Crack Attack 5.11-
| 7,064 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Trad |
| Consensus: | 5.11- [details] |
| FA: | Jay Smith |
| Submitted By: | Ben F on May 1, 2001 |
| |
Danger Dan Wright at home.
Add Photo Printer View
Description As you face the cliff, this route is towards the left end. Keep walking left until you see a non-generic crack with a small A-shaped roof almost half way up the line. You won't miss it - it's striking. This crack starts wide, goes to fist-large hands in a flaring slot, hits the small roof and then leads to less than favorable sizes until you reach the anchor ledge. The business above the roof is mainly a steep section with thin hands to rattly fingers until you are just about at the ledge. This climb is nice because it varies in size and it actually has a few nice face hold on it. It's not a bad choice for the beginning 11- Creek leader.
Protection This route has a nice fixed anchor at a small ledge roughly 90 feet off the deck. You can belay from up here if someone is seconding the route. For gear, bring a set of cams from #1 to #5 Friends. Doubles are only needed for 1.75, 2 and possibly the 2.5 and 1.5 Friends (bring triples if you're worried). There are also a couple opportunities for large bomber stoppers.
Jay Smith leading Crack Attack at the Montrail Spl...
| BETA PHOTO: Me on Crack Attack at the bulge in the center of t...
| BETA PHOTO: Me on Crack Attack near the top.
| Joseffa Meir leads Crack Attack (11-)'. Photo by ...
| Tony Bubb follows 'Crack Attack (11-)'. Photo by J...
| Crack Attack, Battle of the Bulge Buttress, Indian...
| Crack Attack, Battle of the Bulge Buttress, Indian...
| Crack Attack
| Crack Attack
| Kurt starting the thin hands of crack attack
| Kurt cruising crack attack
| Keo Bolton leading Crack Attack.
| Keo high on the thin final section.
| Enjoying the splitter above the chockstone roof mo...
| Fett Attack
| Photo by Beth Lim
| | |
By Tony B From: Around Boulder, CO Nov 9, 2001 rating: 5.11-
| I have both lead and followed this route and did not think it necessary to have a wide cam to protect it. 1.5-2.5" cams were the crux pro, as the upper section is thin hands. Fun route. |
By Ben F From: Benfield, Kolorado Nov 9, 2001
| The larger cam can be placed lower on the climb for added comfort. Look at the bottom and see if you want to protect the lower section. If not, then don't bring anything larger than a 3.5 Friend (1 will do). |
By Anonymous Coward May 17, 2002
| I brought 3 #4 friends and placed them all, and I am an extemely confident leader. |
By Rob Dillon From: '81 Sunrader Apr 6, 2004
| I really enjoyed the variety and elegance of movement on this one-- it's a lot more interesting.than yr. typical monotonous I.C. enduro-fest. |
By Anthony Everhart Mar 14, 2005
| This is a great route to climb but lots of the rock is shitty. There is a way to climb it that doesn't involve touching the large block that sounds real nice and solid (chimney to the face hold & span the block.) If you look at the climb you'll notice the slot under the roof is going to get larger when the roof falls out. After the roof/block there is more not solid rock leading to a section of hollow splitter! Great variety though. I would be solid on this one, there are many other low 11's to take a ride on. A. Everhart |
By superagave Feb 28, 2006
| Tony and Ben are both right (just like an after school special). The big cam isn't needed, but it sure adds to the comfort. I will say that if you do opt for the biggun, put a long runner on it. |
By Rob Kepley From: Westminster,CO Oct 15, 2006
| Varied climbing with a thin hands finish. I highly recommend this one. |
By Tavis Ricksecker From: Bishop, ca Nov 26, 2007 rating: 5.11-
| I used only 1 #3 camalot on this one. I probably used one #2, many (six or more) #1's, several (3?) #.75's, one #.5, and a yellow TCU for the roof, plus at least 3 slings to reduce rope drad. This is really a great route! My favorite at the Creek so far, and definately my proudest onsight. Exposed, techinical, difficult without being overly pumpy. Oh yeah, and I yarded on all the 'loose' blocks and nothing bad happened. :) |
By Bob Rotert Mar 2, 2008
| Just an FYI since the FA wasn't listed for this write up. Jay Smith did the FA on this classic. |
By Lon Black Apr 2, 2008
| One of my favorite lines at the Creek...varied and 5.fun. Excellent pitch. A #5 C4 protects the top of the wider section. A couple climbers said pro in this section wasn't needed. It isn't needed. No pro is needed, but if you don't want to take a 20 foot fall, you might wanna place it. |
By Phil Lauffen From: Louyuppie May 26, 2011
| Way, way easier than scarface which is also rated 11-. Walk your 4 up the starting crack. Then a 3, a 2, and a 1 before you bust over the roof. A 2 after the roof, then maybe 2 1s, and 3 .75s. |
By Crotch Robbins Apr 24, 2012 rating: 5.11b
| Felt harder than Scarface for my big hands. Great route. |
By claramie From: Boulder, CO Nov 24, 2012
| If you don't have a big cam for the start, it's pretty easy to protect the finger crack on the right with anything between blue and yellow aliens. No problem to do this if you have your leg all the way in the wide crack, or if you are liebacking. |
By Brian Stevens From: Boulder, CO Apr 9, 2013
| I agree with the above comment that a small cam works in lieu of a big one at the start. I got in a red c3, but can also understand the desire to place a #5 at the start as well. Brought 1 #4 for the pod/flare thing. As the above comments also state, there's quite a bit of funky rock on this throughout the route. There was a particular rock that is in the pod about 3/4ths of the way up the route that I tried to trundle, but was unable to get it out by hand. |
|