagonia ha!) I got at a thrift shop. |
|
I am really looking for a midlayer that can be used as an outer layer on cool shoulder season days or as a midlayer beneath something heavier during winter months. I already have a Northwall softshell and puffy (down) which are pretty heavy. I also have lighter base layers and some light fleece layers. However the light fleece are too light for cooler weather, but the down puffy is too heavy duty for most fall days. I am looking for something between the two that I can wear while climbing. It's now sounding like mid-weight fleece or a light softshell are more along the lines of what I'm looking for, yes? |
|
What kind of climbing? If alpine and long routes, either Nano puff pullover or something like an R1 fleece. You can also check out Marmot Driclime - they're inexpensive to begin with and you can usually find one on sale. |
|
Multipitch trad in the Adirondacks in the fall and hiking in the Adirondack High Peaks... |
|
scienceguy288 wrote:Multipitch trad in the Adirondacks in the fall and hiking in the Adirondack High Peaks...Get the Nano Puff. Some will argue for Nano Air, but I think that jacket is more suited for higher alpine in drier conditions than ADK. Nano Puff is nice because it keeps you dry in a drizzle. This is a great time of the year to do the Great Range traverse! |
|
I'm a big fan of the Atom LT. The Nano Puff looks like it was tailored for a pear. |
|
scienceguy288 wrote:Multipitch trad in the Adirondacks in the fall and hiking in the Adirondack High Peaks...So I'd seriously consider some sort of "combo" setup and avoid going with a single puff piece. My main reason for this is that, IMO, primaloft puffs simply don't have the durability and breathability that you'll want for your uses. The puffs don't move the air fast enough to keep you dry from sweat. They're more for cooler, less-movement situations like camp or a belay stance. Some garments like the Atom LT and BD Access hybrid LT attempt to address this with breathable side panels but I think you need colder conditions and wind for them to be efficient. I'd get a mid-weight fleece layer (Piton Hybrid or R1 would be my first picks) This will serve you well when moving, climbing etc. If you think you'll want more warmth, an R2 or equivalent would work too. The Alternative to that would be a Marmot DriClime jacket or equivalent. They're a bit less bulk and cut the wind better. These will both breath and layer under your outer shell (that I think you said you owned already). A good windshell (Houdini) or lightweight soft-shell (BD Alpine Start Hoody) will layer really well and provide lots of options for wear. Then, if you want more warmth at belays or camp, use a lightweight Nano Puff etc. They're a bit boxy in fit because they're intended to go over your main layer. Good reads here on the plus minus of each setup with good technical specs. Thread 1 Thread 2 Lastly, consider costs. The latest greatest Puffs etc can be hard to find sub $100. Fleece, DriClime etc are often found around $50. BD Alpine Start Hoody is $90 on sale right now. Good combo at half the Nano Air or similar to a Puffy |
|
I'm thinking that perhaps something of a system might be ideal: a R2 type fleece for when I'm actually climbing and then a synthetic insulated vest to throw on top of that for the belay station. I am having some difficulty finding a 2-way zipper on a vest at my price point, so I am thinking a button one should do just as well (just unbutton the bottom button for instant "belay vest"). Thoughts? |
|
I tried on Mountain Hardwear's Thermostatic Hooded Jacket in EMS in Lake Placid over the weekend. It's got the same amount of insulation as the Nano Puffs (60g) and it's stuffed with Mountain Hardwear's proprietor insulation, Thermal.Q Elite. |