Big tricams to protect offwidths?
|
A friend and I were thinking about getting some bigger tricams as an alternative to size 4+ camalots. Right now we don't have any wide gear and we're cheap. |
|
I love smaller tricams. |
|
The larger tricams can be very unstable. A bad experience with a number 7 tricam may have indirectly led to Luebben's invention of the big bro? |
|
I carry/use the big Tricams (5, 6, & 7) as needed. |
|
Yeah man. Get on Big Guy with a buncha tricams. Heh. |
|
Henry Big Bros are the trick if yer cheep. they cover a wider range and are stable wen your trying to pass them . now Big Guy would be tuff with just Big Bros.. but with some Big Balls you could do it. |
|
Yer Gunna Die... Ask Niels from SLC how that works. He and Alf walked up to Big Baby with a #4 Camalot a bigass Tricam and a #6... Skipped the pin and placed a tricam a bit past that. Continued past the tricam into more #5 C4 terrain about 10 feet and the thing fell outta the crack. The funniest thing was the sound of it hitting the inside of the crack and wall on the way down... dink, dink, dink. He looked down, then up and said, " Well, a #6 won't fit here!" He continued to fire the rig because he eats nails for breakfast but I woulda pooped big in my pants... Yer Gunna Die. |
|
I broke my ankle after falling on a small tricam placed in an offwidth. Given, it was a hail marry piece I put in just because I knew I was peeling off, And it probably wasnt set very well. But it did pop. I dont place tricams in offwidths anymore. Just because. |
|
cms829 wrote:I broke my ankle after falling on a small tricam placed in an offwidth. Given, it was a hail marry piece I put in just because I knew I was peeling off, And it probably wasnt set very well. But it did pop. I dont place tricams in offwidths anymore. Just because.Why would you place a small tricam in an offwidth? |
|
Go mow some lawns or something and buy yourself real gear. |
|
Allen Corneau wrote:I carry/use the big Tricams (5, 6, & 7) as needed. Sure, they're not highly stable but I've never had a problem getting them to sit well. I do usually sling them to help make sure they stay put. If you're only going to need bigger gear once in a blue moon then go for it. FYI: REI has the #6 and 7 on sale right now for $25 and $30 (respectively). Tricams for saleYeah, the REI sale is part of what prompted this thread. Seems like you're the only one saying to go for it though. For everybody else telling me I'm gonna die, maybe offwidth wasn't the right term. I was thinking of routes like the Mace in Sedona, where you need at least a #4 but it's still not pure offwidth technique. I would be ok with doing the Mace with big tricams and I'm wondering how much more you could do with them before they are too limiting. Obviously Big Guy is out of the question, but where exactly is the cutoff point where they stop being useful? And is it worth the $30-50 for gear that I will eventually outgrow? |
|
I have the number 7 and I carry it if there is a big crack on a route cause I don't really have anything bigger than a 3.5 camalot. when it's placed well, you can hang a truck off of it, but I do find strong placements are hard to come by. it's so big that it's hard to find a spot in the crack for it to sit just right in. It's really great when you find a passive placement for it. |
|
My tricams have resided in a box for the last 12 years . Some people swear by them, others swear at them. |
|
Ryan Williams wrote: Why would you place a small tricam in an offwidth?In a constriction, however it was flared as well. like i said it was a shit piece i threw in before i blew...next piece caught me Edit: after typing I realized that my situation had nothing to do with the original question of larger gear... LOL. My mind is shot this morning...father is in surgery. |
|
If you like tricams and know how to use them, go for it. Bigger tricams are easy to kick out as you go past them though and don't push as well as cams. I have all the tricams and use them when I can but the bigger ones are usually reserved for backup pieces on longer routes or anchor builders. Big bros are great for offwidth. Huge range, cheaper than cams, light, and I don't worry about kicking one out. |
|
Rob Dillon wrote:My tricams have resided in a box for the last 12 years.How much you want for them? I'm half serious. Thanks for the input, everybody. Right now I'm leaning toward getting a 6 and 7 from REI - I figure that they will still be worth the money even after I eventually get big cams. |
|
a cam is more useful for the money, you can push em up as you go ... and this is coming from someone who uses the smaller sizes extensively |
|
I think you need to ask yourself what kind of climber you are. Could you kill two sport climbers in a knife fight? If so, you might be able to utilize such pro. I only know of one guy like that. |
|
Henry Braun wrote: Right now I'm leaning toward getting a 6 and 7 from REI - I figure that they will still be worth the money even after I eventually get big cams.Once you get big cams they will be paper weights. Put the $55 towards a #4. |
|
They are great supplemental gear that looks badass/goofy as hell but aren't a replacement for large cams. They can be bomber but can be easily knocked out, I wouldn't climb too far above them. Bros are great, often more useful than the big tricams but also don't place well in flaring constrictions and can (at times) be tedious to place. Bros also double as rope guides and are great for keeping the rope out of the crack, i.e. after a roof pull. A lot of pro/cons of these pieces depends on the terrain you're climbing. But I think we'd all agree that large cams are the most consistently bomber and easily placed pieces for wide cracks. |
|
Henry |