Turkey Rocks accident
|
If you have concerns about safety in the area please reach out to the local climbing nonprofit in the area. The Pikes Peak Climbers Alliance, they work with the forest service and help manage the area. Turkey is a trad area and the local ethic is to not bolt when protectable by removable gear. Climbing accidents are a hazard of the sport, it is sad and tragic when the occur. The best best way to mitigate the risk is education. If anyone has information on what caused the failure please reach out to the PPCA and let them know what happens so this sort of thing can be taught in some of the free climbing clinics the teach. |
|
Let say land managers decide that it's too dangerous to let climbers climb without fixed anchors on the Turkey Perch and surrounding crags. What would PPCA do then? Would they adhere to their ethic and chop bolts or they would abandon climbing there since it would be unethical? Speedy recovery to the injured climber. |
|
Fehim Hasecic wrote:Let say land managers decide that it's too dangerous to let climbers climb without fixed anchors on the Turkey Perch and surrounding crags. What would PPCA do then? Would they adhere to their ethic and chop bolts or they would abandon climbing there since it would be unethical?Quite possibly the most stupid and ill-informed post i have ever seen on Mtn Project. |
|
Bolting the perch would be a knee jerk reaction to a unfortunate accident. |
|
Ron Pivo wrote: Quite possibly the most stupid and ill-informed post i have ever seen on Mtn Project.Because? |
|
BigFeet wrote: Was this human errorYes. If you have a TR anchor fail for any reason other than being hit by a meteor, it's human error. Not that I'm blaming the victim--one of the hallmarks of being human is making mistakes. That's why the robots are taking over. I'm glad the climber survived. Those are life-threatening injuries, but still not a bad outcome for doing a 50-footer onto the rocks. I hope his or her recovery goes as quickly as possible! |
|
Fehim Hasecic wrote: Because?Your lack of understanding of the close working realationship that the organization made up of climbers has with the rest of the climbing community. |
|
Clarification/Update from group member/friend of the injured climber: |
|
I'm very surprised everyone talking about the Perch being hard to set a TR on, especially the top of LHJ. The top of that climb is a flat ledge with car sized boulders leaning against one another. Remember that safe is generally simple, which in this case means slinging the pinch between boulders. If you actually do find anchor building difficult here I recommend hiring a guide to show you the basics. That being said I'm glad the victim is recovering and I hope they forgive whoever built that anchor. |
|
Fehim Hasecic wrote: Because?Because you apparently don't know that land managers have a duty to protect the resource, not the user. There is a long history in the U.S. related to wilderness and fixed anchors. Find out about it, and you'll understand why your post doesn't make sense. Not to say that land managers don't think about safety issues. It's just that their first duty is to make sure that the resource is preserved for future generations. Turning the Perch into a toprope mecca does not serve this purpose. Nor should we as climbers be in the business of making our inherently dangerous activity safe for all. There is this thing called personal responsibility that attracted many of us to the outdoors and climbing in the first place. |
|
Google "group size and decision making". This is a very important topic for a lot of life's situations. Unfortunately, human failings are built into all of us. Often these failings show up in groups larger than 4. |
|
Brad White wrote: Because you apparently don't know that land managers have a duty to protect the resource, not the user. There is a long history in the U.S. related to wilderness and fixed anchors. Find out about it, and you'll understand why your post doesn't make sense. Not to say that land managers don't think about safety issues. It's just that their first duty is to make sure that the resource is preserved for future generations. Turning the Perch into a toprope mecca does not serve this purpose. Nor should we as climbers be in the business of making our inherently dangerous activity safe for all. There is this thing called personal responsibility that attracted many of us to the outdoors and climbing in the first place.I stand corrected. I'm neutral on this matter, bolted anchors. Either way it doesn't matter to me. If they're available, sure, I'll use them. If not, well, it doesn't bother me a bit, I learned how to climb at similar place that adheres to same ethic, building anchors, SERENE anchors was a must. Maybe my question was a bit out of touch with reality, but I don't think that it's not impossible that in foreseeable future this ethic might change. Seeing how climbing is getting more popular, more accidents are unavoidable. So, it's either new climbers learn the craft or the community comes up with alternatives to prevent accidents from happening (which in itself is a pipe dream). |
|
On behalf of the PPCA in light of the recent climbing incident at Turkey Rocks, first and foremost our thoughts go out to the injured climber as well as the fellow climbers, friends, and family who may have been affected. To our knowledge, it is suspected the anchor failure was due to a sling rolling off of a boulder shock loading a .3 BD Camelot. The injured climber is alive and is expected to recover within 6-10 weeks after breaking his pelvis and several facial bones. Also see post by Jordan Hirro for a firsthand account. |
|
Bump for the above |