Julian Smith wrote:Dave Kesonie, Thank you for taking the time to call me out on this. So, I followed your advice and have now posted a much more abbreviated description. Hope you like it. Julian Smith
Dare I micromanage your new description?
I see you have edited some, but here is what I was thinking:
-the God part is inappropriate
-don't hem and haw about whether the climber may want a rope or not. Just say "follow a 4th class ridge for 1000 feet" or "follow 3rd class ledges" or "go up a step (easy fifth class)" so that the reader doesn't have to interpret what your idea of "easy climbing" is.
I think the rest is okay/good:
-the photo is killer
-breaking it into four sections is a good idea
-noting landmarks such as well-used rap slings is good
-telling the condition of the crux pins was good
-interpreting the Ortenberger/jackson "bowl" was good info
I guess I gotta post up some routes since I'm being so damn nitpicky!