Near miss at the Gunks
|
climbing friend, |
|
rgold wrote: No---they weren't sure if the rope would reach. You even quoted it! Whether or not it turns out, after the fact, that it does reach is irrelevant. Sending the newbie down first in the dark on a rappel that might not reach the ground would have been plum loco. But beyond that, you don't let a novice rappeller go first, especially in stressful situations, unless you can belay them as they rap. A 70 m rap would probably have hung up all over the place. The first person down would have to stop, untangle things, and re-toss the rope, probably more than once. In the dark especially, they might rap past a hangup and not be able to clear it from underneath. Then they have to ascend the rope or else they are stuck. If the rope has hung in a tree and the catchpoint is significantly out from the cliff face, you have a difficult and possibly quite dangerous situation even for an experienced person. Or maybe rope does clear and brings rocks or a branch down on the rappeller with it. Putting a newbie in such situations would be extremely negligent. Add to this the fact that they are doing a single-strand rappel (did they remember to double the biners? If so, did doubled biners turn out to provide enough friction for the single strand in question? If not, how does the newbie get more friction once they're part way down the rappel?) Now IF you knew for certain that the rope reached the ground---which the party in question did not---then you might consider lowering the newbie to the ground as a pretty safe option.It's a pretty simple solution from my perspective. You send Jack down first on the doubled 60m rope to the first rap station. He ties the 70m rope into the doubled 60m at the rappel station and raps to the ground. On the ground he looks for the center mark of the 70m rope and if it is on the ground he has his partners pull up both the 60m and 70m and sends the newbie down on the single 70m. No tangled 70m rope and there are experienced climbers at both ends of the rappel. If the middle mark of the 70m isn't on the ground, the remaining two climbers come down to the first rappel station(knot/biners joining the doubled 60m to the single 70m strand act as a safety) and pull down the 60m and pull up the 70m and do a double rope rappel to the ground. |
|
Bill Kirby wrote: From the top of CCK its three single raps to the ground via last to be first. It's in the guidebook. So I think a 70M single rap wouldn't make it. I see where you're coming from since one 30m rap and 35 rap gone them to the ground. Maybe this whole thing started after the first rap? I'm missing something? I was hoping either the OP or someone else would elaborate.Bill, yes, you are missing something. They weren't rapping CCK. They were rapping Last Will be First. |
|
Bruce Hildenbrand wrote: Bill, yes, you are missing something. They weren't rapping CCK. They were rapping Last Will be First.I wrote they were rapping from Last will be first in what you quoted!!!!!!! Go back and read what you quoted!!!!! Jeez.. I'm glad Dave and rockandice hit me off with an answer. |
|
rgold wrote: Untying the rappel knots on "Ashley's" rope is almost criminally negligent.At the risk of getting flamed, I'm going to say that I often untie the knots in the end of the rope when I am the first one down, if the ropes comfortably reach the next ledge/stance. I do make it a point to say something and I hang out there until the next guy gets down. I do this for several reasons. #1, if the rope comfortably reaches the ledge and I am there, there is no way they will overshoot and no way they can go off the end of the ropes. #2 less chance of ever pulling the ropes with the knots still in it. #3 Often I start threading one end through the next anchor so that then when we pull it, it is already threaded. The issue is not so much untying the knots, but the not saying anything and leaving which left everyone else the impression that the knots were still there. Just goes to show that you should not become complacent and rely on the knots and still need to pay attention to where you are going. And as rgold correctly pointed out, when you are with beginners you need to take extra precautions. I used to know a guide who always said "Pretend like your clients were hired by your ex wife to kill you and make it look like an accident." They can and will do anything and everything possible to screw up. Even things you hadn't even thought of. You need to bring your A game and give them as little chance to screw up as possible. |
|
rocknice2 wrote:I think they split the raps from the GT ledge. They all arrived at the GT ledge together and with extra rope in hand Jack rappelled on a folder single rope to the mid station. Then from there to the ground on another folded rope. If Ashley has missed the GT ledge (highly unlikely) the next rap would need to be a full length single strand. It would have been impossible to fix that next rap as a double strand. Therefore the rope would have been fixed with everyone at the bottom. I believe she missed the station half way down from the GT ledge.I agree, since Medic wrote something that everyone seems to have missed: "...I mis-stated this. We did a total of 3 raps from the top; the first to the GT ledge and it was rapping off the LWBF GT ledge anchor that this occurred." In any case, Medic, thanks for posting this. I'd climb with you or "Ashley". Not so sure about "Jack". Untying the knots and leaving "Ashley" to be alone in the dark at a rap station is pretty unforgivable. Especially after: "He was expected to give a firemans belay, this was discussed before we started rapping and he said 'no problem.' " |
|
Yes it is quite clear where this happened now-- if you know the area. |
|
Michael Schneider |
|
SethG wrote:...it might benefit us all to be a little less smug...Agreed, I tried to say the same thing earlier. SethG wrote:...I think the most important lesson here is that if you let yourself get benighted on a route, with people of mixed experience, then you may be asking for trouble.Sadly, I think the exact same thing might have happened to this party in broad daylight. I think the essential lesson, which has to do with misplaced expectations of inexperienced people, lies elsewhere. Bruce Hildenbrand wrote: It's a pretty simple solution from my perspective...Now you are Monday morning quarterbacking your own answer---you didn't say anything about these rope shenanigans before. As a general rule, I think it is a bad idea to substitute one-of-a kind-procedures with their own poorly-understood failure modes for safe and effective standard protocols. Although, as it turns out, the distances don't add up to this on LWBF, your proposal in principle could put the climber at the bottom 100m from the people at the top, in a situation in which communication is critical. And the newly-concocted method still condemns a novice rappeller to a long single-strand rappel that could go badly if they aren't set up properly for it and don't know how to add friction in mid-rappel if their set-up isn't adequate, so lowering should probably have been substituted for rappelling here. There may be times when creative solutions are necessary, but in the situation discussed here, all that was needed was to follow tried-and-true protocols. Learn the basics and do 'em right when things get stressful, and don't go re-inventing the wheel unless you absolutely have to. |
|
Bill Kirby wrote: I wrote they were rapping from Last will be first in what you quoted!!!!!!! Go back and read what you quoted!!!!! Jeez.. I'm glad Dave and rockandice hit me off with an answer.Oops! My bad! |
|
Having read this I've picked up a few things I missed from my own analysis of what went wrong:
This is a conversation that would have avoided our misunderstanding of our dynamic leading to this incident. I now strongly believe this conversation is worth having with any group of climbers and will lead to a more 'highly functioning' team: a) what the role of each climber is b) As a group designate authority to who can modify a safety system and who can make autonomous decisions. It's kind of like having a 'safety officer' on a scene. d) how are decisions made, who makes them, make sure the 'team' understands this. take-away: Jack felt he was autonomous in our group and an 'equal' to myself as a leader and thus felt comfortable modifying a system that I had placed. If he had understood his role and I had made clear that he did not have the designated 'authority' to make the decisions he made I would have maintained the ability to safely manage this group. Rgold, that's a really good point stressing the complexities of group dynamics. On the way home I was talking with my regular partner who I can, actually (haha), trust with my life about how we communicate and manage our own dynamics he said something that really 'made sense to me.' So, looking at how I climb when I'm climbing hard (for me) with my regular partner there are a few things that make us work really well that are a different mindset from Jack that contributed to these mistakes: 'game face' mentality doesn't change until you're back on the ground and the rap ropes have been successfully pulled. I do NOT celebrate on a summit or relax and have a conversation, it breaks my concentration and lose my edge on the way down. The celebration seems to give people a false sense of 'it's over' and 'I'm safe.' Obviously more important in Patagonia than it is in the Gunks, but I use that mindset on any climb (and I'm getting ready to get flamed for being no fun for saying that haha). My regular partner shares this mindset and it keeps both of us on our game. By agreeing and discussing this as a norm I think this has helped keep us very safe as a team, especially when it gets weird on the way down. If I mentally 'celebrated' with them when we were at the top I probably wouldn't have had the 'edge' to problem solve during this emergency.
Recognizing this I will include a conversation about continuing a 'game face' mentality until the party is on the ground when I'm with someone I don't have 100% confidence in. If you've got your shit together, freed the nose, insert impressive thing here, and it's just you and me climbing together; that's a different story. So +1 for group dynamics. Good observation rgold. |
|
Stagg54 wrote: At the risk of getting flamed, I'm going to say that I often untie the knots in the end of the rope when I am the first one down, if the ropes comfortably reach the next ledge/stance. I do make it a point to say something and I hang out there until the next guy gets down. I do this for several reasons. #1, if the rope comfortably reaches the ledge and I am there, there is no way they will overshoot and no way they can go off the end of the ropes. #2 less chance of ever pulling the ropes with the knots still in it. #3 Often I start threading one end through the next anchor so that then when we pull it, it is already threaded. The issue is not so much untying the knots, but the not saying anything and leaving which left everyone else the impression that the knots were still there. Just goes to show that you should not become complacent and rely on the knots and still need to pay attention to where you are going. And as rgold correctly pointed out, when you are with beginners you need to take extra precautions. I used to know a guide who always said "Pretend like your clients were hired by your ex wife to kill you and make it look like an accident." They can and will do anything and everything possible to screw up. Even things you hadn't even thought of. You need to bring your A game and give them as little chance to screw up as possible.Haha I hope after reading this it might change your practice! Here's an idea for an alternative: 1) arrive first at station 2) anchor with a tether and weight the tether to test it 3) pull slack through ATC, keeping device on the rope, so that next climber can rap this way if the follower loses control the rope is right in front of you to pull down for a firemans. You are paying attention to your partner, right? ;) 4) with ATC still in system untie safety knots in rap ropes and thread through next set of rings 5) second climber arrives without risking rapping off ends in a worst case scenario Or just leave the knots in, but you want your system to always be set up for that worst case scenario |
|
Aleks Zebastian wrote:climbing friend, how do you call the one who shepherds the noob, and can utilize the patience to calm them down and make them think rational on dark and scary belay ledge of multiple pitch? the noob whisperer?myah that made my day. |
|
Stagg54 wrote: At the risk of getting flamed, I'm going to say that I often untie the knots in the end of the rope when I am the first one down, if the ropes comfortably reach the next ledge/stance.Please don't ever climb with me. The knots are there to keep an unanticipated event from leading to death. In your scenario, a chunk of falling ice or rock, a freak lightning strike, an ischemic or anaphylactic event, anything like that could cause the rapper to whiz down the rope, past you on your "obvious" ledge. |
|
Gunkiemike wrote: Please don't ever climb with me. The knots are there to keep an unanticipated event from leading to death. In your scenario, a chunk of falling ice or rock, a freak lightning strike, an ischemic or anaphylactic event, anything like that could cause the rapper to whiz down the rope, past you on your "obvious" ledge.Thank You, as one who can talk directly to this issue, I think your restraint till now is a show of professionalism, that maybe misplaced. The Op , medic741, is 23 ? He is in the upward curve of the learning curve, & as a newer climber himself, ,( just a few months ago asking where to go to practice rappelling ?) He should -not be - climbing past dusk. Starting up, without knowing how long the raps are, Taking responsibility for less experienced or novice Climbers, Among other things He should spend the time & money to hire you , GunkieMike , or a guide of equal skill. |
|
Michael Schneider wrote: The Op , medic741, is 23 ? He is in the upward curve of the learning curve, & as a newer climber himself, ,( just a few months ago asking where to go to practice rappelling ?) He should -not be - climbing past dusk. Starting up, without knowing how long the raps are, Taking responsibility for less experienced or novice Climbers, Among other things He should spend the time & money to hire you , GunkieMike , or a guide of equal skill.Mike, why is it for you to be so hard on Matt? To be reading this forum makes Matt sound pretty much doing good work and taking the feedback very well. Is 23 too much young to climb "after dusk" from the opinion you have? Gosh, I know many young climbers that are very much rock solid on safety and self rescue in many diverse climbing environments. And you maybe read too much into who Matt is by looking at the Medic741 info here on this Mountain Project. Send some love to his way, it feels better. |
|
i must Say I |
|
I either leave my device on the rope or throw a Munter hitch on a carabiner on the belay loop. That way you can sit down on the rap rope to apply the fireman's belay rather than pulling with your hands, and yes you keep control of the strands. |
|
I appreciate the tip, thanks rgold. |
|
lot of yapping |