Home - Destinations - People - Partners - Forum - Photos - What's New
 ADVANCED
Green Slabs
Show routes:
Select route...
Blade Runner 
David and Goliath 
Fathers Dazed 
Grass is Greener..., The 
Green Eggs And Cams 
Greenhorn 
Here and Gone 
Hooterville 
Jump for Joyce 
Krack a Tack 
Little Jack Corner 
Missing in Action 
Missing the Action 
Monkey Business 
My Left Foot 
No Stars 
Pettycoat Junction 
Rock Candy 
Samson and Dalieback 
Time Warp 
Toy Roof 
Wits End 
Wrench Warfare 
Wrist Rocket 
Yurt Monkey 

Rock Candy 

5.6

   

FA: Unknown
Type: Trad
Consensus: 5.7 [details]
Length: 1 pitch, 60 feet
Views: 337 page views

Submitted By: Almonzo on Oct 1, 2002


Add Photo  Add Comment 

You and this route  |  Other Opinions (11)
Your todo list:
Your stars:
Your rating: -none- [change]
Your ticklist: [add new tick]
 Printer Friendly View

Rock Candy, Green Slabs


Description 

Looking for an easy and fun 5.6 gear lead? Look elsewhere.

Squeezing the Lemmon rates this a 5.6 and gives it a star, which is absurd. Climbaz.com gives this a 5.9, which may be a bit too rough. Still, this isn't the place to learn gear placing skills in a mellow environment. The climb follows a chimey-ish corner for about 40 feet and then turns up a flaring groove up to a pair of chains. There's very little to recommend here.

This, and the adjacent Toy Roof (5.9), can easily be top-roped.


Protection 

Nuts and a couple of larger cams



Add Comment Comments on Rock Candy
Show which comments
By Bobby Hanson
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Nov 30, 2004
rating: 5.6

I disagree. I wouldn't say this climb was stellar, but I had fun on it. I certainly didn't think it was a 5.9!!! The pro was all pretty solid. I don't remember feeling that any of it was particularly runout.

Bottom line: if you are visiting for a short while, skip this one. Go climb Chimney Rock or something on North Fin. If you are looking for a decent little 5.6+ that you haven't done, this one isn't that bad. At the very least, you get to practice some finger locks and stemming at the start.

By Scott Tucker
From: Tucson, AZ
Feb 28, 2006

Defnitely not 5.6. Maybe not 5.9 either, but I think a 5.7 leader would be a bit unhappy at the crux of this one. Agree that it's not great but worth doing if you've exhausted the rest of Green Slabs. Just don't be surprised if it's the hardest 5.6 you've seen.

By Desicon
Mar 2, 2006
rating: 5.7 R

I do not like this climb, and I have a strong suspicion that it is dangerous for the unintitiated...

Rock Candy does have some fun and interesting moves (as Bobby Hanson points out) and my hat is off to anyone who nails this route onsight -- including the first ascensionists -- but think about this one carefully if you are a genuine 5.6 or 5.7 leader -- maybe top rope it first?

Calling Rock Candy a 5.6 has always bothered me, and I would NEVER put a beginning leader on this route. If you are secure with leading 5.8s, and you have a goodly amount of trad-climbing under your belt, it should be a snap for you. But the hand placements of the pro on this route are trickier than you might think/ expect. I would rather solo this climb than try to adequately protect it, although Bobby Hanson found it securely protectable.

Scott Tucker's evaluation is probably valid -- in giving it a 5.7 rating for onsight leaders -- though it may only be 5.6 for top ropers or those leaders who are used to doing 5.10s.

After rainfalls, this crack can get VERY muddy, very loose!

As Almonzo and Bobby Hanson both put it, there are far better routes in the 5.6 to 5.7 bracket elsewhere -- maybe you should find one?

By Bobby Hanson
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Apr 20, 2006
rating: 5.6

There is a second pitch here as well. The second pitch truly is runout, and goes up the face across the gully from the top of the first pitch. It has been many years since I climbed it, but I would guess it to be a 5.8R (or possibly X) face climb. If I remember correctly, there are some small nut placements to be had. This pitch certainly is NOT recommended (though I did have fun leading it).

By Christian
From: Tucson, Az
Jul 7, 2006

It's a typo, ClimbAZ has EFR calling it a 5.9 when in reality he calls it 5.6..

To me felt more like 5.7+/8- but of course I don't know sh*t about chimney/offwidth technique.. Did get to place my #3 for the first time here though..

By Kirk Barrett
Jan 12, 2007
rating: 5.7

I loved it when it was over, I think it was my tenth lead climb, felt well protected, used my 3.5 camalot towards the top. Great fun for new trad leaders.