Login with Facebook
 ADVANCED
Sparks Wall
Routes Sorted
L to R R to L Alpha
All That Remains T 
Divide and Conquer T 
Generic Spark T 
Go Sparky Go T 
Hawk, The T 
Ici c`est bienne T 
Jump Start T 
Jupiter Crack T 
Low Spark T 
Old Sparky T 
Rowdy T 
Skraps T 
Slings and Arrows T 
Spark It Up Sparky T 
Sparkling Gefilte Fish T 
Sparkling Prom Date T 
Sparkling Schloob T 
Sparkling Schnitzel T 
Sparkling Spurs T 
Sparkling Zygote T 
Sparks of the Tempest T 
Tom Thumb T 
Unknown T 
Unknown 5.10 T 
What a Fool Believes T 
Unsorted Routes:

Divide and Conquer 

YDS: 5.10 French: 6b Ewbanks: 20 UIAA: VII- ZA: 19 British: E2 5b

   
Type:  Trad, 1 pitch, 100'
Consensus:  YDS: 5.10 French: 6b Ewbanks: 20 UIAA: VII- ZA: 19 British: E2 5b [details]
FA: Chris Kalous, Rebecca Rusch
New Route: Yes
Page Views: 880
Submitted By: chris Kalous on Dec 4, 2006

You & This Route  |  Other Opinions (2)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
Your opinion of this PAGE:    [1 person likes this page.]
A climber formerly known as dredward sending the '...

Description 

A broken corner to a block roof kinda like Pente. Switch cracks to good hands in a corner. Layback the wideness to the anchor.

Location 

Head left from where the trail arrives, and pass between Skraps and the large boulder terrace at its base. Divide and Conquer is in the back left side of a small concave section of wall just left of Skraps, and about 100m left of the trail terminus.

Protection 

A small piece for pulling the roof, but mostly hands to big hands, to #4 camalot. A new #5 might be handy.


Comments on Divide and Conquer Add Comment
Show which comments
By BJ Sbarra
From: Carbondale, CO
Nov 4, 2008
rating: 5.10+ 6b+ 21 VII+ 20 E3 5b

You'll want mostly 3 camalots for this one, with maybe a 3 friend, a 4 camalot or two for up high, and a couple smaller pieces. Burly where it gets wide.
By Kelsey Sheely
From: Flagstaff, AZ
Apr 2, 2013

Roof is fun! Wide section is brutal, especially if you don't layback it. It's too wide for #4s at the crux.
By chris Kalous
Nov 21, 2013

I changed the description above to reflect reality a little better. I reclimbed this recently and realized that my memory had not served me well when I originally posted it here on MP.