Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
The Hand
Show routes:
Select route...
Back in Slacks 
Back in Yaks 
Cardboard Cowboy 
East Face/Hand 
Father on Fire 
New Saigon 
Perfect Kiss (P1 of Rock Atrocity), The 
Power Bulge 
Quest for Balance 
Rock Atrocity 

Back in Slacks 

5.11c

   

FA: Paul Glover
Type: Sport
Consensus: 5.11b/c [details]
Length: 1 pitch, 50 feet
Views: 409 page views

Submitted By: Leo Paik on Mar 28, 2002


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (11)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

Subject to Seasonal Closures MORE INFO >>>

Starting upo Backin Slacks, at the end of the fun ...


Description 

This is a nice little sport climb on the S face of the Hand. Hike up the Mallory Cave Trail to the Hand, short of Mallory Cave, up a gully between Der Freischutz and the Hand. Find an inviting set of slightly overhanging huecos just right of an impressive face climb trending left (Power Bulge 12c).

Enjoy big buckets as you ascend a slightly overhanging huecoed wall past a couple bolts. Gain a rest. Find a balancy, slightly awkward crux as you face climb angling right on vertical terrain towards the anchor.

This traditional rating might be a bit soft.

This route was previously recommended by Bobbi Bensman as a good route for redpoint training.

You can TR Power Bulge from this anchor.


Protection 

4 QDs plus 2 slings for the anchor



Comments on Back in Slacks Add Comment
Show which comments
By Tony B
From: Boulder, CO
Oct 4, 2004
rating: 5.11c

By it's easiest path, the route is no harder than 11c, and maybe easier. This includes going right to the pin over the lip. I agree with the comment about the long sling for this piece, because otherwise a fall will take your rope across a rock edge. If you were to go straight from the 3rd to 4th both without reaching the top of the slope, then this thing would probably be a lot harder. The low position of that bolt (which I clipped at my waist) almost implies that was what was intended. Does anybody here know for sure?

By Willie Mein
Dec 22, 2004

When this issue came to our (Flatirons Climbing Council) attention through a post by Greg Hill on Monday 12/20/04, we were concerned that this was an act of malice. Upon further investigation, it was determined that the removal of the bolts was done as a concern for safety. Although the responsible party (RP) was aware of the ban for placing new bolts, RP was not aware that a Notification for Bolt Replacement form must be obtained from OSMP to remove and reinstall any fixed hardware in the Flatirons (OSMP).

The RP has since submitted a Notification for Bolt Replacement form with OSMP and agreed to pay restitution for the replacement of the bolts. The RP and/or other community minded individuals will be completing the maintenance on these routes soon.

I am posting this information on behalf of the Flatirons Climbing Council, so that the climbing public is aware of the situation and status of these routes, and so that people are informed about the process for bolt replacement in the Flatirons.

It is not OK to remove, replace, or tamper with existing fixed hardware anywhere on OSMP without first obtaining a Notification for Bolt Replacement from OSMP. All bolts and other resources on OSMP are considered property of The City of Boulder. Those that do damage to natural or climbing resources can be cited and/or prosecuted. To do maintenance of existing fixed hardware, obtain and submit the required form. This form can be obtained at http://www.ci.boulder.co.us/openspace/visitor/climbing/bolt->>>>>. Additionally, there are limited opportunities for the addition of new bolted routes in the Flatirons through a process similar to Eldo. See www.FlatironsClimbing.com for complete info.

A word of caution when posting:Thanks to the immediacy of the internet, people's preoccupation with posting, and a lack of complete information, this issue has been blown out of proportion. Although posting the initial finding that bolts were removed is appreciated and warranted, fanning the flames of controversy does not benefit the climbing community.

The process, not the individual should be the focus here, and therefore I have chosen to post information without names. It is unlikely that the RP will post anything (although it may seem surprising) because some people don't visit this site. Please take comfort in knowing that there is no conspiracy, secret cover up, or something going on behind the scene.

By Willie Mein
Dec 31, 2004

FYI - The maintenance on these routes is scheduled to be completed by the end of January 2005.

By ?????
Nov 14, 2005
rating: 5.11a

Fun jugs down low...