Flakes of Wrath 5.9+
| 13,347 page views Good page? (1 like)  |
| Type: | Trad, TR |
| Consensus: | 5.9+ [details] |
| FA: | Alison Sheets, 1988 |
| Submitted By: | George Bell on Feb 26, 2002 |
| |
Adam Perks, placing gear under the roof on The Fla...
Add Photo Printer View
Description Fun trad route up an obvious left leaning, left facing corner. After leading you can TR the difficult direct variation to the left. One of the best routes here, maybe 4 stars?
Protection Friends to #3.5 with maybe an extra #2 and #2.5, medium to large stoppers.
Mike O'Sullivan
| Lorin leading Flakes of Wrath--nice one, brother--...
| Me having a blast on this fun route.
| BETA PHOTO: Route from across road
| Avery Later jamming on Flakes of Wrath
| The gear is a little tricky in this section, since...
| Adam Perks working through a crux on The Flakes of...
| Adam Perks approaching the end of the opening hand...
| Elaine digs a good jam!
| Underclinging out to the finish.
| Atop a new fav crack in Moab. Zipped up.
| Lisa Gillest ripping it up on a HOT day at Wall St...
| Can the approach get any longer??
| Doing laps on the Flake of Wrath
| Flakes of Wrath in the snow
| High up on the route.
| Pulling the surprisingly easy roof up top.
| gorgeous fall day on flakes of wrath
| | | |
| Comments on Flakes of Wrath |
|
By Tony B From: Around Boulder, CO Feb 28, 2002 rating: 5.9+
| The left hand 'direct' variation is 5.11b and is even more fun than the regular route. Note, however, that a few non-direct moves are made in the 'direct' route. It's a great problem with a complex and interesting crux. |
By Casey Bernal From: Arvada, CO Feb 28, 2002
| I felt that the crux was in the thin section in the middle of the climb. I used several wires here but didn't have all the sizes I needed. The way the crack pinches down makes small cam and tcu placements impossible. Take stoppers from about #6 to #12. The roof takes a #1 and #2 cam. fun climb |
By Charles Vernon From: Tucson, AZ Apr 15, 2002
| George, I can't believe there is any doubt about 3 stars! Amazing route. |
By George Bell From: Boulder, CO Apr 15, 2002
| I guess I'm not a fan of Wall St, it is too close to a major road for my tastes. When those potash trucks blast by just inches from your belayer it detracts from the wilderness setting! This is the best line I've done there, though. |
By Charles Vernon From: Tucson, AZ Apr 16, 2002
| I have to agree George, there's no way I can climb Wall Street more than 1/2 day on any trip. That said, I've done eight or nine routes there, all but two of which were excellent, this being the best. |
By Joel Hickok May 16, 2002 rating: 5.9
| Classic route! Classic direct top rope! You can lead the direct line too, but better have your shit together. The original route protects well. Only complaint... that damn poison ivy at the base! Of course the trucks on Potash are bothersome, but for just-out-of-town cragging it doesn't get much better than this. Try the Ice Cream Parlor for more peaceful cragging, or the River Road Dihedrals. Umm, or Indian Creek. |
By Paul Nelson Aug 25, 2002
| On the direct line, be very cautious about a loose block at the top of the crack section. |
By Scott Conner From: Lyons, CO May 27, 2003
| Definitely a 3-Star Wall St. climb. A teriffic pitch of jamming and laybacking. Do bring a set of small to medium stoppers for the crux. I cavalierly left mine at the base and had to rig up a marginal cam. A must-do and easier than the Moki Roof, IMO. |
By Shane Zentner From: Colorado Feb 9, 2004 rating: 5.9
| Number one and two camalots. Jam your way up this beautiful crack to an anchor. Save enough energy for that roof crack thing to the right. |
By Nick Strong Mar 11, 2004 rating: 5.9+
| I've loved this route for years now, but it freaks me out to climb it because I've seen two people deck on it from 30+ feet. Both of them zippered. I'm pretty sure they weren't placing correctly, though, as I've never had any problems. Also, that crap at the bottom of the climb is Poison Sumac. Two months of rashes helped me learn that. |
By rob bauer From: Golden, CO Dec 14, 2004
| Just a comment for AC/Casey B. I've climbed the route a few times over the years and always used a tied-off runner at the pinch to protect the moves up from the pinch-off mentioned. |
By utfreeclimber From: Sandy, UT Mar 21, 2006 rating: 5.9 PG13
| This climb is a super fun warm up with a variety of sorta sustained moves spaced out with killer rests. The lieback around the flake at the top is really cool. |
By Brian Scoggins From: Eugene, OR May 31, 2006 rating: 5.9+
| Harder than Visible Panty Line. Fun crux. I used all my medium and large nuts, and then doubles from .75-#2 camalot. Good stuff. |
By Mark Michaels From: Draper, UT Sep 28, 2006 rating: 5.9+
| LOVE this route! LOVE IT! The direct version 11b is recommended as TR only. The crux is at the top...the cracks down lower are 10ish with a nice rest in the middle. AWESOME. |
By Jonathan Schumacher From: Sandy, UT Jun 20, 2007
| What a killer route! Mother nature should have made 1000ft of this! |
By John Wilder From: Las Vegas, NV Apr 19, 2008 rating: 5.9
| best route at the grade on Wall st...great climb. a single set is fine- maybe a second #1 or #2 for the roof.... |
By Skyler Penrod Jul 8, 2008
| This was my second trad lead and is still one of my favorite climbs in the area. I think I placed up to a #4 Friend at the start for security reasons. Also watch out for the sand in the crack that always ensues after a good rain. |
By Devon Barker From: Glenwood Springs, CO Oct 14, 2008
| Absolutely awesome route!!! my first trad lead on sandstone and all the placements felt solid. If your up for a good challenge try the direct variation. The crux is definitely interesting! |
By Rob Davies UK From: Cheshire, UK May 8, 2009 rating: 5.9+
| Rock in this area has been trashed by rope-grooves created through people lowering off and top-roping from fixed anchors. Try looking at the photos to figure out which are the more recent ones! There are some very popular small sandstone outcrops in SE England that have been badly abused in the past by climbers top-roping, but even there it's rare to find rope damage as bad as this. Guide-book needs to state emphatically that, to avoid further damage, climbers should belay at top of pitch, then abseil, sorry rap, to ground. Come on guys, this is common sense - we don't need the environmental police on our backs. Route itself is no soft touch - in UK terms as hard as HVS 5b at Wilton. |
By Woodson From: Park City, Ut. May 16, 2009 rating: 5.9+
| Sooooo bad A$$$$! This route should not be missed, and should be repeated and repeated. The undercling is so great, and protects well, and runners here are a good call. I didn't runner it and ended with some drag. |
By Garrett Robinson From: Leadville, CO Sep 17, 2009
| The protection funkyness where the crack doesn't take cams can be really well protected with a creative tricam placement. This seemed to be more bomber than the nut placements available. |
By rick gardiner From: Grand Junction, CO, Nov 14, 2009
| I did this route rope solo, using my truck as the anchor and absolutely loved it. Good jams with an interesting reachy(finger crack)/smeary(for feet) crux that protects well with nuts. No need to bring anything bigger than a #3 camalot. I am not a fan of climbing by a major road with big trucks buzzing by and climbers bringing their families(kids and dogs)to the area. Another thing I witnessed was belayers standing in the road and not moving out of the way of traffic. Is this arrogance or ignorance? |
By Peter Swank From: Boulder, CO May 8, 2010 rating: 5.10-
| Beautiful line, with great protection all the way up. |
By Rob C. From: Freeport, ME Oct 31, 2010 rating: 5.9
| Great jams! Really fun and somewhat sustained! |
By Alex Quitiquit From: Salt Lake City Mar 16, 2012 rating: 5.9-
| Nuts and tricams, or hexes for the middle section where the two cracks/flakes meet. This gear protects the crux so make it count. Use a long sling on the roof to reduce drag to the anchors! So fun. |
By Ryan Henderson From: Pleasant View, UT Oct 23, 2012
| As intimidating as the overhang traverse thing looks, this is not the hard part. The hard part is definitely the thin section. I top roped this, but was checking out the pro possibilities while climbing. Looks interesting for sure in that thin section. My leader placed a .5 C4 in that section, but man was it tough to get out. Sounds like other people manage to place a nut in that section. Oh, this route is a bit pumpy as well, but it might have just been that it was my third day down there. |
|