Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
Rock Island I
Show routes:
Select route...
Destroyer 
Independent 
Unknown 
Unknown II 

Destroyer 

5.10c

   

FA: Cisco Manzo 1996
Type: TR
Consensus: 5.10c [details]
Length: 1 pitch
Views: 768 page views

Submitted By: Cisco on Sep 25, 2002


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (7)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

Davy about to get spanked on
Destroyer



Description 

This route is actually on Rock Island 1, and is pretty much right in front of the bridge. This route is also very easy to toprope, but you will need long runners to reach over the lip from the anchors.The starting point for this is about 10m from the 5.7 route called Independent Route which is in Fred Knapp's Front Range Topropes. Start under the roof, moving quickly left and up the outside edge of the roof, reach up to a good hold with your left hand and head for the sloping, right-angling crack, do a hand over hand, and then a strenuous pullup to an undercling. From here, it gets easier to the top. The crux comes at putting in gear in the crack, but it is right at the start. This could probably be bouldered, but it would be a bold undertaking.


Protection 

Small to medium nuts and cams.



Photos of Destroyer Slideshow Add Photo

BETA PHOTO

Comments on Destroyer Add Comment
Show which comments
By Biggwave Dave
Sep 25, 2002

I feel this route goes at a stiff 5.9+. A strong head and good tech sense should bring ya thru the crux w/ a bit of ease. It really reminds me of the brillant routes in N.M.; Questa dome comes to mind.

By Cisco
Sep 26, 2002

You're right, Big Wave, actually the rating I posted is what it was before I watched (in horror) some Frenchie with a hammer pull loose a piece of the old handhold because he thought it would fall loose under his weight. It is probably in the stiff 5.10-5.10a class now. When he pulled the rock loose, it created a nice foothold that made a nice rest that was previously not there.

By James Beissel
From: Boulder, CO
Apr 26, 2008
rating: 5.11a

Maybe something broke - this felt a good deal harder than 10c. Awkward and probably harder for those with bigger fingers.

By Caleb Phillips
From: Boulder, CO
Jun 24, 2008
rating: 5.10c

Yeah. The thing is, it's a really short problem. After the pullup to the flake, the rest of the climb is 5.7. The two or three crux moves are solid 5.11 (IMHO), but given how short it is, I think 10c isn't a bad rating.

By Tony B
From: Boulder, CO
Jun 25, 2008
rating: 5.10

Kinda unaesthetic.

By Caleb Phillips
From: Boulder, CO
May 6, 2009
rating: 5.10c

Was on this today. Pulled off a couple pieced of dangerous choss that must have loosened up over the winter because I don't remember them last summer. I don't think they effect the grade unless you climb it substantially differently than I do. Adds a foot after the crux, but there's another good foot there anyway.

Still feel like 10c is a good grade. It's essentially a V3 boulder problem that's 15 feet off the ground and surrounded by 5.7ish stuff. Maybe unaesthetic overall but I really dig the crux move - sequencey and powerful.