Mountain Project Logo

Helmets

amarius · · Nowhere, OK · Joined Feb 2012 · Points: 20
john strand wrote:Sounds like your partner should pay more attention...or find another partner.
Was climbing at RRG/Miller Fork, relatively new area. I was belaying when my partner pulled off a decent size flake off the wall. Even though I was wearing a helmet, the rock cut a sizeable hole in rope tarp. But, because I was wearing a helmet my rope survived the encounter.
Perhaps my not wearing a helmet would've made not one zilch of a difference, but I am not adventurous enough to find out.
john strand · · southern colo · Joined May 2008 · Points: 1,640

That's because most climbers today want everything handed to them

Climbing can be dangerous..no matter what

Alex Bury · · Ojai, CA · Joined Jun 2012 · Points: 2,376
John Badila wrote:But how many of us wear a helmet for walking around? It's just a matter of time. . . walking helmets.
From that article:
"A bike helmet is a fine substitute for walking helmets, so there's no need to take it off when you get off your bike. Keep it on throughout the day for maximum safety."

And please refrain from committing microagressions while you walk around in your helmet.
llanSan · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Aug 2014 · Points: 130
T Roper wrote: Really we should all wear helmets when leaving the house in the AM.i wear mine more and more as I get older. Especially at the gunks.
About Helmets in Lynn Hill´s own words:
Some years ago I was struck by how many false things I had believed, and by how doubtful was the structure of beliefs that I had based on them. I realized that if I wanted to establish anything in the sciences that was stable and likely to last, I needed – just once in my life – to demolish everything completely and start again from the foundations. It looked like an enormous task, and I decided to wait until I was old enough to be sure that there was nothing to be gained from putting it off any longer. I have now delayed it for so long that I have no excuse for going on planning to do it rather than getting to work. So today I have set all my worries aside and arranged for myself a clear stretch of free time. I am here quite alone, and at last I will devote myself, sincerely and without holding back, to demolishing my opinions.
I can do this without showing that all my beliefs are false, which is probably more than I could ever manage. My reason tells me that as well as withholding assent from propositions that are obviously false, I should also withhold it from ones that are not completely certain and indubitable. So all I need, for the purpose of rejecting all my opinions, is to find in each of them at least some reason for doubt. I can do this without going through them one by one, which would take forever: once the foundations of a building have been undermined, the rest collapses of its own accord; so I will go straight for the basic principles on which all my former beliefs rested.
Whatever I have accepted until now as most true has come to me through my senses. But occasionally I have found that they have deceived me, and it is unwise to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.
Yet although the senses sometimes deceive us about objects that are very small or distant, that doesn’t apply to my belief that I am here, sitting by the fire, wearing a winter dressing-gown, holding this piece of paper in my hands, and so on. It seems to be quite impossible to doubt beliefs like these, which come from the senses.
Another example: how can I doubt that these hands or this whole body are mine? To doubt such things I would have to liken myself to brain-damaged madmen who are convinced they are kings when really they are paupers, or say they are dressed in purple when they are naked, or that they are pumpkins, or made of glass. Such people are insane, and I would be thought equally mad if I modelled myself on them.
What a brilliant piece of reasoning! As if I were not a man who sleeps at night and often has all the same experiences while asleep as madmen do when awake – indeed sometimes even more improbable ones. Often in my dreams I am convinced of just such familiar events – that I am sitting by the fire in my dressing-gown – when in fact I am lying undressed in bed! Yet right now my eyes are certainly wide open when I look at this piece of paper; I shake my head and it isn’t asleep; when I rub one hand against the other, I do it deliberately and know what I am doing. This wouldn’t all happen with such clarity to someone asleep.
Indeed! As if I didn’t remember other occasions when I have been tricked by exactly similar thoughts while asleep! As I think about this more carefully, I realize that there is never any reliable way of distinguishing being awake from being asleep.
This discovery makes me feel dizzy, which itself reinforces the notion that I may be asleep! Suppose then that I am dreaming – it isn’t true that I, with my eyes open, am moving my head and stretching out my hands. Suppose, indeed that I don’t even have hands or any body at all.
Still, it has to be admitted that the visions that come in sleep are like paintings: they must have been made as copies of real things; so at least these general kinds of things – eyes, head, hands and the body as a whole – must be real and not imaginary. For even when painters try to depict sirens and satyrs with the most extraordinary bodies, they simply jumble up the limbs of different kinds of real animals, rather than inventing natures that are entirely new. If they do succeed in thinking up something completely fictitious and unreal – not remotely like anything ever seen before – at least the colours used in the picture must be real. Similarly, although these general kinds of things – eyes, head, hands and so on – could be imaginary, there is no denying that certain even simpler and more universal kinds of things are real. These are the elements out of which we make all our mental images of things – the true and also the false ones.
These simpler and more universal kinds include body, and extension; the shape of extended things; their quantity, size and number; the places things can be in, the time through which they can last, and so on.
So it seems reasonable to conclude that physics, astronomy, medicine, and all other sciences dealing with things that have complex structures are doubtful; while arithmetic, geometry and other studies of the simplest and most general things – whether they really exist in nature or not – contain something certain and indubitable. For whether I am awake or asleep, two plus three makes five, and a square has only four sides. It seems impossible to suspect that such obvious truths might be false.
However, I have for many years been sure that there is an all-powerful God who made me to be the sort of creature that I am. How do I know that he hasn’t brought it about that there is no earth, no sky, nothing that takes up space, no shape, no size, no place, while making sure that all these things appear to me to exist? Anyway, I sometimes think that others go wrong even when they think they have the most perfect knowledge; so how do I know that I myself don’t go wrong every time I add two and three or count the sides of a square? Well, you might say·, God would not let me be deceived like that, because he is said to be supremely good. But, I reply, if God’s goodness would stop him from letting me be deceived all the time, you would expect it to stop him from allowing me to be deceived even occasionally; yet clearly I sometimes am deceived.
Some people would deny the existence of such a powerful God rather than believe that everything else is uncertain. Let us grant them – for purposes of argument – that there is no God, and theology is fiction. On their view, then, I am a product of fate or chance or a long chain of causes and effects. But the less powerful they make my original cause, the more likely it is that I am so imperfect as to be deceived all the time – because deception and error seem to be imperfections. Having no answer to these arguments, I am driven back to the position that doubts can properly be raised about any of my former beliefs. I don’t reach this conclusion in a flippant or casual manner, but on the basis of powerful and well thought-out reasons. So in future, if I want to discover any certainty, I must withhold my assent from these former beliefs just as carefully as I withhold it from obvious falsehoods.
It isn’t enough merely to have noticed this, though; I must make an effort to remember it. My old familiar opinions keep coming back, and against my will they capture my belief. It is as though they had a right to a place in my belief-system as a result of long occupation and the law of custom. It is true that these habitual opinions of mine are highly probable; although they are in a sense doubtful, as I have shown, it is more reasonable to believe than to deny them. But if I go on viewing them in that light I shall never get out of the habit of confidently assenting to them. To conquer that habit, therefore, I had better switch right around and pretend (for a while) that these former opinions of mine are utterly false and imaginary. I shall do this until I have something to counter-balance the weight of old opinion, and the distorting influence of habit no longer prevents me from judging correctly. However far I go in my distrustful attitude, no actual harm will come of it, because my project won’t affect how I act, but only how I go about acquiring knowledge.
So I shall suppose that some malicious, powerful, cunning demon has done all he can to deceive me – rather than this being done by God, who is supremely good and the source of truth. I shall think that the sky, the air, the earth, colours, shapes, sounds and all external things are merely dreams that the demon has contrived as traps for my judgment. I shall consider myself as having no hands or eyes, or flesh, or blood or senses, but as having falsely believed that I had all these things. I shall stubbornly persist in this train of thought; and even if I can’t learn any truth, I shall at least do what I can do, which is to be on my guard against accepting any falsehoods, so that the deceiver – however powerful and cunning he may be – will be unable to affect me in the slightest. This will be hard work, though, and a kind of laziness pulls me back into my old ways.
Like a prisoner who dreams that he is free, starts to suspect that it is merely a dream, and wants to go on dreaming rather than waking up, so I am content to slide back into my old opinions; I fear being shaken out of them because I am afraid that my peaceful sleep may be followed by hard labour when I wake, and that I shall have to struggle not in the light but in the imprisoning darkness of the problems I have raised. Then I started LIVING LA VIDA LOCA.
GilaShot · · Western Antarctic, New Engl… · Joined Jun 2014 · Points: 0

Rant about how proper rope management eliminates the need for a helmet all you want, the fact remains that there is one reason and one reason only people don't wear helmets. They don't think it looks cool. Sorry, but that's it. And guess what? You shouldn't worry so much about what people think of you, because they don't as much as you think.

I follow a motorcycling forum which the same debate always ongoing. Next time you're in a state with no helmet laws have a look at the riders. Harley riders generally want to look cool and fit in with the rest of the Harley guys, so they won't wear a helmet. The geeks on the BMW's and Triumph's don't care, so they wear a helmet like anybody with a brain worth protecting would do.

Same same with climbing.

M Mobley · · Bar Harbor, ME · Joined Mar 2006 · Points: 911

Proper rope management is a farce, when going for it on a regular basis one really never knows what lies ahead. You can minimize the risk for sure but you will never eliminate it. Thats why I wear mine when either 1- at the Gunks(even on the road) or 2- actually going for it.

Anonymous · · Unknown Hometown · Joined unknown · Points: 0
GilaShot wrote:Rant about how proper rope management eliminates the need for a helmet all you want, the fact remains that there is one reason and one reason only people don't wear helmets. They don't think it looks cool. Sorry, but that's it. And guess what? You shouldn't worry so much about what people think of you, because they don't as much as you think. I follow a motorcycling forum which the same debate always ongoing. Next time you're in a state with no helmet laws have a look at the riders. Harley riders generally want to look cool and fit in with the rest of the Harley guys, so they won't wear a helmet. The geeks on the BMW's and Triumph's don't care, so they wear a helmet like anybody with a brain worth protecting would do. Same same with climbing.
I would say alot more people don't wear them because they are uncomfortable or get in the way more than what they look like. I am sure there are some who would not wear them for looks but alot more find them just uncomfortable.
Old lady H · · Boise, ID · Joined Aug 2015 · Points: 1,374
GilaShot wrote:Rant about how proper rope management eliminates the need for a helmet all you want, the fact remains that there is one reason and one reason only people don't wear helmets. They don't think it looks cool. Sorry, but that's it. And guess what? You shouldn't worry so much about what people think of you, because they don't as much as you think. I follow a motorcycling forum which the same debate always ongoing. Next time you're in a state with no helmet laws have a look at the riders. Harley riders generally want to look cool and fit in with the rest of the Harley guys, so they won't wear a helmet. The geeks on the BMW's and Triumph's don't care, so they wear a helmet like anybody with a brain worth protecting would do. Same same with climbing.
This is some what true, but it's more interesting than that.

BITD, there were no bike helmets, or even seatbelts in cars. Motorcycle helmet laws were being argued for the first time. One of the main arguments against mandatory helmets, was the personal choice only involved that rider. A big part of that choice was knowing that helmets didn't protect against spinal injuries, back injuries, etc., and it was openly expressed by many that they would rather just die in a crash than risk being a "vegetable".

Bike helmets got going with BMX stuff, probably, but it's still pretty hit and miss if people wear them.

Climbing helmets can be hot, and bulky to haul around. I take the word of those who say they use them selectively, but in everyday practice, I suspect most either wear it pretty much every time, or essentially not at all.

I've only been climbing a couple years, and, thinking back, when we first started, we were often the only ones with helmets at our local crag. Still a minority wear them, but it is tipping.

I don't think it's a "look cool" thing, I think it's a "don't be different" thing. Climbing parties of two? Both often have helmets. Six or eight? Maybe one. Maybe.

Helmets are just helmets. They will protect against trips to the ER for stitches, painful, but not fatal whacks to the head, random oddities that fall from above, and, maybe, might save your life within extremely narrow parameters. They are not magic, and you do not need a massive whipper to defeat them. Plenty of bodies have been bagged with helmets on their heads.

I don't expect mine to routinely save my life. But I also don't want the indignity of being taken out by a dinky little rock coming off the top of the cliff.
JK- Branin · · NYC-ish · Joined Nov 2012 · Points: 56
ViperScale wrote: I would say alot more people don't wear them because they are uncomfortable or get in the way more than what they look like. I am sure there are some who would not wear them for looks but alot more find them just uncomfortable.
There is a massive variety of helmets available these days. Backcountry alone gave me 35 results. If it is too uncomfortable to wear, chances are people are it is the wrong helmet for the head... As for gets in the way: offwidthds sure. Anywhere else? Not so much.

Note: I'm not telling you or anyone else to wear, or not wear a helmet. There is far to much of that already both ways on this thread.

Second note: Every week(end) when I get to work and this thread is still going a little part of me lets out a deep sigh.
Anonymous · · Unknown Hometown · Joined unknown · Points: 0
JK- wrote: There is a massive variety of helmets available these days. Backcountry alone gave me 35 results. If it is too uncomfortable to wear, chances are people are it is the wrong helmet for the head... As for gets in the way: offwidthds sure. Anywhere else? Not so much. Note: I'm not telling you or anyone else to wear, or not wear a helmet. There is far to much of that already both ways on this thread. Second note: Every week(end) when I get to work and this thread is still going a little part of me lets out a deep sigh.
You may understand what I mean when I saw uncomfortable. Anything on my head I do not like, there is no such thing as something I can put on and find comfortable. I also don't like wearing any type of sunglasses etc, anything on my glass annoys the heck out of me.

I also don't like shoes and spend most of my time barefoot only putting something on my feet when I really have to. (I even climb barefoot most of the time when not leading)
Brandon.Phillips · · Portola, CA · Joined May 2011 · Points: 55

The worst mistake I ever made was clicking "notify me at the top of web site" to this thread.

JK- Branin · · NYC-ish · Joined Nov 2012 · Points: 56
ViperScale wrote: You may understand what I mean when I saw uncomfortable. Anything on my head I do not like, there is no such thing as something I can put on and find comfortable.
Fair enough. I get that. I can't stand hats. For some reason helmets don't bother me (some helmets... others are hell on earth...).

ViperScale wrote: anything on my glass annoys the heck out of me.

So much yes.

ViperScale wrote: I also don't like shoes and spend most of my time barefoot only putting something on my feet when I really have to. (I even climb barefoot most of the time when not leading)
This I don't get... But to each their own.
Alex Bury · · Ojai, CA · Joined Jun 2012 · Points: 2,376
Brandon.Phillips wrote:The worst mistake I ever made was clicking "notify me at the top of web site" to this thread.
Then you are doing quite well in life.
Forthright · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Oct 2011 · Points: 110
Brandon.Phillips wrote:The worst mistake I ever made was clicking "notify me at the top of web site" to this thread.
+1
Helen L · · Toronto, CA · Joined Sep 2016 · Points: 341

Although I am in the "wear a helmet" camp, this is an interesting perspective (although about bike helmets.. though I am in the "wear a helmet" camp with cycling too):

howiechong.com/journal/2014…

M Mobley · · Bar Harbor, ME · Joined Mar 2006 · Points: 911
HelenL wrote:Although I am in the "wear a helmet" camp, this is an interesting perspective (although about bike helmets.. though I am in the "wear a helmet" camp with cycling too): howiechong.com/journal/2014…
This guy is a nutcase for riding without a helmet in New Haven CT, its a city without traffic enforcement where a high percentage of drivers are not legal in any way. Most Yalies wear blinders to the dangers of the New Haven streets.
Guy Keesee · · Moorpark, CA · Joined Mar 2008 · Points: 349
GilaShot wrote:Rant about how proper rope management eliminates the need for a helmet all you want, the fact remains that there is one reason and one reason only people don't wear helmets. They don't think it looks cool. Sorry, but that's it. ........
Gila.... your wrong. I don't use one because it messes up my hair.
Alex Bury · · Ojai, CA · Joined Jun 2012 · Points: 2,376
GilaShot wrote:Rant about how proper rope management eliminates the need for a helmet all you want, the fact remains that there is one reason and one reason only people don't wear helmets. They don't think it looks cool. Sorry, but that's it. And guess what? You shouldn't worry so much about what people think of you, because they don't as much as you think. I follow a motorcycling forum which the same debate always ongoing. Next time you're in a state with no helmet laws have a look at the riders. Harley riders generally want to look cool and fit in with the rest of the Harley guys, so they won't wear a helmet. The geeks on the BMW's and Triumph's don't care, so they wear a helmet like anybody with a brain worth protecting would do. Same same with climbing.
I used to use the same argument promoting helmet use. Basically 'the only reason not to wear
one is to look cool'. But I've since reevaluated the issue and no longer believe it's that simple.

It's more about how wearing a helmet makes a person feel, than how it makes them look. Climbing is a proud endeavor, and helmet use flies in the face of much of it. At least traditionally...times are a changin'.
Ball · · Oakridge, OR · Joined Jan 2010 · Points: 70

Always

youtube.com/watch?v=lVN_hQP…

I used to climb without one, but got weary of being pelted on the head with rocks. Even hanging out below the cliff is dangerous. Was hanging out at a crag in Zion and a huge mortar hit the ground in the middle of the group causing everyone to scramble for their helmets!

don'tchuffonme · · Unknown Hometown · Joined Jan 2014 · Points: 26
Ball wrote: Was hanging out at a crag in Zion and a huge mortar hit the ground in the middle of the group causing everyone to scramble for their helmets!
Zion, Afghanistan?

Guideline #1: Don't be a jerk.

General Climbing
Post a Reply to "Helmets"

Log In to Reply
Welcome

Join the Community

Create your FREE account today!
Already have an account? Login to close this notice.

Get Started