Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
Left Side
Show routes:
Select route...
Art of Dreaming, The 
Bedtime Story 
Bobsled Direct Start 
Bobsled, The 
Caffeine Buzz 
Chore Boy 
Daily Grind, The 
Golden Slumber 
Lucky Strikes 
Morpheus 
Mr. Sandman 
My Buddy 
Napster 
Not So Obscure 
Sleepless Child 
Sleepless in Boulder 
Smell the Coffee 
Snooze Button 
Something Obscure 
Tooth Fairy 
Wake Up Call 

Chore Boy 

5.10b/c

   

FA: Bob D'Antonio, Vaino Kodas, 2002
New Route: Yes
Type: Trad, Sport
Consensus: 5.10 [details]
Length: 1 pitch, 100 feet
Views: 662 page views

Submitted By: Bob D'Antonio on Dec 10, 2002


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (22)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

BETA PHOTO: Chore Boy


Description 

Chore Boy starts just right of Snooze Button and uses the first bolt of that route. Clip the first bolt and angle into a blocky, shallow corner. Make a weird move left over a small overhang and crank up a steep wall on good holds to a shallow crack. Climb the crack up to and over a small overhang (gear) and reach a good ledge below a steep headwall. Power up the steep headwall past three bolts on good edges and sidepulls to the anchor.

Several hundred pounds of rock and dirt were removed from this route. The route is now cleaned of loose rock and most of the dirt and should clean up nicely after a few rain storms.


Protection 

10 bolts plus some medium-to-small gear. 2-bolt anchor.



Add Photo Photos of Chore Boy
Plotinus Wall, left side

BETA PHOTO: Plotinus Wall, left side

Dave leading this cool route

Dave leading this cool route

The original Chore Boy.

The original Chore Boy.

Chore Boy, Plotinus Wall, Boulder Canyon

Chore Boy, Plotinus Wall, Boulder Canyon

Racking up for a trip up Chore Boy. I decided to rap myself from the anchors to avoid rope drag over the edge of the headwall, stretched my rope to the stopper-knots.

Racking up for a trip up Chore Boy. I decided to r...


Add Comment Comments on Chore Boy
Show which comments
Comments displayed oldest to newestSkip Ahead to the Most Recent Dated Aug 21, 2007
By S. Kimball
Feb 4, 2003

AKA...Run For Cover Jim Erickson! Cleaning up splendidly. A tad stiff for 5.10 b/c, S.K.

By Anonymous Coward
Feb 15, 2003

This is a really cool route with several good cruxes. .10b/c is a good rating for this route, no harder

By Ray Snead
Feb 18, 2003

The bolt count is actually ten - a single bolt was added (not by the FA party) on the very day that provided that little bit of excitement for Jim.

As for difficulty, the reachy bulge at the 4th bolt or so is certainly harder for shorter climbers, which may explain any controversy.

This is actually a really good route, and much better than it looks.

-R

By Scott Conner
From: Lyons, CO
Jul 12, 2003

Excellent route. .10b/c seems about right. I'm 6'1" and could juuuust reach the key hold at the crux. Shorter climbers will definitely have to do a hard intermediate move to get there. This route has some great climbing. The upper headwall is steep and fun with a tricky top out. Nice and long, too. Stretched our 60m right to the half way mark.

By Tony Bubb
From: Boulder, CO
Jul 16, 2003
rating: 5.10b

One of the better 10s on the wall. A single crux of maybe 2 moves can be done a number of ways, but most will feel harder than the given grade. One way, at the given grade, makes it all finesse, but does require 5'9" height or greater if I am guessing right (I'm 5'10" but have LOOOOONG arms and had 5" to spare).

~5.10b. The shorter, the harder...

By Roger Wilkerson
Oct 14, 2003

A fun route. I thought the upper 'headwall' (the last 3 clips) made the route. Not terribly hard, but you'll probably be a bit pumped by that point.

The reachy move at the 4th? bolt may be avoided by going a bit right. I'm 5'9" and found the 'direct' way too reachy to keep it at the grade.

The only real thing detracting from this climb is the (lack of) belay position.

Anyone feel like telling the 'Run for Cover' story?

By Bob D'Antonio
From: Superior, CO
Oct 14, 2003

Ok, here is the story. There was a good-size rock/boulder than was on the ledge below the upper headwall. In my infinite wisdom, I thought I could carry the beast down in my lap as I was being lowered. I almost made it to the ground but got pumped from the weight of the monster. I yelled to everyone to clear the area and let the thing go. Little did I know that "climbing legend Jim Erickson" was just starting to make the climb up the hill. My heart sank. O-my-god I am going to kill a legend. Jim, with his cat-like reflexes (pretty impressive for a man his age) dodged the missiles and survived the rest of the hike to the wall. I also survived what would have been a lynching if the beast would have taken Jim out!

By Roger Wilkerson
Oct 15, 2003

One more thing - I don't feel gear is really needed on this route. A couple of the bolts are widely spaced, but in areas of easier climbing.

I only lead sport into the 10b/c range and felt fine without supplemental gear.

By Peter Beal
From: Boulder Colorado
Oct 16, 2003

The relationship between difficulty and protection is not as straightforward as that. On this route, there is at least one15-20 foot stretch with no bolts. If, for whatever reason, you fall, it's going to have serious consequences. Merely saying that gear is not required because you lead a given grade and had no problem can mislead others who may not savor 40 foot fall potential regardless of difficulty. On this route, there are sections that are very closely bolted and others that are not. If you have no problem soloing 5.7, which is basically what you're doing on the runout part, then don't bring gear (and don't screw up). Otherwise be prudent and take a light rack. If you find you didn't need it, great.

By ac
Oct 16, 2003

If you can protect a climb to prevent an injurious fall, you owe it not only to yourself, but your partner, who will be forced to deal with you and your injury. I agree with Peter that falls sometimes happen well within your ability (remember Derek Hersey?).

By Roger Wilkerson
Oct 16, 2003

Peter / ac -

Sorry guys, I guess my comment wasn't worded very well. I wasn't trying to get folks on the route w/o gear, but just relating my experience on the route.

I had gear with me, planned on using it, and ended up at the next bolt before I realized it...

Roger

By Richard M. Wright
From: Lakewood, CO
Oct 16, 2003

Bob - a simple solution. We have lowered trundelers that were far too large to carry by drilling a bolt in them and then lowering the rock via a block and tackle pully system attached to a higher bolt. Most of the ropes will handle the job, but a static line has saved beating up the lead cords. Even a two-pass pully will handle some big loads (several hundred pounds), and smaller blocks can even be lowered with a GriGri. Beats getting stoned to death.

By Anonymous Coward
Oct 20, 2003

Climbed this Sunday 10/20. Great route! There's is a large block (1/3 'frig) just to the right of the last bolt that is quite loose. There is an X on it now, but it could have monumental consequences if somebody pulled it off.

By Dave Holliday
From: Louisville, CO
Oct 31, 2003

Great route. I think it's the best of the 10s on Plotinus. I led this recently after having followed it several times, and with Peter's comments in mind, I took supplemental gear. I ended up not using it. My experience was similiar to Roger's: I got within reach of the bolt in the runout section sooner than I anticipated and without many problems so I climbed up a couple more feet and clipped it. I agree that a fall from right below that bolt would be bad as there are plenty of features to hit on the way down.

As several people have pointed out, a long reach makes the lower crux straightforward and that was the case for me. I thought the crux was topping out after clipping the last bolt.

- Dave

By Greg Hand
From: Golden, CO
Oct 31, 2003

Roger & Dave, as Ray indicated above, the need for gear was reduced by the addition of one bolt a few months after the route was put in. There was a section of about 40 feet (below the top 3 bolts) where gear was needed. This was also the area where the block was removed that nearly took out Jim. Although I don't think it was that close but did make a good story. I drilled the bolt. The rock in that area seemed a little crusty. The only reason you would fall is if the rock broke, and it seemed that the flakes over that small steep section could snap off.

To add another perspective on the "lookout Jim" episode, I was lowering Bob as he was to remove the flake. We moved everyone from the area (Jim was not yet in the area). Next thing Bob was holding this large flake screaming to be lowered. I got him to about 40 feet from the ground when he released the object. That was about the time Jim was ascending the fall line of the approach gully. He started hopping pretty quickly for an "old" man!

By Anonymous Coward
Dec 8, 2003

I agree on not needing gear. we hadn't read this site, of course. Being in sport-weenie-mode, it didn't occur to us either to bring gear, or to desire it while doing the route. I didn't notice the run-outs.

However, like so many things, if I had had some gear with, I probably would have used it.

By Clare Shemeta
Oct 30, 2004
rating: 5.10d

At the lower crux, there is a little sidepull crimper you can use for left hand. It's my secret hold. It's about 6 ft left of the 4th bolt. I'm 5'11", and I can't reach that top hold. But using this crimper, you can work the feet up without barn-dooring and voila - reach the top holds, and you're done!

By Bill Farrand
Mar 18, 2007

This route is definitely harder than 5.10b for shorter climbers. Maybe it is 10b if you're over 6' but for me (5'7") the crux was desperate. The route to the left was a lot easier in my opinion.

By DFrench
From: Boulder, CO
Aug 21, 2007
rating: 5.10b/c

I racked up for this route with a slew of small-to-medium gear after reading these posts and it ended up being nothing but dead-weight.

The "run-out" sections were always accompanied by easier climbing (and a nice new bolt) and I felt that to stop and fiddle with a placement would have been a waste of strength.

That said, the event of a spontaneous fall (aren't they always spontaneous?) probably would have resulted in a rather unenjoyable ride down the feature-ridden face.

The moral of the story: Bring gear if you like to feel safe, but whatever you do, get out and do this route. Dream Canyon is a very special place and is held very dear by those who visit.

Many thanks to Bob D. and Vaino for their route-setting and effective bolt-placement.

A final note: I chose to rap myself to avoid rope-drag on the edge of the headwall. I came all the way to my stopper-knots on a 60m rope.