In defense of projects.
|
The "Desperately Seeking 8a" thread got me thinking. There seems to be a lot of anti-longterm-project sentiment out there. I, myself, have run into it at the crag, people who are obsessed with sending routes quickly, in a handful of goes. I think it's worthwhile to note, however, that nobody ever made a climbing video about a climber who sent his route in three goes. People generally aren't interested in watching climbers climbing things within their limit, but many climbers seem to fall into the trap of sending things quickly. |
|
I think spending time with a project is like spending time with a part of you. When projecting you get to the point where you know a route like the back of your hand--you've got the moves you like, the moves that piss you off and challenge you, and of course the point you're stuck at. It took me a long time to get to the point where I liked working on a project. It's a personal victory for me when I finally send something that I've been trying for weeks--something that my friends still don't understand. Speaking of which can definitely have adverse effects--having a buddy on belay that is sick of watching you fall on the same move, hang, chalk up, rinse and repeat.... is annoying to me because I feel like I'm hogging their time. That's why I feel it's important to have people that value working a project. If you have someone with you that just wants to send everything in a couple of goes--it takes away from the experiance. |
|
Like anything in life, you get back what you give. |
|
Five years ago, I had just sent my hardest route at the time, in five tries, and I ran across a local hero at the crag. We were talking about routes and I asked him which route was his first 5.14. He told me it was Supernova at Rumney. Then I asked him how many tries it took him and he said, "Oh, I don't know. I guess about seventy." |
|
Bob D'Antonio wrote:I'm way too type A to last more than a few days on a project.I don't understand... |
|
I started climbing with people who were anti projecting, and encouraged climbing until you fell (on well protected climbs). So I have never done much projecting the most I have ever tried a route has been 5 goes. In fact my general strategy to trying hard routes has been exactly what Monomaniac recommends against. Monomaniac wrote: One problem folks have with projecting is that they try for the on-sight first, then they get severely pumped, so their next burn is worse than the first, and so on, until they declare the objective 'impossible'. Don't do this. Go bolt to bolt until you've sent a few of them.However this has made me a really good onsight climber (or a really bad redpoint climber) depending how you look at it. As my best onsight grade is within 1-2 letters of my best redpoint grade. This season I'm hoping to use good projecting strategy and elevating my climbing to the "mythical" 8a level. However I still think that quick sends are still better for advancing your climbing than working a route to death. I believe the Self Coached Climber recommends picking max projects that will take around 8 attempts. One project I really remember is Mad Hatter a 110 ft endurance route because of the awful strategy I used on it. 1st go I tried to flash it, 1 fall at the top. 2nd go I was tired couldn't remember the moves and fell several times. 3rd go I fell at the second bolt and proceeded to send the rest of it hanging the draws. 4th go couldn't find a hold and fell towards the top. 5th go, on the third day of trying Redpoint! While this route was very memorable for me because of the frustration of 1 falling it 3 times, I probably could have sent 2nd go with better strategy. Another project was The Demon a 50 ft Power Endurance route. On this route the moves were so hard for me that I had to work them just to get up the route. After 2 goes I had the moves memorized, I could go through all the moves (21 of them) through the business section while sitting at work. I was able to send on my 3rd go. I found it very cool to be able to remember all the moves and flow through the route. |
|
"I think it's worthwhile to note, however, that nobody ever made a climbing video about a climber who sent his route in three goes. People generally aren't interested in watching climbers climbing things within their limit" |
|
adam brink wrote: I've done it enough to know that it takes less mental control, less fitness and less strength than doing a route on-sight or in a couple tries.What were you projecting? I think I need to try whatever route you're talking about! mental control? how about the mental control to get on a route for the fiftieth time and know that failure is more than a real possiblilty again, and still try your hardest. This may not be the same type of mental control required to climb on runout terrain, but it is not any less difficult to attain. less fitness, less strength? then how come I've got to train so hard to get a new letter grade every other year, or every three years? I think that each discipline of climbing requires these attributes in differing forms. |
|
adam brink wrote: "I think it's worthwhile to note, however, that nobody ever made a climbing video about a climber who sent his route in three goes. People generally aren't interested in watching climbers climbing things within their limit" No offense but... you can't really be serious, are you? First, who cares what kind of climbing other people want to watch (unless you are Peter Mortemer, of course)? Second, some of the very best climbing videos I've ever seen where based around quick ascents. Cameron trying to on-sight The Evictor, Peter Croft on-sight soloing in the Sierras and what is probably the best piece of climbing footage ever, the opening of Hard Grit with Jean-Min trying to on-sight Gia.Adam, you are talking about onsighting, not projecting. I did not say that onsights are not worthy. Each situation that you mentioned highlights a climber climbing at his limit (and beyond his limit, in the case of Gaia). My original questions dealt with projecting and said nothing of onsighting. adam brink wrote: Projecting is great if you are trying to push into that next level. It's great if you want to climb something that is really hard. It's great if you want to fluff you're 8a scorecard. BUT... if you really want to see how good you are, how strong and fit you are, then go out and do that hard route with no toprope practice, no dogging the line for hours and in as few tries as possible. Then you'll find out how good, fit and strong you are. With all that said, I project plenty. I've done it enough to know that it takes less mental control, less fitness and less strength than doing a route on-sight or in a couple tries.Please spare me the "you'll find out how good, fit and strong you are" garbage. There are many of us who enjoy projecting and there are many of us who enjoy onsighting. One is not better than the other, nor does one wholly determine climbing prowess. I happen to love projecting. I don't do it to "fluff my scorecard" or to prove anything to anyone. It sounds to me like you are trying to prove something here. |
|
Wow! That didn't take too much. I obviously touched a nerve. |
|
adam brink wrote:Like I said, I've projectd plenty. There's nothing wrong with it. I just don't think that it requirs as much ability as hard on-sighting and quick repeats.This was exactly the point of the thread. Many people attribute less worth to long-term projects. I disagree. It takes serious mental fortitude to tie in for that 70th redpoint burn, knowing that it's very likely that you will fall. When I think of the big routes in sport climbing history, each was a long-term, toilsome, and I would argue difficult project: Just Do It, Super Tweek, Action Directe, Realization, etc. Some trad climbs were serious projects too: Cobra Crack is a great example. Are you going to say that the effort that went into that is any less than the effort that goes into trad onsights? |
|
the "desperately seeking 8a" thread was my lurking asses favorite in a long time! it, along with this one and unlike so many others, seem to exploit, for me, what this site is supposed to be about. |
|
Bob D'Antonio wrote:I'm way too type A to last more than a few days on a project.From the looks of some of your FAs, Bob, I think it would take the rest of us more than a few days to repeat them. |
|
scott e. tarrant wrote:the "desperately seeking 8a" thread was my lurking asses favorite in a long time! it, along with this one and unlike so many others, seem to exploit, for me, what this site is supposed to be about. after many years of climbing, i feel foolish appearing the super neophyte but...i have never projected. would love to try. i am sure there are dozens of symptoms at play regarding the reasons why i have/have not (fill in the blank) and those are just plain boring. please share more regarding strategy, route choices, etc. i have climbed in and around 5.12 for many years, on-sighted 5.12b (probably a soft rating), red pointed (3rd try) 12c, but never come realistically close to red pointing a 5.13. been on several and tried each less than 3 times. frankly, they just seemed too hard for me. i had moments of being completely shut the down. yet i could, in a try or two get a 12c next door...??? i understand that i will likely never get beyond where i am at (grade wise) unless i figure this out. the point of harder grades for me is the amount of vertical acerage it opens. if i can climb 5.13's, i will be way more comfortable on some of the more desperate, run out, scary 5.12's that i really want to do...right now, i am not comfortable getting on some of my super duper all time classics. they are at my limit. my possibly flawed logic demands i either give up the hope of getting clean ascents on some of my career routes (most are very long, and not local and i won't have the luxury of setting up vertical campgrounds and projecting them...i must on-sight) or i raise my limit so that the run out on the wisdom feels like a 5.8. any other suggestions? anyone live in or around the roaring fork valley who wants to swap gri gri time for the same in kind? any suggestions that don't involve plastic / gym time?Scott, I think the key to projecting is finding a route that you truly love, that you are happy to be climbing on, even if you are falling all over the thing. This kind of inspiration is necessary in order to motivate you to get back on the thing, day after day. As for worrying about whether you should be on a super classic route at (or beyond) your limit, I say go ahead and ignore what other people may say or think. You can't send it if you don't get on it. In order to stay motivated I think it is important to set real goals-- not necessarily to send the route, but maybe to try to link from one rest to another, or maybe to go from the fifth bolt to the top, or to do the crux move. If you tie in with a definitive, measurable goal, this will help you stay psyched. You may not have sent the route, but you can go home with a positive attitude, thinking yeah, I linked from the ground to the third bolt for the first time. The belayer issue is a real problem. I'm lucky enough to have a wife who loves to project as much as I do, so we constantly trade belay time. |
|
thanks jay- |
|
A true project feels impossible and, in fact, is impossible when you get on it for the first time. It isn't just cracking a sequence and then putting it together in a few more goes once you've tested the falls. Maybe that sort of "quickie" project is what Adam was talking about, and I would agree that it isn't as hard as onsighting at your limit. |
|
Jay Knower wrote:Scott, I think the key to projecting is finding a route that you truly love, that you are happy to be climbing on, even if you are falling all over the thing. |
|
Kayte Decker wrote:A true project feels impossible and, in fact, is impossible when you get on it for the first time. It isn't just cracking a sequence and then putting it together in a few more goes once you've tested the falls. Maybe that sort of "quickie" project is what Adam was talking about, and I would agree that it isn't as hard as onsighting at your limit. A true project isn't like that though. Sending a route that is truly at your limit brings your climbing to a place it has never been -- a level of physical performance and mental commitment you have never previously reached. If I think of my four most memorable routes, I was so exhausted at the top that I felt almost nauseous for the last 10 - 20 feet. One was an attempted onsight in Yosemite, one was a successful onsight in Squamish, and three were redpoints of memorable sport projects. All of these routes took everything I had mentally and physically, and all of them scared me. So, in my opinion, it isn't about sport vs. trad. It's about having the guts to get on a route that will test you, and embracing that challenge. That's the same on a hard trad onsight or a sport project at your absolute limit. You work on it because it inspires you. It will demand your best. Projecting is not fluffing your score card. If it's a true project you may never send it.Thanks, Kayte. I was just about to post, and it looks like you addressed everything that I wanted to say. I think you perfectly articulated the essence of projecting, for many of us. |
|
nothing better to me than an onsight. I can give a route a second try once in a while but it is never as good as the OS. |
|
At the very least, I always thought that projecting the right kind of routes(the ones I liked) was a great way to get/stay or progress into shape. Instead of doing the 13c, or whatever, in a few tries I would work it for days,weeks or months. Regardlessly I was always more fit after the send. The mental aspect of not getting overly discouraged over a bad day on a project was invaluable as well. My first 13a took 9 days to fire and I was 20 years old, I'm 39 now and they usually fall in a few tries when in proper shape. The older I get the more easy it is to get back into shape as well (I think this is due to mental strengths more than physical). There is something to be said for embracing the projecting of sport routes, for me, because of the results. I just don't get too caught up in what others think of an individuals training/climbing scenario is, I just do what works for me. |
|
scott e. tarrant wrote:thanks jay- i am going to pony up to The Avenger! i have looked at it for many years and forever been attracted. i may be reaching out for specifics... i'll keep you posted. you can lab rat my experience. i will be honest and post updates... i guess at least i picked the route for my first project...now i think it will get harder...i can't talk and think and emote and write my up it can i? thanks, scottScott, I'm psyched that you are getting on the Avenger. It's certainly one of those inspiring routes. If you want beta, or additional psyche, let me know. |