Death by Chocolate
|6,003 page views|
Good page? (1 like)
|Type: ||Trad, 9 pitches, 1700 feet, Grade III|
|Consensus: ||5.8+ [details]|
|FA: ||Paul Ross, Layne Potter 13th Sept 2003|
|New Route: ||Yes|
|Submitted By: ||USBRIT on Sep 13, 2003|
Belay Pitch 3 . Death by Chocolate.
Location: From I.70 entrance drive about 2.1 miles to pull off on right a few yards north of a prominent wash that crosses the road.The chocolate stripped peak is easily visible from here. Follow the wash until the slot canyon below DBC is reached. Enter the slot canyon on its left side. After two scrambling sections the canyon flattens and leads to the foot of the large chocolate slab. A double anchor is located about 70' up the slab,reached by easy scramble on the right. About 35 mins walk from pull off.
P1) From the double anchors head up towards the white rock on the edge. Continue to double anchors. 2 pro bolts.190'.5.6R
P2) Continue up the junction of the chocolate and white rock to anchors on a large ledge.3 pro bolts 2 cams. 180'. 5.6R .RAP from the anchors 80'down to the right of the ledge to reach anchors at the start of P3.
P3) Climb diagonally up right passing a hollow flake(new pro bolt above flake) to another pro bolt and then up right to anchors . 100' 5.8.
P4) Easy slab up into the great red trough to some large boulders.200'5.0
P5) Straight up the big scoop to visible anchors above two small bushes. 200' 5.3.
P6) Follow the excellent chocolate rock band via a flake, the first bolt is at 30'. To anchors . 2 pro bolts. 200' 5.5R.
P7) Another nice pitch up the chocolate band to anchors . 2 pro bolts . 200' 5.4R.
P8) Straight up easy slab to anchors . 1 pro bolt . 200' 5.2R. P9 . More easy slab to Summit anchors. 200' 5.2R.. Scramble up left for about 40'to cairn and register.......
Descent: One can rap to the top of pitch 3 then a 200' rap into the descent canyon. OR 4th class slabs to the south .A little difficult to find,best to rap..
Description to hike as follows: Walk south from the finish of the climb down a ridge then couple of boulder moves up a red step,continue until passed a step across a gap then start descending slabs and shallow grooves.Start trending left(N)to a large clean slab with two long grooved cracks . Slide these continue down through bushes,then move left by a prominent flake .From here leftwards down many slabs and groove scrambles to the start to the start slot canyon. About one hour.
Friends One of each .5 to 21/2 A few quick draws, slings . Two 9mm x 200' ropes
Shows two routes A) "Death by Chocolate' 5.9B).Day...
Layne Potter nearing the top of pitch 3 . Death By...
Andy Ross on P2. 2nd Ascent of D by C
Climbers on Endless Journey . This climb links wit...
A photo of climbers on Day of Atonement . View pho...
BETA PHOTO: THe Figure on the Skyline is the photographer taki...
Kimberly belaying me on the crux
Looking back down the crux pitch
The slot on the approach
Low angle slabs start the route
You'll find the register tucked in a small alcove
Cool piece of petrified wood - look for this on th...
Andy and Gene at the start of P4
Camp for the Spotted Wolf Canyon area . In the bac...
Looking across the canyon.
BETA PHOTO: Rope up here, next to the ecstatic juniper. The br...
register. These things are fun!
Approach to DBC
|Comments on Death by Chocolate
|By Frosty Weller|
Nov 11, 2004
rating: 5.9- R
Excellent job by Paul & Layne on this. It's fun, mostly easy, runout, and fairly adventurous... and what views! Wowza, purty dang fun! DBC seems to be the best looking and most prominent line of all the Reef climbs. If approaching from the East on I-70, you can see DBC before you even get to Green River.
The hike in is cool with some short narrows in the bottom of the approach canyon. After recent rains you may even have a couple of wades here though the pools should only be waste deep max. The route has been bolted well. Even though you may only encounter 1 bolt per pitch (or none), most of the climbing is pretty moderate. Natural pro is rare so the runout nature will keep your attention. Doing the 100'+ runouts on 5.6 or so keeps things interesting during your cardio workout on the slabs.
Please, do not add any more bolts on this climb. At the time of this writing all the belay/rap stations are nice double bolt anchors placed in the best solid rock available. Most anchors are right at 200'. Note that the webbing on these will need to be replaced soon as they are already aging.... bring extra and remove the old stuff. It doesn't take long out there in the desert for webbing to fry. So, no hammer or drill necessary on DBC.
For pro, there aint much. I placed a 1.5 & 2 Tricam and #1 Camalot in the flake about 15' below the crux on pitch 3. The Tricams seemed more bomber than a cam in this flake with the rock quality. Still, if you blew the crux moves, whether or not those pieces would hold is a bit questionable. (When we were there the rock was still a little moist from recent heavy rains.) If they did fail, you will be going past and onto the belay anchors. Kind of exciting as this is the steepest part of the whole climb. To me the crux moves felt like 5.9 and pretty "R"ish. Although following, Kat walked it making it look more like 5.8. Maybe it just felt harder on lead with the potential consequences... The only other piece of pro placed on this was a #2 Camalot on pitch 5.
From the looks of the summit register this was the 4th ascent of DBC (10/23/04). Pauls route description is a good one... Enjoy!
|By Steve "Crusher" Bartlett|
Mar 18, 2005
Rappel webbing appeared in fine shape as of March 15th. Approach was dry. Paul's description, and rack suggestions seemed about perfect (ratings seem pretty subjective on these slabs, except the final pitches are lower angled). Pitch 6 was my favorite. Worth scrambling to the higher west summit for the best lunch spot. The climbing is swell, and the views are as well.
|By John J. Glime|
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Oct 23, 2005
Fantastic line. The rock on the first two pitches and on the fifth pitch is pretty sketchy... I kept thinking that the route name was given because if you stay on the chocolate rock "death" awaits. Either way, it is a great day out... thanks Paul and Layne. For the record, we were forced to wade through two waist deep potholes on the approach. But it adds to the ambiance... enjoy.
|By Jeff Stephens|
From: Carbondale, CO
Nov 19, 2008
Climbed on November 10. Fantastic, weird climb. Feels kind of hairball for the leader at times, but is just a hike, sometimes literally, for the follower. We simulclimbed the route in 4 blocks, in about two hours. Seems like the sensible way. Rappelling takes as long as climbing this one, as the ropes don't toss very far on the slab. We didn't find any anchors on top of the formation (but did find Paul's little summit register), so we downclimbed top pitch. How did we miss them??? Beautiful area, spectacular geology on display. Admire the rocks in the approach wash. Needs some more ascents to clean this line up. Rap webbing was suspiciously bleached at certain anchors. We left some cordelette behind, and backed everything up. Take a camera - fabulous vista on top.
|By John Peterson|
Nov 30, 2008
If you don't consider wading through the pools in the approach slot canyon part of the experience, you can work up gullies immediately right of the slot and find a bolted anchor that lets you rap into the slot just above the pools. I assume you can leave a fixed rope there for the return.
Nov 30, 2008
Not sure if the rain yesterday (Sat) did cause any pools on D by C approach but last week was very dry. The rap in way does not require to leave a rope as to climb back up this section is about 5.4. Of course less problem to continue down the canyon after the climb. Worst would be wet socks..
|By John Peterson|
Apr 8, 2009
April 2009: rap stations need some more attention. We didn't have enough webbing to deal with all of them. Adding a second ring to these would make them even more friendly. Some of the hangers were loose.
A great route. The crux was the easiest part - right at the nice shiny bolts. The long runouts on 5.6 were the real crux - takes a little nerve! We didn't use any wires. No cams bigger that #2 camalot. I'd go for about 6 camalots (a couple of small ones, .5, .75, 1, 2). Tricams .5 - 1.5 help too.
Watch the end of the rope on the raps - everything is set right at 60m.
The rock was mostly good - the last part of #5 and first part of #6 were the only bad bits. #6 was probably the headiest lead.
|By Tristan Higbee|
Apr 21, 2010
rating: 5.8- X
I did this route a couple weeks ago and enjoyed it, but felt like the bolting was... how should I put this... suboptimal. I'm not saying to make the thing a clip up, but zero bolts on a 200 foot pitch? Come on. Yeah, 5.0 is easy, but holds break, birds crap on you, rocks fall from above, you get a charlie horse... Stuff happens. Two or three bolts per pitch? Fine. Zero? Hmmm... A potential 400 foot death fall on 5.0 just seems a bit ludicrous.
Yeah yeah, "if you don't like it, climb somewhere else or put up your own route." Whatever. This is public land and this is a public forum I'll say whatever I damn well please about it. And I WOULD put up my own routes there to suit my tastes if I knew what's what and what's where. +1 vote for cleaning up the eastern reef slab section here on MP and organizing it by the three trailheads. Or I'd happily buy the guidebook (or pay you $30 for copies of your organized notes!) if it comes out anytime soon.
I thought the crux pitch was easy 5.8. My second thought it was 5.7. We saw potential cam placements on pitches 2, 3, and 6. I'd take purple, green, red, and yellow Camalots (#.5 through 2) in the future. The webbing on the anchors as of April 2010 was good enough to rap from.
One thing I'd add to the route description: On pitch 5, instead of going "Straight up the big scoop," go up and right. That's where the bushes and anchors are.
More beta, lots of pics, and a TR are on my blog here. According to the summit register, our ascent was the 14th of DBC.
|By Ben Folsom|
Apr 22, 2010
rating: 5.9- R
We've gone over this argument plenty of times in the past. If birds crap on you, or you happen to get a charlie horse when you are way run out, man up and deal with it! If you think DBC is scary, you should try some of the R or X routes!!
Apr 22, 2010
Hi Tristen..As Ben says we have been through this debate quite a few times. First I would be delighted to see you put up routes on the Reef that suit your taste and protection comfort level.However you must admit its rare "5.11+ climbers" get a thrill out of 5.0 pitches! Regarding the crux of Death by Chocolate (named after a favorite cheese cake ..not death), about a year ago we added that pro bolt next to the 5.8 move,as prior to that the only pro (15' below) was a cam behind a hollow flake which I felt sure would pull ... See comment above by Frosty.. So you got lucky .Prior to that new bolt it may have felt like 5.9 with a steep potential fall of about 70'onto one's second. If you cannot find unclimbed rock for your new routing in the 6 miles let us know and we will give you some clues. Believe me its easy to find unclimbed (most routes are marked on the topo photos) rock both steep and slab.I myself use grade R for a long fall but in my opinion not fatal. and the X ..be careful. To sum up I would suggest that climbers that claim their grade to be 5.11 or higher at places for example like Indian Creek or sport climbs confine themselves here to climbs no harder than 5.7 or 8 until they become familiar with this area,as this is rock climbing how it used to be!
Apr 22, 2010
Tristan, can we not have to talk about reducing routes to the lowest common denominator, its insulting to the first ascensionists who do routes like this in good style.
It also robs other climbers who want to challenge themselves not just physically but mentally.
I've walked under routes like the Bachar-Yerian and do I wish there were a few more bolts on it, sure. I would love to do the route and I am capable of climbing that grade but I don't have the mental fortitude to try it, so I just leave it be.
I would be very disappointed if someone did add bolts to it and I would hope you would feel the same.
All this coming from someone who says they like putting up FAs is strange as I would think you would have more respect for the way these type of routes are put up.
I would also like to remind you that these routes are being put up ON SIGHT by an elderly gentleman carrying both a drill and rack on his back.
|By Frosty Weller|
May 13, 2010
rating: 5.9- R
Come on… is that just a troll Tristin? Well, at least you actually use your real name to troll and flame. But please, next time read MtnProj Guideline #1: don't be a jerk?
Does this really sound like a good way start a productive conversation on the number of bolts on a “5.0 pitch”?
“Whatever. This is public land and this is a public forum I'll say whatever I damn well please about it.” So… so there!
Not long ago Tristen you complained about too many bolts on Pygmy Alien, a 5.7. And now you come back a month later whining that there are not enough bolts on DBC… and that a bird might poop on your head and cause you to fall and get hurt?
Pygmy Alien 5.7
Mar 5 - Too many bolts on the wall ruin it.
Maybe you’re just confused. After looking at your blog it's obvious that you are. You knew the DBC was runout, but yet you went and did it anyway.
It’s great that you are such an amazing climber that you can rave about your ticks and solo’s on MtnProj and your blog, boast about downgrading the DBC moves with a spankin’ new bolt at the crux... that‘s so very impressive.
Seriously though? Until you grow a sack and/or some manners, it may be best for everyone if you just stay out of The Swell. Stay on Wall Street, or in IC where you can plug and hang on your cams at will.
If someday you do decide you might like to try adventure climbing again, be a man and don’t go home crying to mommy (and everyone else) that the badass senior citizen who did the proud FA didn’t make it safe enough for young Tristen.
But gee, now that I think about it... yeah, I really want to climb the Bachar-Yarian too. Shouldn't there really be more bolts in that? I mean really, it's dangerous for gosh sakes... and, and a bird might crap on my head. Someone could get hurt!
If you somehow want to read more of Tristen's flaming and confusing rhetoric about this bolt/no-bolt issue go here (and thanks to Ben and Andy for helping to try and wrestle the tar baby that Tristen seems to have enjoyed creating):
|By Craig Martin|
May 21, 2010
rating: 5.9 X
Sounds like the new bolt is gonna get some climbers into trouble on the upper pitches. Maybe it should get removed to return the route to its original condition. Most climbers able to safely negotiate the crux pitch in its original condition would have had very little problem on the upper pitches.
May 22, 2010
Hi Craig ..Sounds like you have not done this climb ? Well I guess if we remove the pin ( as I did the FA ) and the next person does take a possible 70+ whipper directly onto his second,he will probably be in no condition to climb the other pitches !!!. Actually if you do this route the pitches above are a piece of cake and just fun.Of course some climbers are a bit paranoid about pro ,more so if they mostly climb sport routes.
|By Craig Martin|
May 22, 2010
rating: 5.9 X
Actually Paul, I have done the climb, and before the addition of the new bolt. I would not have chimed in otherwise. You and I communicated via email about it afterwards, it was a few years ago, I don't expect you to remember. I risked the 70' fall you are talking about. It was the most memorable moment of the climb for me. The rest was no big deal, and that is my point.
Most of the comments post bolt addition say something to the effect that the crux was easy and the hard part was the runout 5.6 pitches. That was not the case when I did it. The addition of the bolt at the crux has changed the nature of the climb and made it more appealing to certain climbers who think they are ready for runout 5.6. When I climbed it you had to be ready for runout 5.9, or at least have confidence in gear in a hollow flake, get past that and you would have no problem on the upper pitches.
May 23, 2010
Sorry Craig ..A senior moment on my part. I mainly placed that extra bolt on this climb as this and another route 1000' of Fun have become the trade routes of the slabs,so thought it might help first timers get a easier introduction to one of the longer climbs,and it would be a very nasty fall in those cams pulled. As I am sure you are aware there are now plenty of routes in this area that will give you a few heart in the mouth moments.I guess if climbers want the original commitment on D by C they can skip clipping that bolt ... All the Best.. Paul
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Apr 9, 2012
Thanks for the unique experience! Definitely some bold pitches!
As of today, the road is easy 2wd under the highway, but the anchors need new webbing. I'd have brought some if I knew they were all equalized webbing.