most expensive climber's campground?
|
the Gunks campground charges $38 per night (or $24 for members of Mohonk Preserve or AAC.) |
|
Per campground? Per vehicle? Per dirtbag? Keepin the riffraff out so only white collar climbers can go there? |
|
Malibu creek is $45 a night for a tent site. |
|
The "high" cost for non-AAC/Mohonk folks is to maximize camping spaces for the climbing community by encouraging non-climbers to find camping elsewhere. |
|
|
|
richard aiken wrote:the Gunks campground charges $38 per night (or $24 for members of Mohonk Preserve or AAC.) Is there any other place in the US which is that expensive or more? Seems to me that aside from free places, $10 per night or so is more normal. Just curious.$24 for 4 people doesn't seem too $$$. Within a few miles of the AAC CG is Jellystone. $60 for 2 people there. Acadia National Park (and I bet all the others) are $30 per site (up to 6 people). I challenge you to name other campgrounds that are < $6 per person pernight. three are some but not many. |
|
Eric Engberg wrote: $24 for 4 people doesn't seem too $$$. Within a few miles of the AAC CG is Jellystone. $60 for 2 people there. Acadia National Park (and I bet all the others) are $30 per site (up to 6 people). I challenge you to name other campgrounds that are < $6 per person pernight. three are some but not many.Smith Rock |
|
vgw wrote: Smith RockI second smith rock, bivouac is $5/night, skull hollow is the same, and if you want just a wee bit past skull hollow blm land is free |
|
Shelf Road is only $7 per site I believe. Not sure the person limit but it's not less than 4. |
|
1. Orenda, New York |
|
Just dropped $20 to camp in NH White Mountains. Nice enough, but all you get is water, a pit toilet, and a patch of gravel amidst the pines. |
|
Princess snowbird in Seneca. $6 per person :) |
|
Many of the "camp sites" that Marc801 mentioned are in a completely different category. First off, they offer services far beyond what any of the aforementioned climber camp grounds provide, such as inclusive meals and transportation services. While I think a general knowledge and awareness of these types of institutions can be beneficial for perspective for climbers, I still don't think it relinquishes the AAC from being fairly criticized for building a "climbers' campground" that is financially prohibitive for a large percentage of climbers. |
|
Eric Engberg wrote: $24 for 4 people doesn't seem too $$$. Within a few miles of the AAC CG is Jellystone. $60 for 2 people there. Acadia National Park (and I bet all the others) are $30 per site (up to 6 people). I challenge you to name other campgrounds that are < $6 per person pernight. three are some but not many.The lilly pad is $5 per person a night. |
|
Nolan Huther wrote:Miguel's Pizza in RRG - $2 per night per tent. Not expensive at all, spend the money you'd usually use for camping on pizzaYes, and the reason Miguel's can keep their costs down so much is because of the pizza. (rant ahead) The bottom line is that, unless you've got a deal like Miguel's (or the several "adventure resorts" in WV near where I live that offer restaurants, rafting, etc. in addition to camping) where another service subsidizes camping, or where your land is already paid for, a campground is a terrible investment. The AAC actually struggles to break even on every one of its properties, despite numerous complaints about pricing. If you do the simple math, factoring in things like bad weather, mid-week lulls, and capacity caps on full weekends, you'll see that campgrounds do not make that much money. When I managed the AAC's place at the New River Gorge, complaints were common about having to pay $8-12/night, often from climbers pulling brand new racks out of brand new cars. No one stopped to think about the fact that the AAC has sunk over three quarters of a million dollars into the campground that it will NEVER recover in the next 50 years, and that the fees are calculated just to pay utilities, maintenance, insurance, and managers' wages. Most climbers and campers have a sort of entitled attitude that sleeping outside is some sort of off-the-grid, anti-consumeristic wilderness exercise that should be completely free. And yeah, some (but definitely not all) state and national parks can be a bit cheaper, but ultimately, you've got to pay for what you're getting. |
|
Nick Goldsmith wrote:Princess snowbird in Seneca. $6 per person :)You're livin in the past Nick. I think it's up to $7. |
|
Pnelson wrote: (rant ahead)your rant changed my mind about campground fees |
|
JohnnyG wrote: your rant changed my mind about campground fees... said nobody on the internet, EVER. |
|
has anyone stayed at any of the places on marc's list? Those look like my dream wedding venues. |
|
I thought the Teton ranch was not bad for the price - a year ago we paid $25 a night so $50 for both of us as we are not AAC members. Anyway, not only are there the amenities, but having those in such a wonderful location is really great. |
|
Pnelson wrote:No one stopped to think about the fact that the AAC has sunk over three quarters of a million dollars into the campground that it will NEVER recover in the next 50 years, and that the fees are calculated just to pay utilities, maintenance, insurance, and managers' wages. Most climbers and campers have a sort of entitled attitude that sleeping outside is some sort of off-the-grid, anti-consumeristic wilderness exercise that should be completely free. And yeah, some (but definitely not all) state and national parks can be a bit cheaper, but ultimately, you've got to pay for what you're getting.What's more, land where the Gunks AAC CG is located is currently around $25K per acre. Regarding the sense of entitlement, a lot of climber also conveniently forget that for most of them at most climbing areas, they are tourists just as much as the tourists they so eagerly denigrate. |