By Andrew C From Colorado Springs Sep 23, 2009
| I was at an outing this spring for some climbing in Vantage, WA. My friends and I were climbing next to some climbers from BC and Quebec. After an hour of climbing the main french guy, who apparently is a sponsored climber, came over and looked at my 9.8 mm rope, then my Gri Gri then very arrogantly asked "is this a special Gri Gri?" My friends and I looked at each other confused. Then he went on to tell us we shouldn't be climbing on such a small rope without a "special Gri Gri". We went on the rest of the day without incident.
My question is, is there some truth behind what he was saying? Or was he just being an arrogant know-it-all? I've never heard of a "special gri gri" for smaller ropes. |  FLAG |
By Greg D From Redgardentown, Co Sep 23, 2009
| Yes. It is called a Cinch. Rated for much smaller diameter ropes.
As you know the Gri Gri is only rated for 10.0 and larger. But, many on this site claim it will lock up just fine with most any size rope if you treat is like an atc. That is, you never let go of the brake hand and don't assume it is auto-locking. It is not! Tell frenchy to go smoke a cigarette. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| the specs are 10-11; but seen 9.5 dropped on it without consequence. He's right though, technically, you're out of spec.
There is an industrial model for larger applications that has panic stops. Haven't seen one for smaller |  FLAG |
By WiledHorse From NoGo Sep 23, 2009
| use mine down to 9.2. works fine if you pay attention and use it correctly. |  FLAG |
By Boissal From UT Sep 23, 2009
| People from Quebec are not French... A friend uses a gri on his 8.9 and hasn't dropped anyone yet. It wants to slip though. |  FLAG |
By Brian Scoggins From Laramie, WY Sep 23, 2009
| Greg D wrote: Yes. It is called a Cinch. Rated for much smaller diameter ropes. As you know the Gri Gri is only rated for 10.0 and larger. But, many on this site claim it will lock up just fine with most any size rope if you treat is like an atc. That is, you never let go of the brake hand and don't assume it is auto-locking. It is not! Tell frenchy to go smoke a cigarette.
Petzl says 9.7 on page 7 of the technical specifications.
This dude, however, didn't know that and quite obviously expected you to blow him for his "safety tip". |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| ah 9.7, yes it does in one little also-mentioned type sentence. It also says it in their device comparison table; though everything else says 10 to 11; so technically at 9.8, you're in spec, then.
(ps - I hate that new method for a lead belay) |  FLAG |
By J. Albers From California Sep 23, 2009
| Boissal wrote: People from Quebec are not French... A friend uses a gri on his 8.9 and hasn't dropped anyone yet. It wants to slip though. Sure, they are not French, but FRENCH Canadian, and with the F word comes the requisite dickishness. (I'm mostly kidding, I have met some very nice Quebecois folks). As others have said, a gri gri works fine on pretty much all ropes. As they get smaller though, you may actually need to lock off initially to get it to cam. Next time tell frenchy to get in his zamboni and go smoke zee zigerettes elsewhere.
....and Greg, don't you treat your Cinch like an ATC the same as I treat my gri gri, no matter the diameter rope? |  FLAG |
By Andrew C From Colorado Springs Sep 23, 2009
| Boissal wrote: People from Quebec are not French... A friend uses a gri on his 8.9 and hasn't dropped anyone yet. It wants to slip though.
They were all speaking French, had French accents and said they're from Quebec and moved Squamish...i dont know
Yeah everyone I know who uses a GriGri with smaller ropes haven't had problems either. I agree caution should be used, defintitly don't want to completely depend on the auto-lock. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| you shoulda just said you had a special American brake hand; it's much more reliable |  FLAG |
By Greg D From Redgardentown, Co Sep 23, 2009
| J. Albers wrote: ....and Greg, don't you treat your Cinch like an ATC the same as I treat my gri gri, no matter the diameter rope?
Yep! I treat all devices basically the same: not guaranteed without a brake hand. The only exception... atc guide/reverso in autoblock mode. It is acceptable to let go of the brake strand in this mode. Frighteningly, I came into the belay on a multipitch alpine route recently. My partner was belaying me straight off the anchor above him (which is great with the right device/rigging) using an atc (no autoblock mode). Belaying like this makes it difficult to catch a fall as discussed by Kolin Powick @ BD. Even though the route was scary and runout, I was relieved to get back on lead where he was belaying properly. |  FLAG |
By Marc H From Lafayette, CO Sep 23, 2009
| I use my grigri on 9.* ropes without a problem. My grigri, however, isn't used all that much; I only use it sport and wall climbing. Not long ago I was out climbing with a friend who uses his grigri on all of the climbs he does (sport, trad, etc) and therefore had a lot more use than mine. When we opened both devices up, we noticed that mine was a lot tighter in the rope-sitting area. Because of the amount of use his gets, he had worn off a bit of the metal in the guts on his device and we noticed that it didn't catch nearly as easily as mine.
So while I think most grigris are fine on 9.* ropes, I would say that wear and tear should be a consideration when using smaller diameter ropes with grigris.
--Marc |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Sep 23, 2009
| Marc H wrote: When we opened both devices up, we noticed that mine was a lot tighter in the rope-sitting area. Because of the amount of use his gets, he had worn off a bit of the metal in the guts on his device and we noticed that it didn't catch nearly as easily as mine. I don't know about the catching part, but I have noticed, like Marc, that the cam on the gri-gri wears down quite a bit after a few years of moderate usage, to the point of being rather surprising. At least to me. |  FLAG |
By Jason Halladay From Los Alamos, NM Sep 23, 2009
| Marc H wrote: So while I think most grigris are fine on 9.* ropes, I would say that wear and tear should be a consideration when using smaller diameter ropes with grigris. --Marc
I hadn't really thought of that but it makes sense. Thanks for bringing it up. I'm yet another one who regularly uses a GriGri on 9.8 rope. (I also hadn't seen that petzl states 9.7 in the documentation--always thought it was 10mm).
Also, I do like, and have switched over to, the new Petzl-recommended way of lead belaying with a GriGri. It took some getting used to but I like it. |  FLAG |
By Crag Dweller From Denver, CO Sep 23, 2009
| i've taken a number of 15-20 foot falls with a 9.8mm rope and a gri-gri. it worked fine.
as for the comments about making sure to keep your hands on the brake, the brake hand should always be on the rope regardless of whether you're using an ATC or a gri-gri, a 9.2mm rope or an 11mm rope. why? 'cause i might be belaying next to you and i don't want my day ruined by the sight of your friend splatting on the ground. |  FLAG |
By Paul Davidson Sep 23, 2009
| I'm curious, anyone have any first hand experience with catching a Force Factor 1 fall on a gri when a smaller rope is being used ?
While Gri's seem to work ok on smaller diam ropes in normal usage as long as you're paying attention, I wonder what happens in that small percentage of falls that occur outside normal usage ? |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Sep 23, 2009
| Paul Davidson wrote: I'm curious, anyone have any first hand experience with catching a Force Factor 1 fall on a gri when a smaller rope is being used ? While Gri's seem to work ok on smaller diam ropes in normal usage as long as you're paying attention, I wonder what happens in that small percentage of falls that occur outside normal usage ? I think this relates to what Crag D. said. If you're using a gri-gri properly -- i.e., like an ATC or a hip belay for that matter -- it will never fail no matter the diameter of the rope. If you let the cam catch the fall -- essentially just letting go with the brake hand -- the failure rate will probably go up. Substantially. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| not necessarily, when you do go thinner with the rope you lose some ability to hold. |  FLAG |
By Beagle From Your Mama Sep 23, 2009
| What are you people talking about? Diesel engines say "Diesel Fuel Only" but I know a number of people that put "other fuels" in without incident. And when baking, if you use bananas instead of eggs, that works too. And if you're catholic and preach sex is for procreation only, using birth control is fine! Things are meant to be experimented with, just don't try to sue if you take it a little too far. |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Sep 23, 2009
| Buff Johnson wrote: not necessarily, when you do go thinner with the rope you lose some ability to hold. True, smaller diameter causes greater slippage no matter the structure of the holding device, which is why the less endowed should never... Never mind. |  FLAG |
By Richard Radcliffe From Louisville, CO Sep 23, 2009
| Beagle? Buff? you guys are the same person, aren't you? |  FLAG |
By Gregger Man From Broomfield, CO Sep 23, 2009
| Experience from last Thursday: The Cinch caught my unexpected 50-foot aid climbing fall. With an 11mm big wall rope that sucker locked up tight if you looked at it crossly, brake hand or no brake hand. Letting a long loop hang down on the brake hand side added some extra security when we were eating, etc. at the belays. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| nah, beagle's a pussy --- so if I live by the straight & narrow, I can sue God? |  FLAG |
By Beagle From Your Mama Sep 23, 2009
| Buff Johnson wrote: nah, beagle's a pussy --- so if I live by the straight & narrow, I can sue God? It's a walk off. 10 o'clock at the old Members Only Warehouse, you should know where that is... you're a dinosaur. And, you can do whatever you want with you're little friend God, who ever that is. |  FLAG |
By Paul Davidson Sep 23, 2009
| Richard Radcliffe wrote: ... it will never fail no matter the diameter of the rope.
I am wondering if that's a true statement. I'm not doubting Richard's veracity, just looking for actual evidence. Hence the interest in FF1 (or greater) falls.
I have heard of ATC's running in high force falls. Not failing, just running for a bit. |  FLAG |
By Buff Johnson From Coniferous, CO Sep 23, 2009
| statically you can hold about 600 ft lbs with a 10.5; this goes down to about 350 ft lbs with a low 9 using a typical tube/atc type device. It's just a matter of how much a duration you have as to whether you can control the fall throughout or if you're gonna lose it. Makes a good case for belay gloves, though. |  FLAG |
|