Home - Destinations - iPhone/Android - Gyms - Partners - Forum - Photos - Deals - What's New
 ADVANCED
A question for women who climb harder than their boyfriends/husbands



View Latest Posts in This Forum or All Forums


Page 3 of 3.  <Prev  1  2  3
 
By Cynthia Adams
Jul 11, 2011

And there are not guys who would rather spend their weekends climbing than with their girlfriend's?


FLAG
By Fat Dad
From Los Angeles, CA
Jul 11, 2011

Cynthia Adams wrote:
And there are not guys who would rather spend their weekends climbing than with their girlfriend's?

Absolutely. Probably lots of them. I think we'd both agree about how much that tells you about how committed he is.


FLAG
By Tony B
From Around Boulder, CO
Jul 11, 2011
Tony Bubb enjoying the good "clipping holds" (hardy-har-har) while climbing 'Circumcision (6b)' at Nanyang Wall, in the Batu Caves area of K.L., Malaysia. Photo by Kenny Low, December 2006

Cynthia Adams wrote:
And there are not guys who would rather spend their weekends climbing than with their girlfriend's?

That might have been a rhetorical question... but I'll give it a shot. My answer is not as simple as yes or no:
If she is not going to climb, I guess it leaves me with that choice to be made. It sure would be easier if she were a climber.


FLAG
By BrianH
From Santa Fe NM
Jul 11, 2011
Bob's Been to Joshua Tree!

Phil Lauffen wrote:
I may be going out on a limb here, but guys in general seem to only have female friends that they are at least mildly sexually interested in. I think this is hard for girls to understand, but common sense to guys...? [...]


Absolutely. In the Land of Men's Brains there are no bright lines, only gray areas...

I think many men are perfectly comfortable thinking of platonic partners in ... uh ... other equally active situations. 999 times out of a 1000 nothing comes of it. But the thought is there. That may be one reason guys have more trouble knowing that their girlfriend is climbing with other guys.

Also I've heard of girlfriends/wives who come along and read or hike or whatever. I think it would take a very Enlightened male (maybe even a SNAG) to feel comfortable doing this on a long term basis.


FLAG
By Woodchuck ATC
Jul 11, 2011
bouldering at RRG

Alicia Sokolowski wrote:
You sure about that?


OMG,,,I forgot about that 'dude'. Slick with women on the lanes, yes he is.


FLAG
By Tommey-James
From Boulder,Colorado
Jul 11, 2011

Absolutely. In the Land of Men's Brains there are no bright lines, only gray areas...

That is perfectly said


FLAG
By alpinista83
From San Francisco, CA
Jul 11, 2011
Levitating

BrianH wrote:
I think it would take a very Enlightened male (maybe even a SNAG) to feel comfortable doing this on a long term basis.


Not all men are pigs. I'd say only 75% of my partners are and would wholeheartedly agree. I didn't say they were not a fan of seeing naked women. Unless they're cruxing out and seeing their healthy ankles flash before their eyes, their heads are in the gutter more often than not. Sure, y'all are hardwired pervs. We get it. Women know that men are visually driven even in their platonic endeavors. No argument there. What I'm trying to say is that you can be a loyal boyfriend, a pig and *still* have a great female climbing partner with no ulterior motive to want to bang the living shit out of her after a jolly, good summit.

It takes a pretty special kind of guy to find their partner even remotely attractive after handing her a baby wipe while she takes a crap off the side of a portaledge. Call me old fashioned, but I think most women wait until a year into their relationship before pulling that off without a second thought.

My climbing partner and I talked about this over the weekend (hi Tyler! <- definite pig)
I asked him why he likes climbing with girls. He said he's done the online partner call thing and finds that he doesn't get along with a lot of the guys that he climbs with. The women, on the other hand, aren't competitive, they're more sensitive, easy to talk to and we giggle and listen way more than we scoff and spray. It doesn't mean we get special treatment. Nor does it mean things "get complicated". He has a girlfriend. Tall. Skinny. Smart. Spectacular rack. Dimples. Does his wish they shared an unrequited love for climbing? No, not really. They share a lot of stuff and the time they spend together is cherished and appreciated.

I think my partners would agree that there are a lot of pros to partnering with a woman whom they don't find sexually interesting, not even in the mildest sense. Their real partners also tend to be less distrusting and more relieved that the father of their children has a partner, that they've met, that is safe and will, without fail, return their husbands back to their home with ten fingers and ten toes.

TL;DR I guess there are a lot of Enlightened male climbers in California.


FLAG
By Cynthia Adams
Jul 11, 2011

Well, and more nicely said than what I was thinking!


FLAG
By jamie lynn miller
Jul 11, 2011

Hi there,

I'm Jamie Lynn, and my friend Chris Kalous and I host a climbing podcast called Off Belay...everything climbing without leaving the ground. It's free, online at: offbelaypodcast.com or downloadable on Itunes.

We discuss oh so many issues related to the climbing lifestyle, and we recently our ""Relationship" episode.

Personally, I feel it's a fundamental challenge to have a partner who is less motivated/passionate/into climbing. There's the quality time spent together, the shared zest for the lifestyle, the mental and physical warm fuzzies we all feel through climbing; I think it'd be hard to date someone who wasn't in the loop. And as a woman, I feel there are added social pressures that affect our relationships, which men don't necessarily face.

It's kind of caveman-esque, but I think it's true: society, even our climbing culture, still thinks it's natural/normal for a man to go off and do his outdoor thing, have big adventures, be passionate about something that takes them away from his woman. At some really fundamental level, men are still expected to be independent, self-reliant and autonomous in this way.

When women are faced with the same desires - i.e. to climb a lot, or to climb hard, and to spend that time that takes them away from their partners on a regular basis, it seems to become more problematic. I think most men get kind of resentful, kind of suspicious and feel kind of neglected.


I've overheard many "I'm scared to break up because I don't want to lose my climbing partner" conversations between women over the years; I don't think men have these conversations nearly as often. Currently, I'm not in a climbing relationship, and I struggle with losing climbing partners to new boyfriends, or potential new climbing partners to suspicious girlfriends.

I'd like to think this disparity can be resolved and certainly, there are all sorts of variations on the relationship theme; but nonetheless, the issues are there and there are a lot of them to sift through.

Check out the podcast. I think you'll dig the discourse. Again, Off Belay, at: offbelaypodcast.com. Love to hear from you!


FLAG
By Chris Miller
Jul 11, 2011

Alicia Sokolowski wrote:
You sure about that?

"That creep can roll man."


FLAG
By BrianH
From Santa Fe NM
Jul 12, 2011
Bob's Been to Joshua Tree!

alpinista83 I agree with everything you say. I very strongly agree with your partner who prefers to climb with women. It is less competitive, more light hearted and just plain fun. In general. I've had partners of both genders who just didn't work out.

Climbing relationships are hard!

I'm not going to get into the vastly different ways men and women view sexuality, attraction, relationships and what not.

But my comment you quoted was not meant about guys who you're climbing with. Reading over it, I can see how I didn't write that sentence very well. I was talking about the suggestion that the less gung-ho boyfriend tag along to hike, or read or whatever while his girlfriend was off climbing with a compatible climbing partner.

I posit that most (not all) guys would have a difficult time in this scenario. I don' think it necessarily makes them "pigs", it may just mean that their ego is a little overdeveloped, or that they still hew very strongly to traditional notions of gender roles; something we all seem to do to a greater or lesser extent.

In any event, all successful partnerships, whether platonic or sexual, are a strange and wonderful alchemy. I think it's pretty close to impossible to come up with hard and fast, "either/or" rules about how it should work.

To the OP, I hope this is not hijacking your thread and excellent question, that is not my intent.


FLAG

Page 3 of 3.  <Prev  1  2  3