BETA PHOTO: Hold The Line starts on a ramp about 30' left of R...
Description
Rossiter calls this a 9, and I believe Rolofson a 10. It felt harder than 9. Demands good slab technique and is bolted a bit for the taller person, even though the bolts are closely spaced. That said, the route begins 15 feet left of the left-facing dihedral that is P1 of the Bihedral route and ascends a low-angle slab which steepens near the top. Two tricky sequences get the blood flowing at the third and fifth bolts. A great route.
Protection
9 well-spaced bolts to a two-bolt anchor with rings.
I thought it was a great route - at least, much better than Bihedral to the right of it, which seemed like a sandbag on both pitches with poor gear on the second pitch. It felt maybe a bit harder than 9 on a couple of moves, but the rating is probably accurate for a slab.
I also thought this route 5.10- in one section (3rd bolt or so?). I enjoyed the route as well as the Bihedral, I would not say the Bihedral is much worse. It is just trad climbing vs. sport.
This was a great route, albeit harder than the 5.9 rating it was given by Rossiter. I'd agree with 10a. Requires very good footwork and slab climbing techniques. One of the better sport routes I've done in the canyon.
I'd say 10a around the third bolt. I stepped right thinking the vertical seams might provide some solace but made for a tricky return back left. The rest felt 5.9. A great climb!
Good line on great rock. I agree on the 10a rating. We linked this with the 2nd pitch of the Bihedral route--very nice. A few things: I would suggest climbing past the anchors (about another 15-20ft) to the base of the the 2nd pitch to set your belay--much more comfortable and easier to manage your rope. Second thing-leave the nuts and Aliens on the ground; the second pitch is all about .75"-4" cams. If you don't have a 3.5" or a 4" cam, you're in for a dicey runout. Last thing-there are good slings on a tree at the top that you can rap off. Really fun combination--it might just have been good timing, but despite the crowds on the Riviera below, nobody was up there.
By Ron Olsen Administrator From: Boulder, CO Aug 3, 2002 rating: 5.10
According to Rolofson's Boulder Canyon Sport and Adventure Climber's Guide, the name of the route is Rhodian Shores and the rating is 10b. First ascent by Steve Muller, Dianne Barrow and Mark Rolofson, July 1996. I'd agree with a 10b or 10c rating; this crux is harder than the 10a cruxes on the nearby Bihedral Arete. This is an excellent, sustained pitch; one of the best of its grade in Boulder Canyon.
I would rate this a 10a as well. 3rd and 4th bolts are the crux. Great slab climb!
By Leo Paik Administrator From: Westminster, Colorado May 22, 2003
If it matters, the crux seemed to be between bolt 2&3 per 5 folks with whom I've climbed this. High step L or R foot works. Maybe L foot is better?
By Ernie Port From: Boulder, Colorado Jun 15, 2003
Definitely the crux is the 4th clip, involving a thin finger tip seam about eye level and a sequence of delicate foot placements out left, working up and left to a nice ledge and much better stances. Have the draw in your mouth ready to clip. Two very small openings in the seam favor skinny finger tips. Felt (10) to me. The upper half is also interesting with an undercling and a flake with more positive holds. Fun stuff. 3 Stars.
The crux for me was getting up to and past the third bolt. I also ended up stepping a bit up and to the right to make the third clip, but, as mentioned above, doing so makes for a difficult traverse back. Very solid and continuous climbing. I remember only eight bolts to the anchors.
This was a great route with moves all the way to the top! Does anyone know a way to get dogs up to the Bihedral area without making your dog do a "5.12-R-dog-move"? Aspen had a harder time climbing up there then we did!
I believe Rossiter's rating was taken from feedback from my partner and me. Our 5.9 rating was relative to traditional 5.9 climbs in BC; we weren't familiar with the new rating system back then. Good alternative first pitch to the bihedral. I did Over the Hill (real 10b) a few weeks after this route--OTH felt MUCH harder. So 5.9 is probably accurate.
Nice route. It feels a little contrived after the fourth bolt. The holds and features draw you to the left and it then becomes "interesting" to come back and clip the fifth bolt. I skipped that clip, headed easily up for the horizontal crack, and clipped the sixth bolt. Maybe I skipped a crux but it felt like the obvious thing to do given the features in that area.
By Ken Cangi From: Boulder, CO Nov 20, 2007 rating: 5.10b
Foot-intensive, interesting climbing. Some of the bolts aren't in the best spots, but they'll get you where you want to go.