Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
Do "most climbers die"?



View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums


Page 1 of 2.  1  2  Next>
 
By D Winger
Jun 16, 2011
A labor of love -- our favorite Joshua Tree climbs from 5.5 to 5.9

I'm in a conversation on Twitter with someone who believes that "most climbers die" if they keep climbing. He clarified in a later tweet (140 characters limits discussion!) that he was talking only about "serious pioneering climbers" and that he "can name as many high profile dead climbers as live ones."

Given those parameters, and assuming we're only talking about those "high profile" climbers who died as a direct result of a climbing accident or medical emergency (e.g. HAPE), what do others think of his assertion? Do most "high profile" climbers die while climbing?

One irony of the conversation was that he originally posted his theory in a message to Joe Simpson, who is, of course, alive.


FLAG
By Eric Engberg
Jun 16, 2011

This will be one of those fuzzy things that will be impossible to resolve because the definitions are inexact "Most"? "serious pioneering climbers"? "keep climbing"? "direct result"? Type of climbing - bouldering vs. 8K peaks?

And the thread will constantly get sidetracked my meaningless single data point examples.

I think you will be able to establish a correlation between the "serious" of the climber and the probability they will die as a "direct result". I don't think it means much. A serious golfer is probably more likely to die in a golfing accident (hit by ball or lightning) partly because they just spend more time being exposed.

But by almost any set of definitions I think you are going to have a hard time proving that "most" (>50%) do.


FLAG
By Stich
From Colorado Springs, Colorado
Jun 16, 2011
Coffee after freezing our asses off near James Peak.

Most climbers usually get bored with climbing, which is a gateway drug to Russian roulette and extreme ironing. Death then follows quickly. So yes, I would say that is absolutely correct.

This type of discussion seems loaded from the start, as if to prove the point that a certain type of climbing is in essence suicidal.


FLAG
By John Maguire
From Boulder, CO
Jun 16, 2011
Bastille Crack Final Pitch

xkcd.com/386/


FLAG
By Daryl Allan
From Sierra Vista, AZ
Jun 16, 2011
Me and my Fetish I guess.. ;)

The American Alpine Club, in its yearly compendium Accidents in North American Mountaineering, reported 15 fatalities in the United States in all of 2007. The highest tally in the last 57 years, in 1956, was 53. The yearly average was 25.

The British government, comparing the risks of various activities, assembled these statistics:

  • Maternal death in pregnancy 1 in 8,200 maternities
  • Surgical anesthesia 1 in 185,000 operations
  • Hang-gliding 1 in 116,000 flights
  • Scuba Diving 1 in 200,000 dives
  • Rock climbing 1 in 320,000 climbs
  • Canoeing 1 in 750,000 outings
  • Fairground rides 1 in 834,000,000 rides
  • Rail travel accidents 1 in 43,000,000 passenger journeys
  • Aircraft accidents 1 in 125,000,000 passenger journeys

rest here


FLAG
By RadDawg
From NE, GA
Jun 16, 2011
Sunrise over Cashiers valley

Let's be clear about this:

All climbers die, along with all other humans. It's going to happen, sooner or later.


FLAG
By "H"
From Garden of Gods
Jun 16, 2011
Axes glistening in the sun

Maybe they meant metaphorically. Like before marriage and kids. LOL!!


FLAG
By Daryl Allan
From Sierra Vista, AZ
Jun 16, 2011
Me and my Fetish I guess.. ;)

"... but NOT EVERY MAN TRULY LIVES!!!..." (in bad Scottish accent)


FLAG
By caughtinside
From Oakland CA
Jun 16, 2011

D Winger wrote:
I'm in a conversation on Twitter


There's your problem.


FLAG
By Chris Horton
From Tucson AZ
Jun 16, 2011
Awesomeness!

So if I use Daryl's info I'm cool if I keep my send total under 320,000, right?


FLAG
By BDergay
From Eldorado
Jun 16, 2011
Jayy-Dogg on rappel

"All that breathe, shall share this fate."


FLAG
By John Farrell
From Phoenix, AZ
Jun 16, 2011
Showing the fine art of French Freeing on  the 2nd pitch of Mars Attacks, Sedona, AZ.

Tyler Durden says, "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."


FLAG
By Culver
From Colorado Springs, CO
Jun 16, 2011
top of Blodgett's

caughtinside wrote:
There's your problem.

i was going to post the exact same thing.


FLAG
By Buff Johnson
Jun 16, 2011
 In a zoo in California, a mother tiger gave birth to a rare set of triplet tiger cubs.    Unfortunately, due to complications in the pregnancy, the cubs were born prematurely and due to their tiny size, they died shortly after birth.  <br /> <br />The mother tiger after recovering from the delivery, suddenly started to decline in health, although physically she was fine. The veterinarians felt that the loss of her litter had caused the tigress to fall into a depression. The doctors decided that if the tigress could surrogate another mother's cubs, perhaps she would improve.  <br /> <br />After checking with many other zoos across the country, the depressing news was that there were no tiger cubs of the right age to introduce to the mourning  mother. The veterinarians decided to try something that had never been  tried in a zoo environment. Sometimes a mother of one species will take on the care of a different species. The only "orphans" that could be found quickly, were a litter of weaner pigs.  The zoo keepers and vets wrapped the piglets in tiger skin and placed the babies around the mother tiger. <br />

I think most people that get into climbing are out of it within their first five or so years.

It's too committing to keep being fun,
Close call on an epic, coming to a realization of what acceptable risk is, or
Injury/death of themselves or friend.

There is probably somewhat a correlation with climbers as to avalanche and ski mountaineers.

To answer your question, I think there is risk inherent, but most don't die in climbing. I think we all come very close to it at some point in time, though.


FLAG
By John Wilder
From Las Vegas, NV
Jun 16, 2011
Hiking some 5.fun in Squish.

RadDawg wrote:
Let's be clear about this: All climbers die, along with all other humans. It's going to happen, sooner or later.


speak for yourself, dude.


FLAG
By Spri
Jun 16, 2011

Well, if you're talking about high-profile alpine climbers, which is what it sounds like he is limiting it to, I'd be inclined to agree that many of them do die. What is the death rate on Everest? Like 1 of every 3 people die on it. I guess that doesn't qualify as "MOST" but a significant number.


FLAG
By DannyUncanny
Jun 16, 2011

Spri wrote:
Well, if you're talking about high-profile alpine climbers, which is what it sounds like he is limiting it to, I'd be inclined to agree that many of them do die. What is the death rate on Everest? Like 1 of every 3 people die on it. I guess that doesn't qualify as "MOST" but a significant number.


1/10 and dropping


FLAG
By Jay D.
From The Corner Office
Jun 16, 2011
Trees.  <br />Yes, trees.

RadDawg wrote:
Let's be clear about this: All climbers die, along with all other humans. It's going to happen, sooner or later.

yes


FLAG
By Manky
From Durango, CO.
Jun 16, 2011
Pitch one of Campground Couloir. Photo by Andiken.

caughtinside wrote:
There's your problem.


Ha ha, well played sir.


FLAG
By Daryl Allan
From Sierra Vista, AZ
Jun 16, 2011
Me and my Fetish I guess.. ;)

Chris Horton wrote:
So if I use Daryl's info I'm cool if I keep my send total under 320,000, right?

Yeah, and don't even think about giving birth. That's some sick Mountain Dew chugging, ultra-uber, adrenaline mushroom cloud madness right there.


FLAG
By Steve0
Jun 16, 2011
Forest fires seen from the top of the Grand. I think they were in the Bridger Teton NF, end of August, 2011.

Spri wrote:
Well, if you're talking about high-profile alpine climbers, which is what it sounds like he is limiting it to, I'd be inclined to agree that many of them do die. What is the death rate on Everest? Like 1 of every 3 people die on it. I guess that doesn't qualify as "MOST" but a significant number.


Much lower! I think you could die on your way up and they'd still haul you to the top if you paid enough. All kidding aside, it's a noteworthy achievement, but I expect the death rate to be much lower, especially nowadays. Check out this article and see the comparison between death rates prior to 1990 and since 1990. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-thousander


FLAG
By Spri
Jun 16, 2011

I'm totally open to new stats, if any of you guys have them. Those ones were from some books I read in the late 90s.

Still though, lots of prominent alpine climbers dying all the time. I can think of 2 recent ones that were reported in the last month from Alpinist.


FLAG
By Bang
From Boulder
Jun 16, 2011
Thanks Hank Caylor!

Before I die from climbing, I think my balance in my saving account will :P, for all the gears and traveling.


FLAG
By D Winger
Jun 16, 2011
A labor of love -- our favorite Joshua Tree climbs from 5.5 to 5.9

"...in a conversation on Twitter..."
There's your problem.
LOL!

By the way, I thought his assumption of "most" was probably much too high. I was also amused that he kept adding qualifiers to his original statement that "most climbers die."

Indeed, though, if he didn't mean to qualify his assertion in any other way, I'd have to admit my belief that all climbers die, as do all other humans at some point.


FLAG
By Ryan Kelly
From work.
Jun 16, 2011
My kinda simian

DannyUncanny wrote:
1/10 and dropping


Even then, that's a ratio of deaths to successful summits, not everyone who attempted Everest in that timeframe.


FLAG
By Ryan Kelly
From work.
Jun 16, 2011
My kinda simian

Spri wrote:
Still though, lots of prominent alpine climbers dying all the time. I can think of 2 recent ones that were reported in the last month from Alpinist.


Alpinist doesn't have enough pages to publish every climber who climbed a mountain in the last quarter.


FLAG

Page 1 of 2.  1  2  Next>