Beaks vs. KB
|
Hey, |
|
Zach. Yes horizontal could start as a good benefit then- amount of contanct/friction,depth,more sizes,ability to stack, strength, ease of removel! (Less damage to the stone) I'm sure there is more benefits. So much tar on the brain! Anyone ?help? |
|
i barely carry any KBs when wallin', beaks have pretty much replaced em for me. yes i use them for stacking occasionally and in horizontals for sure, but i mean i cant imagine carrying more than a single set of smaller KBs and maybe 1 big one for horizontals. though im only maybe 20-30 walls deep so im not as crusty as some of those hardmen who've been doing it forever |
|
If you had 8 LA's and 6 KB's you would have enough to get up quite few routes. We used just about that many on Genesis recently and probably not more than that on Reticent. On each one of those routes we had 5 or 6 each of Pecker though.
On Genesis, we used Peckers driven up into horizontal overlaps Pecker in an overlap. |
|
You can see that this Pecker is in a crack that is bordered on it's right by a small flake. The flake was totally hollow sounding but it was the only placement available. The fall wouldn't have been bad but I'm a chicken and felt that tying off the blade would lessen any torque on it and the flake. |
|
I can't believe either of the peckers in Mark's photos above held! |
|
Blades are good after you have exhausted your 30 beak rack and still have 30 feet left to the belay. |
|
Peckers/Beaks/Tomahawks are all cheating - they make everything A1-. |