Fear of Flying 5.9
| 2,013 page views Good page?  |
| Type: | Trad, 2 pitches |
| Consensus: | 5.9+ [details] |
| FA: | Joel Moorem, Dale Zgraggen, 1975. |
| Submitted By: | Blitzo on Sep 10, 2006 |
| |
BETA PHOTO: Fear Of Flying. Photo by Blitzo.
Add Photo Printer View
Description Climb a 5.7 flake to the upper corner, Follow the corner (5.9) to The Lower Platform. Can be done in one pitch with considerable rope drag. Rap off back side, 80 ft.
Protection Pro to 3in.
Monica just past the crux. Summer 2010
| | |
| Comments on Fear of Flying |
|
By caughtinside From: Oakland CA Mar 8, 2007
| best line I've done at the spires! |
By 426 Mar 10, 2007
| Dan Osman onsight free soloed this and thought it was sandbagged. So did I when I did it with a rope. There is some secret beta though that I found later on that helps.... |
By caughtinside From: Oakland CA Mar 13, 2007
| The old guidebook called it a .9+. I thought it was pretty sustained, you could probably get away with calling it .10a. Good fun. |
By Ol' Toby From: CO Feb 8, 2009 rating: 5.9+
| Technical, delicate, superb! A true classic at the grade. I prefer to link the corner into one long pitch with runners at the bottom. |
By PumpkinEater From: Sacramento Jun 24, 2009
| .10a in my opinion. Either that or I was tired, or my shoes were too loose, or I was dehydrated, or my trick shoulder was acting up. |
By Aerili From: Reno, NV Sep 8, 2009 rating: 5.10a
| This route is fantastic and incorporates so many facets of climbing technique. Climb it as one pitch!!! The gear recommendation of pro to 3" baffles me. You certainly do not need anything over 1". Also, be sure to take plenty of very small cams (that would be < #0.3) and very small nuts. |
By ShibbyShane From: Estes Park, CO Oct 2, 2009 rating: 5.9+
| There's a reason someone told me this route is "one of the best at the Spires." Fun and thought-provoking climbing through most of the climb, with the corner being the obvious crux. I found this climb to be both technical and physical, as you're smearing your feet on tiny divots and pushing your body into the corner with constant body tension, or at least that's how I did it; some of the finger slots were too small to really stem up the corner so I had to improvise. I'm sure it's just because I'm out of shape but I'm sore the day after climbing this! Definitely the hardest "5.9" I've climbed. |
By snowhazed From: Oakland, Ca Mar 20, 2010
| The first time I climbed this it felt sandbagged a tad- but I say it's legit 5.9. If you stay oriented with your feet more to your left than underneath you and expect the bit of thrutch, feels secure. |
By Aerili From: Reno, NV Jun 28, 2010 rating: 5.10a
| Everyone knows 5.9+ is code for 'as hard as/harder than 5.10a'. ;-} The route name is appropriate for many of the moves encountered. The flake start is more like 5.8 with thin, polished feet imo. |
By Blitzo Aug 24, 2010
| Great route! |
By Scott T From: Alpine Meadows, CA Apr 11, 2011
| Truly exquisite! There is definitly a standout crux, while the rest is thought-provoking and varied. Decent rests give you a little time to decode the next sequence. |
By dinosaurattack Jul 25, 2011 rating: 5.9+
| w/r/t gear size. If you climb it in one pitch you likely won't need a #3; however, it will come in handy while building an anchor if don't link the two pitches. Excellent sustained climb. |
By Aerili From: Reno, NV Jul 27, 2011 rating: 5.10a
| I took a friend up this last year and broke it into two pitches since she was a bit out of shape and I wanted to be able to see her on the crux. Still didn't need anything over a #1. YMMV. |
By B RAD Oct 18, 2011 rating: 5.9+
| So Good! I got stuck for a few minutes trying to figure the crux moves, but pulled it off. Was able to squeeze a #2 in the belay, but didnt really need it. Emphasis on nuts. Still a bit sore though.. |
|